Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

No DUplicitous DUpe

(2,994 posts)
Tue Jul 3, 2012, 04:07 AM Jul 2012

Another doozy from America, Inc.

Another doozy from America, Inc.
by Johnny Boyd, Aspen Daily News Columnist
Monday, July 2, 2012
http://www.aspendailynews.com/section/columnist/153747

<snip>
When Chief Justice John Roberts joined with the liberals on the Supreme Court to advance Obamacare you would think he had drowned a kitten. The outrage was tempered only by the speculation as to why he did it. Was he trying to save the court’s reputation by abdicating the usual right-wing party line? It’s too late for that. The Supreme Court is a political arm of America, Inc.

The only theory I haven’t heard advanced is the most likely reason for his vote: Everything is about the money. Roberts was doing the bidding of the insurance companies that have part ownership in our three branches of government. Private insurers stand to make a killing off Obamacare and voting it down would’ve cost them billions. With this vote, the only person taking a political hit is the unelected Justice John Roberts, while the rest of the court and the Republicans in Congress can register phony outrage and keep the base frothing at the mouth over tyrannical government health care. By the way, frothing at the mouth is covered under Obamacare.
<snip>

Read the whole column at: http://www.aspendailynews.com/section/columnist/153747

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another doozy from America, Inc. (Original Post) No DUplicitous DUpe Jul 2012 OP
K&R silverweb Jul 2012 #1
More to it than that brush Jul 2012 #2
Makes no sense to me... AynRandCollectedSS Jul 2012 #3
Of course the insurance co.'s fought it JNelson6563 Jul 2012 #4
The insurance companies WROTE it eridani Jul 2012 #5
This is probably true Doctor_J Jul 2012 #6

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
1. K&R
Tue Jul 3, 2012, 04:23 AM
Jul 2012

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]By all means, read the whole article. It makes the most sense of anything I've read on the ACA decision so far.

brush

(53,924 posts)
2. More to it than that
Tue Jul 3, 2012, 05:27 AM
Jul 2012

That argument sounds good but there's a poison pill in the healthcare bill that goes something like this, and this is a quote from another article on this site (http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002894046): "a provision of the law, called the medical loss ratio, that requires health insurance companies to spend 80% of the consumers’ premium dollars they collect—85% for large group insurers—on actual medical care rather than overhead, marketing expenses and profit. Failure on the part of insurers to meet this requirement will result in the insurers having to send their customers a rebate check representing the amount in which they underspend on actual medical care." I would say that's why the repugs are so upset. There are so many parts of the new law that actually benefit people in many different ways.

AynRandCollectedSS

(108 posts)
3. Makes no sense to me...
Tue Jul 3, 2012, 05:42 AM
Jul 2012

If it were all about money for insurance companies then:

1. Scalia, Thomas and the rest of the conservative Justices would have been for it.
2. The Republicans would not be sh**ing themselves right now--and they are freaking out! It's not just about Obama winning. Their corporate overlords are MAD!
3. Insurance companies would not have spent over $100M to secretly turn the American public against it.

Like the last poster said, the 20/80 "poison pill" provision was ingenius. I think that's why the insurance companies supported ACA at first and then did an abrupt about-face. They found out about all if the added consumer protections.

BWAHAHAHAHA! Well played, Mr. Obama!

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
4. Of course the insurance co.'s fought it
Tue Jul 3, 2012, 07:27 AM
Jul 2012

and continue to scream bloody murder about it, no doubt giving R's plenty o' dough for the election.

But yeah, they secretly wanted it.

Uh-huh.

Next up: The Real Anastasia Lives!
Followed by: Obama's Birth Certificate; Forgery?

Julie

eridani

(51,907 posts)
5. The insurance companies WROTE it
Tue Jul 3, 2012, 07:30 AM
Jul 2012

They wanted the mandate. Now that they got it, they are switching their support to Republicans in order to eliminate such consumer protection provisions as made it through.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
6. This is probably true
Tue Jul 3, 2012, 08:43 AM
Jul 2012

They got their mandate, and now in the next Repuke Congress will overturn all of the bad parts (for Big Insurance). And of course upholding it, they get all the Hate Radio idiots frothing at the mouth from now until November.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Another doozy from Americ...