Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
Sat Apr 8, 2017, 12:17 PM Apr 2017

Why is the media taking it as axiomatic that Assad committed chemical attacks?

It seems like we've been through this before. Has there been, at the very least, overwhelming evidence he committed the crime this time? If, so, I'd like to review it and then take a stance, but so far the media is acting from the premises that he did it. No questions asked.

Just to be clear, I'm not saying he didn't do it. It's the unquestioning behavior of the media that has me concerned. Like I've said, we've been through this before with a compliant media leading us to terrible conflagrations.

Should have all of us concerned.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why is the media taking it as axiomatic that Assad committed chemical attacks? (Original Post) Fantastic Anarchist Apr 2017 OP
Assad is a pox-ridden tyrant. MineralMan Apr 2017 #1
He might have, he might not have ... Fantastic Anarchist Apr 2017 #7
The media are not all-knowing. MineralMan Apr 2017 #8
They need to inform us, and they are not doing that. Fantastic Anarchist Apr 2017 #10
They are not doing that, but MineralMan Apr 2017 #12
The media by and large are credulous fools. They've never understoodt KingCharlemagne Apr 2017 #2
I disagree. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #5
The corporate media sees its role as reporting what was said, not investigating what was said. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #3
That's so on point and frustrating. Fantastic Anarchist Apr 2017 #6
Because WMDs. L. Coyote Apr 2017 #4
The Press believes the Govt on foreign matters Cicada Apr 2017 #9
What would be the alternate theory? oberliner Apr 2017 #11
You know, some rebels whipped up some sarin in a basement.. EX500rider Apr 2017 #13
Of course. What ragtag band of rebels doesn't have a high security chemical manufacting plant and FSogol Apr 2017 #14

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
1. Assad is a pox-ridden tyrant.
Sat Apr 8, 2017, 12:27 PM
Apr 2017

Did he do it? I have no idea. He should not be in charge of anything, though. I do know that. If he didn't do the nerve gas thing, he would liked to have done it, if it served a purpose for him.

Screw Assad!

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
7. He might have, he might not have ...
Sat Apr 8, 2017, 12:53 PM
Apr 2017

But it's really worrying that our media doesn't questing it a bit, nor do most congresspersons. We're dealing with a megalomaniac who has no qualms about lying to you or to anyone, and yet we unquestioningly follow him.

It's disturbing and sickening.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
8. The media are not all-knowing.
Sat Apr 8, 2017, 12:55 PM
Apr 2017

In fact, their ability to do investigative reporting is really lower now than ever before.

They simply report what they learn from other sources these days, and have little interest in the expensive process of actually digging into what they report. That's the reality.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
12. They are not doing that, but
Sat Apr 8, 2017, 02:32 PM
Apr 2017

they probably don't feel the need to do so, regardless of how you feel about it. The problem is, in part, that the media are made up of profit-making entities. They are less driven by your needs and mine than they are by their advertisers, who are the ones who pay the high costs of the news business.

Sadly, I see no remedy for that.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
2. The media by and large are credulous fools. They've never understoodt
Sat Apr 8, 2017, 12:32 PM
Apr 2017

the Latin phrase cui bono? (who benefits?) so, of course, they never ask it.

Trump flagrantly violated international law and committed an act of naked military aggression. But you won't see anyone in the media utter those words.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
5. I disagree.
Sat Apr 8, 2017, 12:34 PM
Apr 2017

Leslie Moonves stated that Trump might be terrible for America but he was great for ratings. And ratings translate into profits.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
3. The corporate media sees its role as reporting what was said, not investigating what was said.
Sat Apr 8, 2017, 12:33 PM
Apr 2017

They generally uncritically accept every right wing assertion on anything as a fact, or at least as a reasonable alternative.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
9. The Press believes the Govt on foreign matters
Sat Apr 8, 2017, 01:56 PM
Apr 2017

They believed the govt story on the Gulf of Tonkin, they believed that Saddam Hussein had WMD, they believed that Sadat Hussein snatched incubators from Kuwaiti infants etc. They get swept up in patriotism during foreign conflicts. It must be human nature because it always happens , not just in our country.

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
13. You know, some rebels whipped up some sarin in a basement..
Sat Apr 8, 2017, 02:39 PM
Apr 2017

....and then used it to gas themselves by arial bomb with their non-existent airforce.

FSogol

(45,488 posts)
14. Of course. What ragtag band of rebels doesn't have a high security chemical manufacting plant and
Sat Apr 8, 2017, 02:58 PM
Apr 2017

a fleet of bombers with supporting fighter aircraft? There is probably a Syrian MacGuyver making the stuff out of paperclips or a Syrian Gilligan's Professor making bombers out of coconuts, This is much more plausible than Assad, who has done this before, doing it again.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is the media taking i...