...was that, even if the initial offenses were disloyal but not criminal, the actions already taken to cover them up were both disloyal AND clearly criminal.

I watched it twice.

to influence the outcome of an election isn't a crime.

Also, doesn't the DOJ have to state what they are investigating eventually in a timely manner? Why all the secrecy? And how long will the American people have to wait in suspense for anything to be resolved?

and those are breached, it is a crime. It is not a question of loyalty but of a conspiracy to cover up.

It is treasonous. A grand jury may see it differently than these various Republican interpretations?

Quote by Sol Wachtler

How would a jury interpret it?

. . . which would depend on the venue.

WHAT things, David? What they had for breakfast? The latest joke making the rounds in the West Wing? Classified information?

. . . family vacations, yoga routines, etc.

; )

. . . Mueller could set some perjury traps and get some lower level Trump administration indictments for procedural crimes. Think Martha Stewart and Scooter Libby.

There won't be any crime committed if what he's done continues to be down-graded IE: colluding with the ruskies.

Also, it's infuriating as HELL to see how LOW the bar has been set for this fool. For example, hearing most reporters cackle on about how "successful" his trip was abroad.

That putin-loving, treasonous, pathological clown installed into the White House with the help of GOP voter-suppression, ruskie interference and racism IE: dummies who hated the fact that we had Pres. Obama in the White House 8 mostly successful years even though blocked at every turn IS a disastrous MESS everytime he opens that fat, nasty, dumb-ass mouth of his, but when he strings a few sentences together and doesn't throw up on his shoes he's seen as being "successful."

Yeah, there is NO bar for this one to many in the media/press