Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,066 posts)
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 12:29 PM Jun 2017

Conservatives torch Comeys credibility ahead of Senate hearing

Conservatives torch Comey’s credibility ahead of Senate hearing
By Katie Glueck


WILMINGTON, N.C.

Washington will be riveted this week by the drama surrounding former FBI Director James Comey’s expected congressional testimony.

But Republicans elsewhere in the country say they couldn’t care less.

snip//

Nationally, both Republican and Democratic lawmakers, operatives and donors have expressed alarm about the complicated, multifaceted issue of Russian involvement in an American election, some of which Comey is expected to speak to this week. Some, like Rep. Mike Simpson, a Republican of Idaho, have vouched for his credibility, especially given reports that he has contemporaneous notes from conversations with Trump.

But at this convention, which offered a snapshot of the Republican grassroots, many considered the broader Russia issue as, at best, a distraction from issues like health care and the economy. And others saw the swirling questions around Russia—including the Comey investigation and coming testimony—as pure partisanship driven by Democrats and the media to undermine the legitimacy of Donald Trump’s victory last November.

“The whole thing with Russia is nonsense,” says Jim Gannon, a GOP activist in North Carolina.

“They’re desperately trying to justify why Hillary Clinton lost other than saying Democratic policies aren’t acceptable to people,” said Gannon. “This whole thing is a pretty desperate attempt at partisan politics. ‘Wow, the Russians swung the election.’ What did they do, come and vote? No.”

U.S. intelligence experts, including former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, have been adamant that Moscow did in fact interfere with the 2016 campaign, and intelligence officials have said Russia pushed for hacking of Democratic officials’ emails. Russian President Vladimir Putin has denied this, saying in a recent interview with NBC’s Megyn Kelly that such an order could have come from anyone, including from Americans.

more...

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article154301829.html

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

samnsara

(17,622 posts)
1. the stale argument that we are mad because we lost doesn't hold up...
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 12:32 PM
Jun 2017

...esp cuz there was only some grumbling after bush won... twice...but not the overall absolute resistance to bush. The reason we are pissed is cuz TRUMP won. My gawd the GOP had a cpl sane candidates and they chose trump. How maddening is that?

emulatorloo

(44,124 posts)
3. Projecting again too.
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 12:38 PM
Jun 2017

"they’re desperately trying to justify why Hillary Clinton lost other than saying Democratic policies aren’t acceptable to people,” said Gannon. “This whole thing is a pretty desperate attempt at partisan politics. ‘Wow, the Russians swung the election.’ What did they do, come and vote? No.”

Translation: we're desperately trying to justify why Trump won, because Republicans policies of taking away health care and raising the deficit by giving tax cuts to the rich aren't acceptable to most people. Our whole project is a pretty desperate attempt at partisan politics and deflection and deceit. "Wow, there is NO EVIDENCE Russia interfered in our election to Help Trump!" Obstruction of Justice Secret backchannels to the FSB are totally common, everybody knows that.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
6. Opening Statements coming from the Rethugs will be,
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 01:00 PM
Jun 2017

Comey has know credibility. Next will be and just for the written record,Lynch and Clinton had secret meetings. The person to watch will be Feinstien.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
9. She seems to set the Tenor of their Meetings for the Dems.
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 01:48 PM
Jun 2017

The Guy who will with out a doubt,given a chance,will be Al Franken. Reason I say that is,Jeff Sessions lied to his face and you will pay the price. After all in the Senate it is all about Seniority.

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)
10. Yes, and I believe she is on the 'Gang of Eight' too, right?
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 02:25 PM
Jun 2017

Which means she is privy to the really super-secret stuff. So is Grassley and I do NOT trust him one bit.
OK, one more question (or two actually).
Are the Senators asking for help from their aides doing research to come up with their questions they will be asking?
And 2. Do they coordinate with all the other Senators to make sure there aren't duplicate questions?
Thanks!

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
13. Was told years back from a Friend who was a
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 03:37 PM
Jun 2017

Congressional Aide,you would be surprised at the number of plain Ignorant Members of congress on most issues. And yes,Democratic Aides compare notes as to not was valuable Q&A time. Don't know about the Rethugs,seems they are handed Chamber of Commerce talking points of position statements.

Takket

(21,572 posts)
7. they didn't seem to have any problem with his credability
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 01:01 PM
Jun 2017

when he was openly and purposefully violating the Hatch Act.

justgamma

(3,666 posts)
12. " What did they do, come and vote? No."
Sun Jun 4, 2017, 02:38 PM
Jun 2017

Well maybe. I'm positive people like this absolutely believe that 4 million people voted illegally. Isn't that what they say?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Conservatives torch Comey...