General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe GOP's Latest Health Care Replacement Bill Is Even More Heartless Than First Thought
http://www.alternet.org/economy/gops-latest-health-care-replacement-bill-even-more-heartless-first-thought"...Many people who obtain health insurance through their employersabout half of the countrycould be at risk of losing protections that limit out-of-pocket costs for catastrophic illnesses, due to a little-noticed provision of the House Republican health-care bill to be considered Thursday, health-policy experts say, the WSJ report began. Insurers in states that obtain the waivers [under the House bill] could be freed from a regulation mandating that they cover 10 particular types of health services, among them maternity care, prescription drugs, mental health treatment and hospitalization.
This is not the only surprising analysis thats appeared in the past 24 hours. A New York Times report noted how the bill will take billions away from K-12 public schools thats now used for special education, where specialists are hired to help children with developmental disabilities.
The new law would cut Medicaid by $880 billion, or 25 percent, over 10 years and impose a 'per-capita cap' on funding for certain groups of people, such as children and the elderlya dramatic change that would convert Medicaid from an entitlement designed to cover any costs incurred to a more limited program, the Times reported. School districts receive about $4 billion in Medicaid reimbursements annually.
The winners are, according to the report:
Tax cuts: Gives $600 billion in tax breaks, mostly to the rich and corporations;
Millionaires: Get a $50,000 tax break each year from repeal of the ACAs taxes on the rich. A total of $275 billion in tax cuts goes mostly to the richest 2%;
400 richest families: Each gets a tax cut of $7 million a year, on average;
Insurance companies: Get $145 billion in tax breaks over 10 years;
Drug companies: Get $25 billion in tax breaks over 10 years;
Richest 2%: Get a $117 billion tax cut by eliminating a small Medicare tax on couples with incomes above $250,000 a year.
The losers are:
Health care cuts: Takes health care away from 24 million Americans;
Low-income Americans: Loss of $275 billion in revenue from wealthy tax cuts plays a big role in 14 million low-income kids and seniors losing Medicaid coverage;
Workers: 7 million will lose health care coverage from their employer;
Older Americans: Health insurance companies could increase premiums by up to $13,000 for older Americans;
Patients: No protections from huge drug price increases by pharmaceutical companies;
Medicare beneficiaries: Loss of $117 billion in revenue from wealthy tax cut shortens Medicares ability to pay full benefits by three years.
renate
(13,776 posts)Maybe I'm being wildly optimistic, but I haven't seen a single article anywhere (in the MSM--I don't go to Breitbart etc) saying one positive thing about it, except for one otherwise critical article saying that the income level at which people can get subsidies has gone up. But they're ALL talking about how rape and domestic violence (and basically being female) will be possible pre-existing conditions that will allow insurers to deny coverage.
IIRC, in the Bush era MSM articles about things that happened in Washington used to be pretty poker-faced about whether a policy was crappy or not. Not any more.
The GOP will always have its base because a certain number of people are irretrievably dumb and closed-minded. But friends and families get together and talk, and I just don't see how this could possibly increase the GOP's popularity among those who are even occasionally persuadable.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)They will cut off Obama's nose to spite their ugly faces.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Unless some malcontents keep reminding the American people of the niggling little details in the original post. I'm committed to doing just that.
PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)Wish we could organize something massive on the order of the women's march. They are messing with people's lives.
My coward of a congressman refuses to hold a town hall meeting. I would like to organize a protest outside his church when he is in town on break. Trump wants to allow churches to become political anyway.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)And now we need to do whatever it takes to extract every possible advantage out of their mistakes. They need to PAY!
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)They have no idea as to what they have just done to their own party.