General Discussion

busterbrown

(8,515 posts) Sat Apr 8, 2017, 12:18 AM Apr 2017

Its 9:00 in L.A. Did

anyone watch Rachel tonight?
Incredible... Just tore Trump apart.

she compared Last Nights Trump Situation Room to The Obama’s Situation Room when we nailed Bin Laden .
My God, it was great and almost frightening.. So many things wrong with Trump’s Room that you can’t even begin.. Besides the fact that Trump criticized the hell out of Obama’s attack on Assad’s units 2 yrs ago when the chemical attack was way worse than the attack Trump was Responded to last night.

Bottom line? as soon as the stupid MSM figures out how totally unprepared and not well thought out Trump’s move from Mar Lago was last night... It will support the concept that Trump is a total idiot.. Unprepared for this type of event.

If anyone out there can put up Rachel Show... Please do so.
I can’t find it.

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Its 9:00 in L.A. Did (Original Post) busterbrown Apr 2017 OP

Yes Rachel's opening segment was awesome but I'm not a fan of Richard Engel. underthematrix Apr 2017 #1

Just curious. What is your problem with Richard Engel? nikibatts Apr 2017 #13

Once the details started coming out today I figured the narrative would turn Lucinda Apr 2017 #2

Youtube link Idoru Apr 2017 #3

Thanks Idoru.. busterbrown Apr 2017 #8

As usuall Rachel was great tonight. Doreen Apr 2017 #4

She's also repeated repeated 3x on Friday nights now Rhiannon12866 Apr 2017 #5

Much better than the usual prison porn... Wounded Bear Apr 2017 #6

Absolutely! Rhiannon12866 Apr 2017 #7

Trump's strike was either shocking incompetence or pointless kabuki theater. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #9

Both: incompetent kabuki Achilleaze Apr 2017 #12

is it on youtube ? JI7 Apr 2017 #10

And Lawrence kept it up after her. He had Ilsa Apr 2017 #11

Please. The Generals are now running our foreign policy and bewildered 45 is signing whatever nikibatts Apr 2017 #14

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)

1. Yes Rachel's opening segment was awesome but I'm not a fan of Richard Engel.

Reply to busterbrown (Original post)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 12:20 AM

Apr 2017

But yes it was absolutely excellent and most watch opening segment.

nikibatts

(2,198 posts)

13. Just curious. What is your problem with Richard Engel?

Reply to underthematrix (Reply #1)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 05:59 AM

Apr 2017

I know he shows up at every hot spot on the earth within minutes of the event. So quick on the spot I once thought he was an undercover terrorist.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)

2. Once the details started coming out today I figured the narrative would turn

Reply to busterbrown (Original post)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 12:20 AM

Apr 2017

Not surprised Rachel is out in front!

Idoru

(167 posts)

3. Youtube link

Reply to busterbrown (Original post)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 12:23 AM

Apr 2017

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)

8. Thanks Idoru..

Reply to Idoru (Reply #3)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 02:04 AM

Apr 2017

Great team work... Which we all need now...

Everyone of us working together.. for one goal...The quick end to this new Republican regime.

Doreen

(11,686 posts)

4. As usuall Rachel was great tonight.

Reply to busterbrown (Original post)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 12:29 AM

Apr 2017

I liked having her for two hours last night covering the bombing with O'Donnell.

Rhiannon12866

(205,486 posts)

5. She's also repeated repeated 3x on Friday nights now

Reply to busterbrown (Original post)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 12:33 AM

Apr 2017

Including at 6am ET just before their regular Saturday morning programming.

Wounded Bear

(58,670 posts)

6. Much better than the usual prison porn...

Reply to Rhiannon12866 (Reply #5)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 12:34 AM

Apr 2017

Rhiannon12866

(205,486 posts)

7. Absolutely!

Reply to Wounded Bear (Reply #6)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 12:42 AM

Apr 2017

If I get home late, I haven't missed her! And I'd rather poke myself in the eye with a sharp stick than watch prison. Though I do kinda miss Rachel announcing that we're going to prison...

SunSeeker

(51,571 posts)

9. Trump's strike was either shocking incompetence or pointless kabuki theater.

Reply to busterbrown (Original post)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 02:15 AM

Apr 2017

Trump gave his BFF Putin a heads up before the strike so Putin could move his planes and troops.

Of course, Putin then ovbiously tipped off Assad since Assad moved his planes too.

And Trump didn't even take out the airfield. As I found out tonight on Rachel's show, the runways are still in tact! Assad showed his planes taking off from that airfield today. Nor did Trump take out the chemical weapons depot. The strike pretty much did nothing to stop Assad.

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)

12. Both: incompetent kabuki

Reply to SunSeeker (Reply #9)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 05:42 AM

Apr 2017

more blowback soon, I suspect, on the royale republican truth ripoff

JI7

(89,252 posts)

10. is it on youtube ?

Reply to busterbrown (Original post)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 03:22 AM

Apr 2017

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)

11. And Lawrence kept it up after her. He had

Reply to busterbrown (Original post)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 04:20 AM

Apr 2017

David Corn, Rick Wilson, and Indira Lahkshmanan on. Corn said 45's policy was based on impulse. Wilson agreed, saying 45 is incapable of developing policy or core philosophy because he has the attention span of a gnat on meth. columnist Lakshmanan was more reserved, but was on board about lack of policy, needing Congress to approve anything else, etc.

nikibatts

(2,198 posts)

14. Please. The Generals are now running our foreign policy and bewildered 45 is signing whatever

Reply to Ilsa (Reply #11)

Sat Apr 8, 2017, 06:05 AM

Apr 2017

is stuck under his nose. Most of the options now on the table were developed during the Obama administration and left there for future use. Congress would not give Obama the power he needed and he knew they wouldn't. That is why he asked for it. He was always a head of the game. Iranians are smarter than both Russia and Syria. They know they have the fire power without having nukes. They remain under the radar with surrogates acting on their behalf. Wait for it.

Reply to this discussion