Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Saviolo

(3,282 posts)
Fri May 26, 2017, 03:24 PM May 2017

As Trump's Problems Mount, Breitbart's Numbers are Cratering

Full article at Vanity Fair here.

From the article:

With its former chairman Steve Bannon as White House chief strategist and plans for an ambitious international expansion, Breitbart was supposed to be on its way to becoming a media behemoth in the Trump era, one with unparalleled access and a passionate audience. “While several publishers have enjoyed an uptick in traffic due to election coverage, we are proud to have built a massive and deeply-rooted community that will remain long after the election cycle fades,” Larry Solov, Breitbart’s C.E.O., predicted back in November.

Early on, Solov’s prediction seemed to be coming true. “Breitbart News is the #45th most trafficked website in the United States, according to rankings from Amazon’s analytics company, Alexa.com,” they wrote on January 9, 2017. “With over two billion pageviews generated in 2016 and 45 million unique monthly visitors, Breitbart News has now surpassed Fox News (#47), Huffington Post (#50), Washington Post (#53), and Buzzfeed (#64) in traffic.” A month later, the site had even greater cause to celebrate. “Breitbart News is now the 29th most trafficked site in the United States, surpassing PornHub and ESPN,” they crowed. In the article, its staffers bragged that their bonkers traffic reflected the site’s cementing a permanent place in American politics. “The numbers speak for themselves,” said Solov. (Many outlets, including The Hive, experienced traffic peaks around Trump’s inauguration.)

Just a few months later, the numbers have a different story to tell. As of May 26, 2017, according to Alexa.com—the same web-ranking analytics company that Breitbart drew its numbers from in January—Fox News is the 64th most-trafficked site in the country. Huffington Post is at 60. Buzzfeed is at 50. The Washington Post, on the strength of a series of eye-popping scoops, is at 41.

Breitbart is in 281st place.

Other conservative media sites have also experienced declines in traffic in recent months, but none as pronounced as Breitbart’s. According to Alexa data, National Review Online, Infowars.com, The Daily Caller, and Drudge Report all saw slumps in their rankings. Over the last week, as Trump was engulfed in the Comey scandal, Fox News’s viewership dropped to third place behind CNN and MSNBC for the first time in 17 years.

But for now, the simplest explanation may be that Breitbart’s traffic struggles reflect the struggles of the man they backed during the election, now mired in the difficulties of governance and scandal. “When you tie yourself to a candidate you shouldn’t be surprised,” said the former staffer. “If the candidate has trouble, you’re going to have trouble. And if your goal is to provide cover for that candidate and the news is about that candidate, it’s going to be difficult to cover the news in a way that’s interesting.”


Looks like there are some troubles on the right wing-o-sphere. People are either smartening up a bit about the insane right-wing coverage, or they're going EVEN FURTHER off the deep end, past Breitbart and straight into InfoWars territory.

Sad. Weak.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As Trump's Problems Mount, Breitbart's Numbers are Cratering (Original Post) Saviolo May 2017 OP
Maybe all the traffic was bots? MattP May 2017 #1
But Sinclair is taking over local news. The truth still faces a big battle sharedvalues May 2017 #2
But local teevee is going the way of the buggy whip, too! angstlessk May 2017 #5
True. But many voters in Michigan, PA, Montana still highly influenced by local news sharedvalues May 2017 #6
True...but broadcast teevee does have limits..not many, but more than cable. angstlessk May 2017 #8
Yes, agreed. sharedvalues May 2017 #10
It would be a damn shame gratuitous May 2017 #3
281 lol Ohioblue22 May 2017 #4
Maybe the loyal Trump based ain't so loyal vlyons May 2017 #7
But Google seems to be pushing Breitbart hvn_nbr_2 May 2017 #9

angstlessk

(11,862 posts)
5. But local teevee is going the way of the buggy whip, too!
Fri May 26, 2017, 03:39 PM
May 2017

The more technically savvy folks become the more they use other means of communicating..not being a vegetable in front of a one way vehicle.

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
10. Yes, agreed.
Fri May 26, 2017, 06:24 PM
May 2017

You're basically stating Obama's strategy -- look past old media, reach out to the Internet, speak to the next generation, and ignore the current media that is on its way out.


That strategy ALMOST worked. HRC lost by a tiny fraction of overall votes.

But we live in the present. The white house and GOP donors are actively trying to make this a one party, authoritarian country. I think we have about a year to take the country back. We must address the current information landscape, I believe.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
3. It would be a damn shame
Fri May 26, 2017, 03:34 PM
May 2017

If someone were to take that November quote from Solov and shove it up his Twitter account.

hvn_nbr_2

(6,486 posts)
9. But Google seems to be pushing Breitbart
Fri May 26, 2017, 04:50 PM
May 2017

Breitbart articles have started appearing on the Google news page. I just sent this feedback to Google: "Breitbart is NOT news. Breitbart is lies, innuendo and wingnut fever dreams. Get Breitbart off the news page."

If you use Google news, there is a link "Send Feedback" at the bottom of the news page.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»As Trump's Problems Mount...