General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGreenwald and Taibbi have shown their true stripes. They are not our allies and never have been --
Last edited Sat Apr 15, 2017, 02:30 AM - Edit history (1)
no matter how many times they try to dupe people into thinking "libertarian" is just another version of "liberal." And no matter what occasional article might appear to be written from a progressive viewpoint in The Intercept.
http://thedailybanter.com/2017/04/rachel-maddow-voted-off-the-purity-island/
Rachel Maddow Attacked by Greenwald Left For Too Much Reporting On Russia
Greenwald's "The Intercept" is deeply troubled that she's spending too much time covering the single largest story in American political history.
Glenn Greenwald's ostensibly liberal "The Intercept" is still hard at work trying to convince the world that the mountain of evidence piling up that Donald Trump is a puppet ("No puppet! No puppet!" of Vladimir Putin is fake news. Their latest target is, incredibly, Rachel Maddow who has put considerable effort into connecting the myriad dots into an increasingly hard-to-ignore picture. Why? Because The Intercept's Aaron Maté just isn't convinced the Russia scandal deserves this much attention:
Lacking concrete supporting evidence didn't seem to stop The Intercept's breathless reporting on Hillary's mythical "corruption." But, you know, "Clinton Rules" rule when it comes to standards of evidence.
Maté goes on to give a thorough analysis (with pretty charts!) that show Maddow has been devoting slightly more than half of her show to stories related to Trump's Russia scandal for the past several weeks. What a waste of time! Instead, Maté suggests, Maddow should be spending her time attacking, who else, the wicked and corrupt Democratic Party:
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Taibbi is just one of those lefties who are so committed to the idea that the Dems choosing Clinton was a bad idea that they are forced by some weird necessity to deny any Russian involvement in the election.
Greenwald is hot trash, though.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)reason: You've told one interviewer, Im never comfortable when people call me a lefty. If anyone were to ever ask, Id say I'm probably more of a libertarian than anything else. I believe in capitalism, small government, etc.
melman
(7,681 posts)Weird.
Cha
(297,323 posts)got their rw talking points down.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)she strongly supported Hillary over DT.
And you cannot find a single post where I "championed" Mensch.
FDRsGhost
(470 posts)and you and I have had this convo already.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)FDRsGhost
(470 posts)lol I'm selling you a bridge.
She's a conspiracy freak and you know it.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)And they did. And we KNOW that after the initial spontaneous days of the protest, many outsiders came to join in. Those outsiders certainly could have included some with connections to Russia.
From 2014:
https://www.buzzfeed.com/maxseddon/russia-is-trolling-the-us-over-ferguson-yet-again?utm_term=.lp6rBVmGm#.svgJRepmp
KIEV, Ukraine Russian media has been unable to contain its glee at the news that fresh riots have broken out in Ferguson: America is gripped in the throes of a violent race war as retribution for the bloody revolution it had plotted against Moscows allies in Ukraine, according to the pro-Kremlin press.
The conflict in Ferguson isnt a one-time event, but something profound, Russian state television anchor Alexander Khristenko said on the Rossiya channel. Race relations, social inequality, a black ghetto the fragile world that hardly held itself together through a belief in just a little bit of fairness, it seems, has finally collapsed.
Russian media, which usually prioritize coverage of Vladimir Putins every move and the Ukraine crisis ahead of more distant international events, have run wall-to-wall bulletins on the violence in Ferguson since it began in August. Coverage of the fresh rioting led every pro-Kremlin newscast on Tuesday. Russia Today, the Kremlins English-language propaganda channel, broadcast live from the scene.
For the Kremlin, the upheaval in the U.S. is a chance to score points against the White House for its support of the pro-Western Maidan protests that began in Ukraine a year ago and precipitated the biggest crisis in East-West relations since the Cold War. Sergei Naryshkin, speaker of Russias parliament and a close Russian ally, hinted on Tuesday that the rioting was Americas just desserts for plunging the world into the chaos of its one-sided diktat, the Itar-TASS news agency reported. Vladimir Vasiliev, a political scientist interviewed as an expert on the U.S. by the pro-Kremlin TV channel LifeNews, went one further. Its the combination of a number of factors: the Americans have overdone it with Ukraine recently, and Maidan has come to the U.S., he said. RIA Novosti, Russias Kremlins state newswire, referred to the Missouri National Guard with the same abbreviation it uses for Ukraines national guard, which has become a favorite Kremlin bugbear for the prominent far-right fighters in its ranks.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/19/ferguson-outsiders-protesters-riots-peaceful-unrest
For more than a week the people of Ferguson welcomed the outside activists who flocked here to show solidarity after police killed an unarmed teenager. By day 11, some residents were having second thoughts.
The intensified mayhem of recent nights, apparently initiated by a small, organised group of agitators, has raised a question mark over the strangers who join the nightly demonstrations.
Who the hell are you people? one woman shouted early on Tuesday morning as youths surged towards a phalanx of police, hurling insults, water bottles and, later, molotov cocktails.
With the national guard deployed to quell civil unrest in the US for the first time in over a decade, amid a night of gunshots, teargas, chaos and 31 arrests, it was an urgent question.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)who arrived in Ferguson several days after the murder - and the peaceful protests by locals. It isn't "nutty," knowing what we know about Russia, including Clint Watts testimony about active measures before the Senate Intelligence Committee, to think that Russia was involved in funding some of the violent agitators.
Mensch distinguishes between peaceful BLM people and the outsiders who arrive at peaceful events to disrupt them. This is what Mensch said just today:
https://twitter.com/LouiseMensch
Louise Mensch Retweeted
Louise Mensch?
Verified account
@LouiseMensch 34m
34 minutes ago
Russian active measures smearing the peaceful #blacklivesmatter movement in Ferguson and elsewhere
FDRsGhost
(470 posts)She's a nut.
Ya said today like a week later after the fact lol
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)The Ferguson protests started out peacefully, but they became violent when outsiders arrived. That was reported by numerous sources at the time.
And after Clinton Watts testimony, it seems quite possible that some of those outsiders were connected with Russia.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Of course, you've brought us the likes of ZeroHedge and ArmsControlWonk to spread some pretty stupid FUD.
You got pwned. Seems to be a regular occurrence.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)synergie
(1,901 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)of SHITE.
"Taibbi calls it an exercise of conspiratorial mass hysteria.
he was always lying about President Obama.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Taibbi is a serious writer and checks his facts.
I studied different companies that Bain Capital had invested in when Romney ran and found some oddities in the KB Toy Co where Bain restructured a company that didn't need it, having been just restructured.
That was Jan 14, 2012 https://www.democraticunderground.com/12511407
On August 29th he published a lengthy expose of Romney business practices. About halfway down he mirrors my main points. He even gets an executive to basically admit to it.
No one was really looking at KB at the time. The key points on that part of the story were so similar to mine I wonder if Taibbi reads DU for ideas for stories.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/greed-and-debt-the-true-story-of-mitt-romney-and-bain-capital-20120829
Bain ended up earning a return of at least 370 percent on the deal, while KB Toys fell into bankruptcy, saddled with millions in debt. KB's former parent company, Big Lots, alleged in bankruptcy court that Bain's "unjustified" return on the dividend recap was actually "900 percent in a mere 16 months." Patnode, by contrast, was fired in December 2008, after almost four decades on the job. Like other employees, he didn't get a single day's severance.
I ask Slavkin Corzo what Bain's justification was for the giant dividend recapitalization in the KB Toys acquisition. The question throws her, as though she's surprised anyone would ask for a reason a company like Bain would loot a firm like KB Toys. "It wasn't like, 'Yay, we did a good job, we get a dividend,'" she says with a laugh. "It was like, 'We can do this, so we will.'?"
At the time of the KB Toys deal, Romney was a Bain investor and owner, making him a mere beneficiary of the raping and pillaging, rather than its direct organizer. Moreover, KB's demise was hastened by a host of genuine market forces, including competition from video games and cellphones. But there's absolutely no way to look at what Bain did at KB and see anything but a cash grab one that followed the business model laid out by Romney. Rather than cutting costs and tightening belts, Bain added $300 million in debt to the firm's bottom line while taking out more than $120 million in cash an outright looting that creditors later described in a lawsuit as "breaking open the piggy bank." What's more, Bain smoothed the deal in typical fashion by giving huge bonuses to the company's top managers as the firm headed toward bankruptcy. CEO Michael Glazer got an incredible $18.4 million, while CFO Robert Feldman received $4.8 million and senior VP Thomas Alfonsi took home $3.3 million.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)you posted, to draw progressive readers in.
Cha
(297,323 posts)sense of the word..
TROLL
a person who intentionally antagonizes others online by posting inflammatory, irrelevant, or offensive comments or other disruptive content Internet trolls
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/troll
radical noodle
(8,003 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)She is delivering the best reporting on what I find to be the most important political story in this entire country right now. I've always said, to hell with Greenwald. He is a sniveling, arrogant piece of shit with very questionable ideological values.
Matt Taibbi can be disappointing at times and I very much disagree with him when it comes to his never-ending cynicism with the top players in the Democratic party, but at the least, he seems to be personally like-able. Greenwald is obnoxious. I don't think I could be in the same room with him for long.
synergie
(1,901 posts)all those right wing talking points!
dalton99a
(81,526 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)I never had any use for freaking taibbi.. speaking of "conspiracies".
The profiteering left.. assisting in screwing up the Planet.
Fucker. and then there's the greenwald gd troll
This mate sounds like the biggest stupid fuck, too
My money is on Rachel and the Facts.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)BadgerMom
(2,771 posts)I knew about Greenwald but thought Taibbi did some good work during the election. Since the election I have learned to loathe him.
Vinca
(50,279 posts)I hope he's not correct, but in the end, if nothing happens - a real possibility in this GOP led investigation - he could be closer to reality than we are. The one thing Taibbi isn't afraid to do is say he's wrong when he's wrong so if there are perp walks, he'll be writing a mea culpa with no hesitation.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Demsrule86
(68,599 posts)He is the reason I no longer subscribe to Rolling Stone.
Nanjeanne
(4,961 posts)his bio connected to this article and then read a couple of the articles linked. I also read Taibbi's article that was linked, which I found interesting - as I do with much of Taibbi's writing. I'll draw my own conclusions. This Daily Banter opinion piece is just another person's opinion as is much of The Daily Banter content - which I'll weigh as I make up my own mind.
But I'll keep reading Matt Taibbi since I seem to agree with him in more instances than I disagree.
Progressive dog
(6,905 posts)realizing that Greenwald and his ilk are only happy when liberal democratic government fails.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)I've seen many posts to that effect on DU over the past few years. Most of those were shouted down, and some were even juried into oblivion.
nikibatts
(2,198 posts)At least two who were banned for expressing any criticism of Bernie and supporters and any talk against Matt.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Not DU' s finest hours.
nikibatts
(2,198 posts)Still trying to prove she is a criminal stooge of Wall Street and that Bernie is God's second son.
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Nanjeanne This message was self-deleted by its author.
TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)They are the press. Seems pretty simple to me. Do we really want an echo chamber? We're better than that. If we can't handle criticism from the press, who are supposed to hold us accountable and make us better, God help us.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Gothmog
(145,344 posts)alarimer
(16,245 posts)Are journalists only supposed to tell you what you want to hear? Maybe you want to live in a liberal news bubble, but I sure as hell don't. I read the Economist, Mother Jones and the Nation. I don't consider any particular news outlet the gospel truth because I engage in critical thinking, unlike many here.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Truth is on our side. Alternative facts are not.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)He consistently tries to misdirect his readers to look away from the actions of a right wing oppressive Russian regime while pushing his opinions on a single political party. He's trying to supress important news through lies and manipulation. That's a propagandist/agent devoting himself to the cause of a dictator, not a journalist.
BigDemVoter
(4,150 posts)I don't like him anymore.
WoonTars
(694 posts)But i think he's mad that he missed the boat on the Trump/Russia connection
Mensch, on the other hand is a right-wing Thatcherite conservative.
I know who out of those three I absolutely don't trust, and it isn't Greenwald or Taibbi.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)She also strongly supported Hillary over Trump in the general.
Greenwald is a Snowden/Assange enabler who is a libertarian trying to pose as a liberal.
WoonTars
(694 posts)...politicians ever to lead a country.
Glen Greenwald is a journalist who sometimes looses the plot.
Not sure what Ed Snowden has to do with this?