Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Could you ever vote for someone that professes to believe the world is 6k years old.... (Original Post) WCGreen Jul 2012 OP
Not only no but HELL NO! hobbit709 Jul 2012 #1
.!!! lastlib Jul 2012 #13
No, no and no. Scuba Jul 2012 #2
It is worse than untangling fiction and truth. It is the insistence that the fiction IS the truth RadiationTherapy Jul 2012 #3
Not only that. sadbear Jul 2012 #8
What's worse are the ones who don't believe it but claim to to pander to their base. Gidney N Cloyd Jul 2012 #29
Nope!! Flashmann Jul 2012 #4
ah..no madrchsod Jul 2012 #5
Absolutely not etherealtruth Jul 2012 #6
Never CanonRay Jul 2012 #7
As long as they did not forbid science and their governance was just. mmonk Jul 2012 #9
No. Avalux Jul 2012 #10
Especially considering... ryan_cats Jul 2012 #11
I think it's obvious that Romney is saying whatever he needs to say to get the votes. Baitball Blogger Jul 2012 #12
Principles? SoutherDem Jul 2012 #16
Did Romney say that? Quantess Jul 2012 #14
if they support socialized healhcare, cutting military spending, alternative energy, expanding the Douglas Carpenter Jul 2012 #15
Good point but the two don't go hand in hand. SoutherDem Jul 2012 #17
NO! SoutherDem Jul 2012 #18
No. JHB Jul 2012 #19
Of course not. Faygo Kid Jul 2012 #20
No GreenPartyVoter Jul 2012 #21
Only if I witnessed monkeys flying out of his/her ass. HopeHoops Jul 2012 #22
No. GoCubsGo Jul 2012 #23
no. I would assume they don't really believe it but are just pandering for the moron vote. limpyhobbler Jul 2012 #24
I could not Marrah_G Jul 2012 #25
Denial of basic truths is a pretty solid deal-breaker for me in any election Posteritatis Jul 2012 #26
Not in a million years... pinto Jul 2012 #27
I have a hard time voting for anyone that professes belief in any mythology, including the Bible, Lionessa Jul 2012 #28

RadiationTherapy

(5,818 posts)
3. It is worse than untangling fiction and truth. It is the insistence that the fiction IS the truth
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 08:29 AM
Jul 2012

and a willingness to make policy decisions based on even kookier beliefs.

sadbear

(4,340 posts)
8. Not only that.
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 09:40 AM
Jul 2012

If they can disregard decades (and perhaps even centuries) of scientific discoveries and conclusions, what else can they disregard for the sake of their "religion"?

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,840 posts)
29. What's worse are the ones who don't believe it but claim to to pander to their base.
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 01:32 PM
Jul 2012

I hate liars more than honest kooks.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
5. ah..no
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 09:16 AM
Jul 2012

such a person is incapable of rational thinking and complex problem solving.
my almost one year old grand daughter is just now developing complex thinking.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
10. No.
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 10:10 AM
Jul 2012

Anyone who believes this is true is seriously compromised in their thinking, and religious beliefs will trump all else. I don't want someone who denies scientific fact leading this country.

ryan_cats

(2,061 posts)
11. Especially considering...
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 10:12 AM
Jul 2012

Especially considering that it is really 6023 years, 3 months, 10 days and 6 hours and 23 minutes old; can't he get anything right?

Baitball Blogger

(46,733 posts)
12. I think it's obvious that Romney is saying whatever he needs to say to get the votes.
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 10:17 AM
Jul 2012

How do you become a billionaire without being fluid with your principles?

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
15. if they support socialized healhcare, cutting military spending, alternative energy, expanding the
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 10:27 AM
Jul 2012

safety net, moving away from this unsustainable speculative driven casino economy toward real manufacturing and production and pushing for peace - a just and lasting peace in the Middle East - if they support those things and are determined to bring them about - I don't care if they worship plastic fruit and pray to Captain Kangaroo.

SoutherDem

(2,307 posts)
17. Good point but the two don't go hand in hand.
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 10:33 AM
Jul 2012

Or, at least I have never seen those principles in someone who believes the Earth is 6K.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
24. no. I would assume they don't really believe it but are just pandering for the moron vote.
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 12:40 PM
Jul 2012

Either way I can't vote for them.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
25. I could not
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 12:44 PM
Jul 2012

I cannot vote for anyone who doesn't believe in science.

I have to hold my nose as it is and vote for people who live their lives, make their decisions based on something I believe is a myth, and a dangerous myth at that.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
26. Denial of basic truths is a pretty solid deal-breaker for me in any election
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 12:47 PM
Jul 2012

If someone's a young-Earth creationist, or denies the existence of things like evolution, climate change, the Apollo landing, plate tectonics, etc., they're too ignorant for elected office. There's a bunch of other things on the list, but those are the most obvious ones.

 

Lionessa

(3,894 posts)
28. I have a hard time voting for anyone that professes belief in any mythology, including the Bible,
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 01:24 PM
Jul 2012

the Koran, the Torah, and virtually any script or idea that has no basis in reality.

Unfortunately, as odd person out, I've never had an opportunity to vote for anyone I truly feel is rational and intellectual with his/her feet firmly planted in reality.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Could you ever vote for s...