General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe ACHA will also slash funds for NURSING HOMES and at-home care for ELDERLY and DISABLED.
From the AARP:
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/aarp-maintains-firm-opposition-to-health-bill-300451124.html
AARP opposes the provisions of the American Health Care Act that create a per capita cap financing structure in the Medicaid program. We are concerned that these provisions could endanger the health, safety, and care of millions of individuals who depend on the essential services provided through Medicaid. CBO found that the bill would cut Medicaid funding by $880 billion over 2017-2026, about 25 percent less than what it projects under current law. Medicaid is a vital safety net and intergenerational lifeline for millions of individuals, including over 17.4 million low-income seniors and children and adults with disabilities who rely on the program for critical health care and long-term services and supports (LTSS, i.e., assistance with daily activities such as eating, bathing, dressing, managing medications, and transportation). Older adults and people with disabilities now account for over sixty percent of Medicaid spending, and cuts of this magnitude will result in loss of benefits and services for this vulnerable population.
Of these 17.4 million individuals: 6.9 million are ages 65 and older (which equals more than 1 in every 7 elderly Medicare beneficiaries)3; 10.5 million are children and adults living with disabilities; and about 10.8 million are so poor or have a disability that they qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid (dual eligibles).4 Dual eligibles account for almost 33 percent of Medicaid spending. While they comprise a relatively small percentage of enrollees, they account for a disproportionate share of total Medicare and Medicaid spending.
Individuals with disabilities of all ages and older adults rely on critical Medicaid services, including home and community-based services (HCBS) for assistance with daily activities such as eating, bathing, dressing, and home modifications; nursing home care; and other benefits such as hearing aids and eyeglasses.5
In providing a fixed amount of federal funding per person, this approach to financing would likely result in overwhelming cost shifts to states, state taxpayers, and families unable to shoulder the costs of care without sufficient federal support. This would result in cuts to program eligibility, services, or both ultimately harming some of our nation's most vulnerable citizens.
The bill also repeals the six percent enhanced federal Medicaid match for states that take up the Community First Choice (CFC) Option. CFC provides states with a financial incentive to offer HCBS to help older adults and people with disabilities live in their homes and communities where they want to be. About 90 percent of older adults want to remain in their own homes and communities for as long as possible.6 HCBS are also cost effective. On average, in Medicaid, the cost of HCBS per person is one-third the cost of institutional care.7 Taking away the enhanced match could disrupt services for older adults and people with disabilities in the states that are already providing services under CFC and would result in a loss of about $12 billion for HCBS over ten years.
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)applegrove
(118,665 posts)Demtexan
(1,588 posts)She was very frail.
So many are in nursing homes.
I hope the republicans enjoy taking care of their parents and grandparents.
not fooled
(5,801 posts)DIE peasants DIE
cliffside
(173 posts)that does not segment society, but a plan that has blinders, not one that pits one group against another.
I do not care about your race, religion, sexuality, inherited genes or just chance of nature. Could we focus more on preventable diseases, without a doubt!
We're all in this world together, each time my husband has a bone marrow biopsy he elected to have to an additional sample drawn for research. This is not to benefit him, but those who come after him.
We're in this world together, whether we realize it or not, someone is always helping to make a path forward.
Now is the time for the Dems to step forward with a NHC policy. We'll see if they step forward or make a deal "Billy"
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)both branches of Congress, plus the Presidency, so we can't get anything passed or make any deals without help from a significant number of Republicans.
And they aren't interested in a "NHC policy."