Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNo correlation between hospital CEO pay and either quality or cost
http://bangordailynews.com/2012/07/06/health/high-pay-for-hospital-ceos-doesnt-spell-better-care-nh-study-finds/print/Everybody agrees the health system needs to improve patient results even as it becomes more efficient. So shouldnt we reward hospital managers who make progress in both areas? That doesnt seem to be the case in New Hampshire, according to a new study from the New Hampshire Center for Public Policy Studies.
At a time when many contend that hospitals should focus on outcomes rather than the volume of care provided, in New Hampshire there is virtually no correlation between hospital [CEO] pay and either quality or cost at nonprofit health systems, the study said.
Given these hospitals exist to provide quality health care and are required to provide community benefit and charitable care in light of their non-profit status, the lack of such a correlation is a significant concern, New Hampshire Attorney General Michael A. Delaney said in a prepared statement this week. The New Hampshire Department of Justice regulates the states nonprofit sector.
Instead, the CEOs compensation packages correlated closely with the size of the institutions they ran, the study found. The bigger the system, the more the CEO generally made. The boss of Lebanons Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital ($1.1 billion in revenue) pulled down $785,000 in 2009, while the CEO of Colebrooks Upper Connecticut Valley Hospital ($15 million in revenue) made $150,000.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1606 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No correlation between hospital CEO pay and either quality or cost (Original Post)
eridani
Jul 2012
OP
Scuba
(53,475 posts)1. Hospital executive pay is not where our healthcare cost problems are...
... nor is it nursing pay, med tech pay, etc.
It's the goddamned insurance industry and thieves like Rick Scott.
There are no doubt some overpaid hospital CEO's, but their compensation is chicken feed compared to ...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002854619
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)3. this really shows the problem I think. nt
eridani
(51,907 posts)4. True, but it is part of the problem n/t
Scuba
(53,475 posts)5. No, it's not.
SoutherDem
(2,307 posts)2. Does any CEO or any executive pay equate quality or cost?
I don't just mean they still get there giant salaries and bonus (which really aren't bonuses) even if the company does bad.
I mean they are not worth the salary to begin with. NO one is. Although many have let me know the possible ways of cheating the system, I support a maximum pay ratio. In other words if your lowest pay employee makes $16,000 their maximum pay may be $500,000. (just an example not the real ratio) if they want more they pay employees more.