Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
Thu Jul 5, 2012, 11:19 PM Jul 2012

Lawsuit challenges California foie gras ban

AFP - Days after a foie gras ban came into force in California, a Los Angeles restaurant group and others have filed a lawsuit seeking to overturn the bill outlawing the controversial gastronomic delicacy.

Hot's Restaurant Group, Canada's Association des Eleveurs de Canards et d'Oies du Quebec and New York-based producer Hudson Valley Foie Gras claim the ban is "unconstitutional, vague and interferes with federal commerce laws."

California lawmakers agreed the ban in 2004, but gave the western US state's only foie gras producer seven and a half years to comply before it came into effect on July 1 this year.

Restaurants serving the gourmet item -- made from force-feeding ducks or geese -- can be fined up to $1,000.

But the legal challenge claims the 2004 law is unclear in defining what constitutes force-feeding, said attorney Michael Tenenbaum, who filed the lawsuit in Los Angeles this week.

"The Bird Feeding Law does not provide any intelligible measure -- such as weight, volume, or caloric value -- by which those involved in the feeding of the ducks ... may determine at what point a duck has been fed 'more food' than the statute allows," says the lawsuit, cited by the Los Angeles Times.



http://www.france24.com/en/20120706-lawsuit-challenges-california-foie-gras-ban
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawsuit challenges California foie gras ban (Original Post) FarCenter Jul 2012 OP
How hard is it to understand "force" feed. Lionessa Jul 2012 #1
I am on the wrong side of this since I think the ban Motown_Johnny Jul 2012 #2
Duck? I thought it was goose. longship Jul 2012 #3
 

Lionessa

(3,894 posts)
1. How hard is it to understand "force" feed.
Thu Jul 5, 2012, 11:30 PM
Jul 2012

I think that's pretty straight forward. If they eat it willingly, then it isn't forced. If it is forced into them, then it's forced.

Am I misunderstanding something?

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
2. I am on the wrong side of this since I think the ban
Thu Jul 5, 2012, 11:46 PM
Jul 2012

is a bit of an over reach, But.....


When they force feed these birds they put a ring around their necks so they can't regurgitate the food back up/out.

I think we can safely call that force feeding.

The good stuff comes from France anyways. I'm not sure what is up with this law but I can't see banning something imported like that. It isn't like France is subject to California laws.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lawsuit challenges Califo...