Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
Sat Apr 22, 2017, 08:02 PM Apr 2017

The Handmaids Tale Is a Warning to Conservative Women

Hulu’s adaptation of Margaret Atwood’s novel lays bare the horrors of collusion with the patriarchy.

Set in the very near future, Hulu’s new adaptation of The Handmaid’s Tale subtly updates Atwood’s dystopia. The execution of a gay woman in episode three seems inspired by a real Iranian execution. Played by Elisabeth Moss, Offred is more relatable than she’s ever been, with a motto (“I intend to survive”) destined for a thousand Etsy products. In the show, as in our moment, it is not just men, but crucially some women, too, who fervently wish for a society where women are no longer free or equal. Women known as Aunts initiate the Handmaids into their new roles; Wives terrorize Handmaids with little restraint. These women midwife Gilead into the world, though it’s not clear what they stand to gain from any of it.

Most contradictory and recognizable of all these female collaborators is Serena Joy (Yvonne Strahovski), the wife of Offred’s commander. Before Gilead, she graced American television screens as a preternaturally blond evangelist. (Serena Joy was her stage name, a nom de guerre for the culture wars.) Even though she occupies the highest rank for a woman in this new world, she is now legally inferior to her sad-sack husband and, finding herself childless, has to employ Offred as a surrogate. Rage roils the edges of her ice-princess restraint. “She doesn’t make speeches anymore,” Offred notes in the book. “She stays in her home, but it doesn’t seem to agree with her. How furious she must be, now that she’s been taken at her word.”


America is rich in Serena Joys. One need look no further for her contemporary counterparts than Michelle Duggar and her daughters; or Paula White, the televangelist who allegedly led Donald Trump to Christ; or his aide Kellyanne Conway, who defends him as a “great boss” to women. The character Atwood invented is an amalgam of Phyllis Schlafly and Tammy Faye Bakker with a dash of Aimee Semple McPherson. The spectacle of the female fundamentalist celebrity is not recent, and she is not an anomaly. Her existence is proof of American fundamentalism’s durability, and a reminder that it could not thrive without the enthusiastic backing of women.


I think that there are women all over the political spectrum who draw their identity and power from the men they align with, particularly when they are young, and more susceptible to the cultural messages that their power lies in their desirability and utility to men.

https://newrepublic.com/article/141674/handmaids-tale-hulu-warning-conservative-women
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Handmaids Tale Is a Warning to Conservative Women (Original Post) ehrnst Apr 2017 OP
Not just conservatives BainsBane Apr 2017 #1
Oh yes. Extremists on any side are never good for women. ehrnst Apr 2017 #3
Unless they are millionaires... Kath2 Apr 2017 #2
can't remember where i read it........ Takket Apr 2017 #4
Wow! What a great article! athena Apr 2017 #5
It's the same misinterpretation as is "1984" meow2u3 Apr 2017 #6
Dystopia Woodstock66 Apr 2017 #7
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
3. Oh yes. Extremists on any side are never good for women.
Sat Apr 22, 2017, 08:10 PM
Apr 2017

Religious zealots, political zealots...

Any movement that demands absolute lockstep with dogma has no use for the "needs" of a woman facing childbearing decisions.

Childbearing and childrearing issues distract from the goals of movements led by men, in the service of men.

Takket

(21,577 posts)
4. can't remember where i read it........
Sat Apr 22, 2017, 08:17 PM
Apr 2017

but after the election there was an article about the surprising number of women who voted for 45 because, just like any misogynistic male 45 voter, they felt a woman was simply not capable of running the country.

athena

(4,187 posts)
5. Wow! What a great article!
Sat Apr 22, 2017, 08:18 PM
Apr 2017
But The Handmaid’s Tale does more than present a possible future: It asks us to consider how we’d end up there. A form of feminism that celebrates power for power’s sake, instead of interrogating how it is concentrated and distributed, will usher us into fascism. Feminism means something. Some choices oppress the women who make them, and some beliefs, if enforced, would oppress everyone else, too. Allow an antichoice woman to call herself a feminist, and you have ceded political territory that you cannot afford to lose. Stripped of political meaning, “feminist” becomes an entirely subjective term that anyone with any agenda can use.


(Emphasis mine.)

In the original, the words "Allow an antichoice woman to call herself a feminist" contain a link to a recent NYT opinion piece in which an anti-choicer called herself a "feminist" and demanded that the feminist movement accept anti-choicers.

meow2u3

(24,764 posts)
6. It's the same misinterpretation as is "1984"
Sat Apr 22, 2017, 08:18 PM
Apr 2017

The religious far right thinks "The Handmaid's Tale" is an instruction manual.

Woodstock66

(8 posts)
7. Dystopia
Sat Apr 22, 2017, 08:20 PM
Apr 2017

I was in high school when this book came out and every girl in my English class read it. We were all horrified, but thought, "No way that could happen here."

How wrong we were.

I don't understand how any self-respecting woman could be a conservative. How do they justify to themselves that they follow an ideology in which men truly believe they're nothing more than incubators?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Handmaids Tale Is a W...