Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Senate's Russia probe has no full-time staff & barely any money, and it hasn't interviewed any
The Senate's Russia probe has no full-time staff & barely any money, and it hasn't interviewed any Trump associates.
Link to tweet
4 paragraphs don't tell you all you need to know. Please read the entire article.
Senate Trump-Russia Probe Has No Full-Time Staff, No Key Witnesses
There are just seven part-time staffers working on the Senate inquiry. Not one of them is a trained investigator. And they havent interviewed a single player in Trumps orbit.
The Senate Intelligence Committees probe into Russias election interference is supposedly the best hope for getting the public credible answers about whether there was any coordination between the Kremlin and Trump Tower.
But there are serious reasons to doubt that it can accomplish this task, as currently configured.
More than three months after the committee announced that it had agreed on the scope of the investigation, the panel has not begun substantially investigating possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, three individuals with ties to the committee told The Daily Beast.
The investigation does not have a single staffer dedicated to it full-time, and those staff members working on it part-time do not have significant investigative experience. The probe currently appears to be moving at a pace slower than prior Senate Intelligence Committee investigations, such as the CIA torture inquiry, which took years to accomplish.
No interviews have been conducted with key individuals suspected of being in the Trump-Russia orbit: not Michael Flynn, not Roger Stone, not Carter Page, not Paul Manafort, and not Jared Kushner, according to two sources familiar with the committees procedures.
Much more here: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/04/23/senate-trump-russia-probe-has-no-full-time-staff-no-key-witnesses.html
There are just seven part-time staffers working on the Senate inquiry. Not one of them is a trained investigator. And they havent interviewed a single player in Trumps orbit.
The Senate Intelligence Committees probe into Russias election interference is supposedly the best hope for getting the public credible answers about whether there was any coordination between the Kremlin and Trump Tower.
But there are serious reasons to doubt that it can accomplish this task, as currently configured.
More than three months after the committee announced that it had agreed on the scope of the investigation, the panel has not begun substantially investigating possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, three individuals with ties to the committee told The Daily Beast.
The investigation does not have a single staffer dedicated to it full-time, and those staff members working on it part-time do not have significant investigative experience. The probe currently appears to be moving at a pace slower than prior Senate Intelligence Committee investigations, such as the CIA torture inquiry, which took years to accomplish.
No interviews have been conducted with key individuals suspected of being in the Trump-Russia orbit: not Michael Flynn, not Roger Stone, not Carter Page, not Paul Manafort, and not Jared Kushner, according to two sources familiar with the committees procedures.
Much more here: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/04/23/senate-trump-russia-probe-has-no-full-time-staff-no-key-witnesses.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 5724 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Senate's Russia probe has no full-time staff & barely any money, and it hasn't interviewed any (Original Post)
MelissaB
Apr 2017
OP
Did someone think the Republicans were really going to conduct a full investigation
PoliticAverse
Apr 2017
#7
spanone
(135,882 posts)1. K&R...
MattP
(3,304 posts)2. But it's bipartisan
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)3. Another snip
In one hint about the inadequacies of the investigation, Senate Intelligence Committee member Sen. Ron Wyden last month sent a letter to the Republican and Democrat heads of the panel, imploring them to look into financial relationships between Russia, President Trump, and his associates. The implication behind the letter? That the committee wasnt already looking into it.
...snip
Of the seven staffers so far assigned to review classified documents related to the Russia investigation, none of them has prosecutorial or investigative experience, according to three sources with ties to the committee.
Most of them lack a background in Russia expertise. Not one of the seven is a lawyer.
I dont see how you can do this without trained investigators and prosecutors. I think you need to have expertise on the intel side and on the prosecution side. You would ideally need someone who knows how to do a counterintelligence operation, said Scott Horton, an attorney who has focused on anti-corruption investigations, with a specialization in the Soviet Union and post-Soviet states.
...snip
Of the seven staffers so far assigned to review classified documents related to the Russia investigation, none of them has prosecutorial or investigative experience, according to three sources with ties to the committee.
Most of them lack a background in Russia expertise. Not one of the seven is a lawyer.
I dont see how you can do this without trained investigators and prosecutors. I think you need to have expertise on the intel side and on the prosecution side. You would ideally need someone who knows how to do a counterintelligence operation, said Scott Horton, an attorney who has focused on anti-corruption investigations, with a specialization in the Soviet Union and post-Soviet states.
Sculpin Beauregard
(1,046 posts)4. INDEPENDENT. FUCKING. INVESTIGATION. NOW!!!
this is beyond bullshit. Fucking beyond.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)5. + 1 000
Russia is perpetrating acts of war on America. And the Republicans are letting them do it. This is the most half assed effort. Republican should be ashamed of themselves for selling out America doing nothing to defend the country.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)6. Independent commission!
So 7 part time staffers. Warner said 1000 Russian hackers. So Russia has at least more than a hundred times more resources invested in destroying America than we have invested to stop them.
Bleccccchhhh.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)7. Did someone think the Republicans were really going to conduct a full investigation
into the issue?
TheFrenchRazor
(2,116 posts)8. i'm shocked... not. nt