Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Do we and other nations not have missile defense systems? (Original Post) maveric Apr 2017 OP
These missile systems are far from fool proof. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2017 #1
Yes - but their effectiveness against ICBMs is doubtful jpak Apr 2017 #2
Yes we do, a multi-layered system.. EX500rider Apr 2017 #3
They're not super reliable. RedWedge Apr 2017 #4
Missile defense is pretty useless against an attack TexasProgresive Apr 2017 #5
Physics. mn9driver Apr 2017 #6

jpak

(41,758 posts)
2. Yes - but their effectiveness against ICBMs is doubtful
Sat Apr 15, 2017, 11:30 AM
Apr 2017

We have radars and interceptors in Alaska - and some interceptors in CA.

The DoD is planning to build an East Coast interceptor base soon.

.....

U.S. missile defense system is ‘simply unable to protect the public,’ report says

http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-na-missile-defense-failings/


The system designed to defend American cities and towns against a nuclear attack by North Korea is “simply unable to protect the U.S. public” and will remain ineffective unless Congress exerts rigorous oversight, according to a new report.

The report, to be released Thursday by the Union of Concerned Scientists, recommends that the Obama administration halt the expansion of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system, known as GMD, until its technical problems have been solved.

“The story of this system is a cautionary tale about how the lack of appropriate oversight of a politically charged missile defense program has led to a system in tatters,” said the report, written by three physicists with expertise in missile defense.

“Despite more than a decade of development and a bill of $40 billion, the GMD system is simply unable to protect the U.S. public,’’ the authors wrote.

<more>

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
5. Missile defense is pretty useless against an attack
Sat Apr 15, 2017, 11:54 AM
Apr 2017

from a country will lots of missiles such as the U.S. and Russia. A massive missile attack would be accompanied by false devices to fool any anti-missile system. Then most of our delivery systems have multi warhead capabilities. The warheads are separated from the missile to go to their targets. It was found with the use of the Patriot anti-missile system that many of the hits on SCUDs were to the hot body of the missile which had ejected its warhead.

With NK there is no info that these alleged ICBMs can fly or even carry a nuclear warhead. These systems might be easy to take down. Time will tell. The Buffoon in Chief probably thinks the west coast is expendable. Right now I am not too fearful of NK striking us. I am more worried about us striking NK and getting into a massive war where our allies SK and Japan are damaged and the Tiger to the north wakes up to the debacle.

mn9driver

(4,426 posts)
6. Physics.
Sat Apr 15, 2017, 12:02 PM
Apr 2017

It's very hard to intercept something moving as fast as an ICBM. The US has hardware that can do this, but everything has to line up for it to work.

Bad timing, bad geometry, equals failure. Throw in decoys and the success rate drops even more.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do we and other nations n...