General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCould you ever vote for someone that professes to believe the world is 6k years old....
I couldn't just on the simple fact that these folks can't seem to untangle fiction from truth.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)and a willingness to make policy decisions based on even kookier beliefs.
sadbear
(4,340 posts)If they can disregard decades (and perhaps even centuries) of scientific discoveries and conclusions, what else can they disregard for the sake of their "religion"?
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,840 posts)I hate liars more than honest kooks.
Flashmann
(2,140 posts)Wouldn't......COULDN'T even consider it.....
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)such a person is incapable of rational thinking and complex problem solving.
my almost one year old grand daughter is just now developing complex thinking.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)CanonRay
(14,104 posts)That trumps (no pun intended) just about any other question.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)Anyone who believes this is true is seriously compromised in their thinking, and religious beliefs will trump all else. I don't want someone who denies scientific fact leading this country.
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)Especially considering that it is really 6023 years, 3 months, 10 days and 6 hours and 23 minutes old; can't he get anything right?
Baitball Blogger
(46,733 posts)How do you become a billionaire without being fluid with your principles?
SoutherDem
(2,307 posts)If he has any his are gaseous.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)safety net, moving away from this unsustainable speculative driven casino economy toward real manufacturing and production and pushing for peace - a just and lasting peace in the Middle East - if they support those things and are determined to bring them about - I don't care if they worship plastic fruit and pray to Captain Kangaroo.
SoutherDem
(2,307 posts)Or, at least I have never seen those principles in someone who believes the Earth is 6K.
SoutherDem
(2,307 posts)Enough said.
Faygo Kid
(21,478 posts)GreenPartyVoter
(72,377 posts)HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)I like my candidates to be scientifically literate.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)Either way I can't vote for them.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)I cannot vote for anyone who doesn't believe in science.
I have to hold my nose as it is and vote for people who live their lives, make their decisions based on something I believe is a myth, and a dangerous myth at that.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)If someone's a young-Earth creationist, or denies the existence of things like evolution, climate change, the Apollo landing, plate tectonics, etc., they're too ignorant for elected office. There's a bunch of other things on the list, but those are the most obvious ones.
pinto
(106,886 posts)Lionessa
(3,894 posts)the Koran, the Torah, and virtually any script or idea that has no basis in reality.
Unfortunately, as odd person out, I've never had an opportunity to vote for anyone I truly feel is rational and intellectual with his/her feet firmly planted in reality.