heard of Matthew Yglesias. If she's pissing people off, she's doing something right.

but I bet I'm not missing anything....

This whiplash inducing "love him/hate him" about pundits has been old for a long time.

I honestly don't give a damn about anybody's opinion and I don't watch cable or broadcast "news." If somebody manages to come up with a few facts, I appreciate it when they pan out. However, the constant flood of opinion parading as journalism is not something I pay particular attention to.

News junkie? Yeah, guilty. Opinion junkie? Go away.

The "Ivancept" strikes again.... Consider the source.

it wrong. It=journalism.

I really do not care what he thinks

I was not disagreeing with your post

Glenn should see if he can get the job as assignment editor for the show; then it would cover only the subjects he deems fit for discussion, and not this dreary old myriad connections between the Trump administration and the Russian government/Russian mobsters/Russian bankers/other assorted Russian riff-raff.

The goal is to slowly make all the reporting of this corruption and treason fade away. Go Rachel!

I would think the Russian connection is sort of important

I even threw in my two cents.

I've never cared for either Greenwald or the Young Turks. Seems like the enjoy hearing themselves talk. Rambling talk.

I WANT Rachel, Lawrence and others to keep the Trump-Russia out in the open. I wish they'd discuss Trump's taxes, too.

i need more info on dancing with the stars or mel B's divorce. (sarcasm)

Credibility is ruined as far as I am concerned.

God she is covering it.

If she weren't pushing the issue, the issue would be dead.

She's a patriot. Though they'll never understand that.

NOT!!!!

Exposing the Trump cartel as a group of racketeers who sold out our nation to the Russians in exchange for personal wealth and aggrandizement.

She will be revered as being as heroic as Woodward and Bernstein.

THANK YOU RACHEL FOR NOT GIVING IN TO THIS KIND OF BULLYING.

She stayed on that as others caught up to her ~

The Intercept doesn't like people saying mean things about Russia.

She is pissing off all the right/wrong people and I do worry about her safety.

administration and devote plenty of time doing so, as well as to the GOP. I've heard them talk about Russia and Putin too. They have no love for either. I think that the Russia story is big, mostly because we should never let a foreign power interfere with our elections, and because if we can nail Trump and his cabinet-members, campaign people, etc. to the wall for treason we should, but as to why we lost the election, I think that is absolutely absurd.

There is nothing, short of actually hacking our machines that Russia could have done that our own media didn't let that kind of crap fake news get away with, or even itself run with. Our media, as usual, is why we lost, from its tepid to non-existent reporting on gerrymandering and voter suppression, not to mention hackable voting machines, to its horrible journalism.

I can't speak to the intercept, I don't know it, but at least the Young Turks understands that underlying reality...corporate media is fucking us.

It's good to adopt a skeptical stance towards all media. Hating corporate media shouldn't make us fly to the arms of alternative media. Best to treat all new information as a scientist would new data.

NYT and WaPo aren't so bad. ( I even read WSJ)

(Btw I just realised the title of my previous post might be seen as mocking ( I wasn't mocking) didn't realise I repeated the "seriously" )

Cable News Media is a different beast - they're definitely worth all the criticism you laid out.

incredible deception from the bush administration and the media ( and congress) treated Cheney&Co as though they were good faith actors.

NYT have been terrible in some respects, even last year, so they won't always get it right.

but Cable News media was downright awful and has been for decades.