Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

obamanut2012

(26,080 posts)
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:00 PM Jun 2017

I know many will disagree with me, but I stand by Ms. Winner

I know releasing classified info can be a slippery slope, but I consider her a patriot, and I pledge to put money on her prison commissary account, because there is no way she won't be imprisoned for this.

Our election was literally hijacked, and we have Fascists running our government. How many times in history could something like this have been stopped if someone stepped forward? So, good on Reality Winner.

I just wish she had went to the WP, who would have protected their source, not that idiot Greenwald. The Intercept has ruined her life.

98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I know many will disagree with me, but I stand by Ms. Winner (Original Post) obamanut2012 Jun 2017 OP
I think she was incredibly brave lovemydogs Jun 2017 #1
Yup obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #5
She's fighting treachery and traitors BSdetect Jun 2017 #25
Yes. She is a patriot. emulatorloo Jun 2017 #67
She is very brave blueseas Jun 2017 #94
She would have been smarter to send it to WaPo. The Intercept outted her.... bettyellen Jun 2017 #2
Oh, I agree with you obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #4
Totally suspicious the Intercept would risk her life doing that. Stupid or malicious? bettyellen Jun 2017 #6
Agree iluvtennis Jun 2017 #45
For her trouble the Intercept is saying it may be fake news- also maybe the gov is lying bettyellen Jun 2017 #50
Link proving the Intercept has said that, please. n/t countryjake Jun 2017 #60
Here you go: emulatorloo Jun 2017 #68
Thank you Em! I saw a longer statement that basically they'd never vouch for the gov or IC bettyellen Jun 2017 #71
I assume Glenn just wants to insinuate the NSA doc is full of 'lies' emulatorloo Jun 2017 #72
Yeah, that sounds likely. Stinks for her.... ironically misplaced trust bettyellen Jun 2017 #74
Here's the link bettyellen Jun 2017 #75
Intercept should be blacklisted now YCHDT Jun 2017 #79
what would be the upside to doing that intentionally? It hurts their own ability to attract leakers JCanete Jun 2017 #83
+1 Patriot NCTraveler Jun 2017 #3
agree obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #10
k&r Starry Messenger Jun 2017 #7
xxx obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #9
I am partially torn... Kleveland Jun 2017 #8
Same here Pacifist Patriot Jun 2017 #12
Desperate times call for desperate measures? Amaryllis Jun 2017 #38
I'm gonna stay consistent justiceischeap Jun 2017 #11
Warner is acting like it helps, we share see obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #18
There are lots of potential unintended consequences loyalsister Jun 2017 #24
I'm for whoever MFM008 Jun 2017 #13
It could easily go the other way loyalsister Jun 2017 #28
I dont assume it will favor anyone MFM008 Jun 2017 #81
Up to 10 years in prison - she does have moxy. jmg257 Jun 2017 #14
I'm surprised it is such a light sentence tbh obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #19
Well it's not like obamachangetheworld Jun 2017 #56
lol obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #62
Are we living in the "twilight Zone" njhoneybadger Jun 2017 #15
Considering the nature of what she leaked I hope the prosecutors show mercy. hrmjustin Jun 2017 #16
He, is a she. nt arthritisR_US Jun 2017 #70
It is a sad situation for her ProudLib72 Jun 2017 #17
I am afraid of that, too obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #20
Sheesh - she just exposed deeper Russia interference. No one will pay because of her leaking. jmg257 Jun 2017 #22
I'm talking about the enablers and colluders ProudLib72 Jun 2017 #23
Unfortunately she did not do anything to expose such people. jmg257 Jun 2017 #26
Maybe (and I do mean Maybe) ProudLib72 Jun 2017 #31
She committed a crime leftynyc Jun 2017 #21
I don't think that'll happen, but I hope her sentence is light obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #46
Hero, too bad the GOP doesnt have any of these. Eliot Rosewater Jun 2017 #27
She's going to federal prison, and her leak accomplished nothing. frankieallen Jun 2017 #89
Hero, who trusted one of the worst persons in the world, Glenn Greenwald. Eliot Rosewater Jun 2017 #97
A hero for leaking a top-secret document about Russia - get this - phishing state voter boards! jmg257 Jun 2017 #98
Since I do not know her specific motive I will say this: oldmanandthesea Jun 2017 #29
exactly obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #47
A different perspective... freemay20 Jun 2017 #30
I was wondering about this too LeftInTX Jun 2017 #36
Maybe... freemay20 Jun 2017 #37
And the Intercept says they don't know if the info she shared was true- and also casts shade on the bettyellen Jun 2017 #40
interesting obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #49
It's not so cut and dried, unfortunately Nevernose Jun 2017 #57
That's the impression I got yesterday, after briefly looking at her FB posts going back to about deurbano Jun 2017 #58
Hmmmmm, thx for this info YCHDT Jun 2017 #80
Things may not always be as they seem... Perhaps she has /will have some connections .... MedusaX Jun 2017 #32
Somethkng cilla4progress Jun 2017 #33
Everything has context mchill Jun 2017 #34
I am transparently pro-whistle blowing. And yes, that is not a uniform view here. NRaleighLiberal Jun 2017 #35
yup obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #51
I am the same. and I don't believe CIA, NSA, FBI are the good guys. nt m-lekktor Jun 2017 #76
I think its best Eko Jun 2017 #39
Agree, except that last part. deurbano Jun 2017 #41
I agree with the discrediting outlets -- it will be interesting what ahppens obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #53
Amazing given the leaks rhetoric coming from Trump and Sessions. L. Coyote Jun 2017 #42
I fear she will be used as an example to discourage anyone else from thinking of doing this. hamsterjill Jun 2017 #43
She's a hero, like Daniel Ellsberg MrPurple Jun 2017 #44
Wouldn't that be nice?! deurbano Jun 2017 #52
Pentagon Papers! obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #54
I'd have to read up on the details, but his lawyers beat the charges MrPurple Jun 2017 #65
She did the right thing, but will still have to pay the price for breaking the law. aikoaiko Jun 2017 #48
exactly obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #63
An act of civil disobedience Nevernose Jun 2017 #55
i agree obamanut2012 Jun 2017 #64
Hell yeah!!! kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2017 #59
Me too! ElementaryPenguin Jun 2017 #61
I admire her courage and believe her heart was in the right place Les Cowbell Jun 2017 #66
I stand with her too. They say that the intel she released would arthritisR_US Jun 2017 #69
Only time will tell if she helped us more than she hurt us... Blue_Tires Jun 2017 #73
Agreed jimlup Jun 2017 #77
Not me...I with her... n/m bagelsforbreakfast Jun 2017 #78
She's a patriot iamateacher Jun 2017 #82
me too. nt TheFrenchRazor Jun 2017 #84
It's very sad that we have a government that has become so corrupt mdbl Jun 2017 #85
Kamikaze patriot Achilleaze Jun 2017 #86
I think she put everything on the line to release something not worth it Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #87
This girl is probably going to federal prison, for some frankieallen Jun 2017 #88
Better than standing with Mr. Loser.. whathehell Jun 2017 #90
I think there's a GoFundMe page on fb for her probably MojoWrkn Jun 2017 #91
THERE IS A GOFUNDME ON FB for her! MojoWrkn Jun 2017 #92
She is a hero in my book. HelenWheels Jun 2017 #93
Reality Winner Catherine Vincent Jun 2017 #95
I stood with Snowden and I will certainly stand with her. lark Jun 2017 #96

lovemydogs

(575 posts)
1. I think she was incredibly brave
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:02 PM
Jun 2017

She put herself on the line to help her country. She wanted the public to be aware that the votes may have been tampered with and was willing to go to jail for her country

BSdetect

(8,998 posts)
25. She's fighting treachery and traitors
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:46 PM
Jun 2017

All power to her.

Daniel Ellsberg was a hero too.

Have you read The Pentagon Papers?

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
2. She would have been smarter to send it to WaPo. The Intercept outted her....
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:03 PM
Jun 2017

And I'm not sure it wasn't an accident.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
6. Totally suspicious the Intercept would risk her life doing that. Stupid or malicious?
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:06 PM
Jun 2017

Either way, fuck them.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
71. Thank you Em! I saw a longer statement that basically they'd never vouch for the gov or IC
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:16 PM
Jun 2017

To be honest about this, and can't verify what they published from the leaker either. Sowing chaos and division, big shocker?

emulatorloo

(44,131 posts)
72. I assume Glenn just wants to insinuate the NSA doc is full of 'lies'
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:35 PM
Jun 2017

All 'manufactured' by the 'deep state' because as all Greenwald fans know, Trump and Putin are the 'innocent victims' here.

I feel so bad for Winter that she got caught in the crossfire.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
74. Yeah, that sounds likely. Stinks for her.... ironically misplaced trust
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:54 PM
Jun 2017

Was her undoing! When he said "trust no one" he means it!

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
83. what would be the upside to doing that intentionally? It hurts their own ability to attract leakers
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 02:35 AM
Jun 2017

to them if they can't protect their sources. This kind of speculation seems mostly born out of a great dislike for Greenwald, not on any evidence or history?

Kleveland

(1,257 posts)
8. I am partially torn...
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:12 PM
Jun 2017

As was stated, leaking national security info is a slippery slope, very slippery.

But sadly, as expressed by Malcom Nance, this info was obviously known, and would come out anyway in the current investigations into you know what. One might say hopefully/allegedly here, I know....

I feel for her personal sacrifice, I really and truly do.

It is obvious that her efforts were selfless.

I cannot condemn her, just wish it were better for her and all concerned.



justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
11. I'm gonna stay consistent
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:18 PM
Jun 2017

I thought it was wrong of Snowden to leak classified info and I think it's wrong for Winner.

The question that needs to be asked is if this leak will harm or impede the ongoing investigation. We have no way of knowing that because we don't have all the pieces.

It also tips our hand to Putin, who may delete or otherwise interfere with any ongoing intelligence that may aid the investigation.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
24. There are lots of potential unintended consequences
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:44 PM
Jun 2017

Being able to see what fails is what guides people to create what works. And, with limited context, it can be exploited politically by 45, who has already made it a cause to go after imagined "voter fraud."

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
28. It could easily go the other way
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:48 PM
Jun 2017

Everyone here seems to assume that it will confirm a narrative that favors Democrats, but it is premature and potentially dangerous to make that assumption.

MFM008

(19,816 posts)
81. I dont assume it will favor anyone
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 01:21 AM
Jun 2017

BUT it will NOT favor the maggot in chief.
He is already frantically trying to create a distraction.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
14. Up to 10 years in prison - she does have moxy.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:20 PM
Jun 2017

Must have been REALLY pissed about Russia hacking to leak that ho-hum report.

njhoneybadger

(3,910 posts)
15. Are we living in the "twilight Zone"
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:21 PM
Jun 2017

Her name is REALITY WINNER wtf
And she sends it to rat-fucker Glen Greenwald

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
16. Considering the nature of what she leaked I hope the prosecutors show mercy.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:21 PM
Jun 2017

Last edited Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:24 PM - Edit history (1)

I also wish she had chosen a better news outlet.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
17. It is a sad situation for her
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:26 PM
Jun 2017

By the end of her sentence (if she actually ever gets out), the history books will have relegated her to a footnote in the tRump/Russia chapter. Meanwhile, the criminals she was exposing will most likely be free.

obamanut2012

(26,080 posts)
20. I am afraid of that, too
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:31 PM
Jun 2017

And, she will never get a decent job again, esp one that needs any type of clearance or clear record.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
22. Sheesh - she just exposed deeper Russia interference. No one will pay because of her leaking.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:37 PM
Jun 2017

Except her.

I am pretty sure Putin & the GRU won't be charged.


"The report indicates that Russian hacking may have penetrated further into U.S. voting systems than was previously understood. It states unequivocally in its summary statement that it was Russian military intelligence, specifically the Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate, or GRU, that conducted the cyber attacks described in the document:"

Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate actors … executed cyber espionage operations against a named U.S. company in August 2016, evidently to obtain information on elections-related software and hardware solutions. … The actors likely used data obtained from that operation to … launch a voter registration-themed spear-phishing campaign targeting U.S. local government organizations.

"This NSA summary judgment is sharply at odds with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s denial last week that Russia had interfered in foreign elections:..."

https://theintercept.com/2017/06/05/top-secret-nsa-report-details-russian-hacking-effort-days-before-2016-election/

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
23. I'm talking about the enablers and colluders
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:43 PM
Jun 2017

Of course Putin will still be riding horses topless while she is in prison.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
26. Unfortunately she did not do anything to expose such people.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:46 PM
Jun 2017

Now THAT would have been something!


ETA. Ah well - maybe with the depth of the cyber-attacks being known/shown eventually, we can actually respond in a meaningful way.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
31. Maybe (and I do mean Maybe)
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:55 PM
Jun 2017

it means that the Russians will not be getting those compounds back. Short term goals...

It should really mean that we overhaul our voting mechanisms.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
21. She committed a crime
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:35 PM
Jun 2017

but my hope is she gets some kick ass lawyer to sway the jury into nullification. My sister and I were talking about it last night and both think Ron Kuby would be perfect.

 

frankieallen

(583 posts)
89. She's going to federal prison, and her leak accomplished nothing.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 07:33 AM
Jun 2017

Don't you think she is wishing she didn't do something so foolish? She is currently sitting in jail, and her mommy doesn't understand why, she f'd up big time.

This is very serious for her.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,112 posts)
97. Hero, who trusted one of the worst persons in the world, Glenn Greenwald.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 01:15 PM
Jun 2017

Glenn works for Putin so his outing her makes sense.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
98. A hero for leaking a top-secret document about Russia - get this - phishing state voter boards!
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 01:18 PM
Jun 2017

Hoo rah!

oldmanandthesea

(39 posts)
29. Since I do not know her specific motive I will say this:
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:51 PM
Jun 2017

Leaking, or whistle blowing , is like any other civil disobedience in that one must be prepared for the consequences. Her arrest and prosecution is to be expected. Seems to me, in this case, she was let down by the "news outlet" that she leaked to. They did little to protect their source.

freemay20

(243 posts)
30. A different perspective...
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:54 PM
Jun 2017

When whistleblowers leak information that they believe citizens should know, I'm usually torn as well. Of course we acknowledge it's a crime, but the information being revealed is often critically important.

However, in speaking with a friend in the IC, he pointed out a few things about this case.

Her social media (her *likes* and her posts) indicate a very favorable impression of Russia and Putin, as we've learned about many on the left.

The Intercept is known to be rather favorable toward Putin.

So her leaking it there may not have been for the benefit of the US citizens, but instead benefit to Putin, revealing the methods of how NSA was tracking Russian hacking and progress.

The IC and law and order peeps are always upset about leakers and see it as pure criminality, but in this case the purpose of her sharing it may be more nefarious and not for our benefit at all.

LeftInTX

(25,381 posts)
36. I was wondering about this too
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 02:27 PM
Jun 2017

ETA: OTOH if the purpose was to provide documents to Russia, why send them to a public forum, The Intercept? She could have contacted someone in Russia and sent them privately.

freemay20

(243 posts)
37. Maybe...
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 02:37 PM
Jun 2017

Seems she was an entry-level contractor, so perhaps it was easier?

And without diving into a DU war, there are many who perceive Greenwald and The Intercept (and other "left"-leaning outfits) as mouthpieces for Putin. She'd have easier access to them.

So there's that.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
40. And the Intercept says they don't know if the info she shared was true- and also casts shade on the
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 02:50 PM
Jun 2017

IC. So they're pushing the "trust no one" crap, same as Trump and Putin.

deurbano

(2,895 posts)
58. That's the impression I got yesterday, after briefly looking at her FB posts going back to about
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:32 PM
Jun 2017

January. I don't actually have FB myself (everyone else in my immediate family does, and they let me "spy" through their accounts when need be), but I think her posts must have been "public," because anyone could comment on them, and the 45 lovers were having a field day trashing her. Her posts made her seem idealistic and compassionate, with a spiritual bent. Someone here (I think) said she had some anti-Clinton posts (supposedly, she was for Sanders), but I didn't get that far back on her FB. (Is there a way to skip the in-between posts, and go back to a specific date? There were so many 45 trolls adding ugly comments that it took a long time just to get to January.)

From your link:

<<On Facebook and Instagram, Winner documented her pets, travels to Belize and to her adopted home of Baltimore, her hours in the gym, vegan meals, concerts and the apparent recent death of her dad. On Twitter, she laid bare her liberal political views and the raw emotion she felt over the election of Donald Trump as president.

Tweeting at Trump after comments he made about refugees being a danger, Winner, under the handle @reezlie, wrote: “the most dangerous entry to this country was the orange fascist we let into the white house (sic).”

Her feeds show forceful views on climate change, refugees, the war in Syria and her distinct dislike of Trump and his policies. She also showed support for the citizens of one of the nation’s top adversaries….

…Trump supporters took to Winner’s social media pages, leaving comments calling her a traitor, mocking her parents and fantasizing what will happen to her if she goes to prison.>>

mchill

(1,018 posts)
34. Everything has context
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 02:20 PM
Jun 2017

As far as I'm concerned we are in a special circumstance and the worst I see is that she was a valuable asset to the Intelligence community, being fluent in 3 Middle East languages, and this country lost her skills because of the idiot and dangerous orange boy in the WH.

deurbano

(2,895 posts)
41. Agree, except that last part.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 03:22 PM
Jun 2017

We only have the account of those charging her under the Espionage Act (and to me, this is only "espionage" against Russia)... but if their account is true, it seems her goose was cooked, no matter what, since she wasn't very savvy about concealing her identity. (They said she subscribed to Intercept podcasts using her gmail account, for example.) If their account is not true, there may be an agenda-- like to discredit media outlets receiving leaked information and scare off future whistleblowers. I really don't understand their motivation in providing so many details about how they identified her.

hamsterjill

(15,222 posts)
43. I fear she will be used as an example to discourage anyone else from thinking of doing this.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 03:51 PM
Jun 2017

She's very young, and I hate to see that happen.

For me, personally, I'm glad she did what she did. SOMEONE has to do something. Our very lives are at stake. That's not being overly dramatic either. Our way of life and thus our lives should we decided to try to defend that way of life are on the chopping block.

We all know something wasn't right about the 2016 election.

MrPurple

(985 posts)
65. I'd have to read up on the details, but his lawyers beat the charges
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:52 PM
Jun 2017

He did break the law and release classified info and Nixon definitely wanted him put away.

aikoaiko

(34,172 posts)
48. She did the right thing, but will still have to pay the price for breaking the law.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 03:59 PM
Jun 2017

I too wish she had gone to WP or NYT.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
55. An act of civil disobedience
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:02 PM
Jun 2017

No one was harmed and she didn't do it for the money.

She was a concerned patriot who harmed no one.

 

Les Cowbell

(84 posts)
66. I admire her courage and believe her heart was in the right place
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:03 PM
Jun 2017

I just hope she doesn't have to go to jail.

arthritisR_US

(7,288 posts)
69. I stand with her too. They say that the intel she released would
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:33 PM
Jun 2017

have eventually been released to the public but I have no faith in what they say.

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
77. Agreed
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 11:32 PM
Jun 2017

But I do think she is young and naive and hasn't fully realized the consequences of her actions for her personally.

My guess is that her calculation was that whatever happened to her was of small consequence compared to the collective gain of knowing the extent of the Russian hacking. She is right but she will pay a dear price. We should supporter her as best we can.

mdbl

(4,973 posts)
85. It's very sad that we have a government that has become so corrupt
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 06:16 AM
Jun 2017

that those charged with protecting it are afraid that keeping quiet will just allow it to get worse. That's what happens when there is a bunch of abusers in power who have no reverence for justice or our constitution.

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
86. Kamikaze patriot
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 06:30 AM
Jun 2017

She had to know she would soon be busted. But she also knew that the russians and republicans are busy at work on the dark side trying to overthrow American democracy. She did it for the country.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
87. I think she put everything on the line to release something not worth it
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 06:33 AM
Jun 2017

I suspect most people haven't actually looked hard at what she leaked.

It didn't actually expose any manipulation of the election. Only attempts to gain access to to voter registration rolls. With no findings that they had any success.

But if you were paying attention you already knew this. The Obama administration was warning every county election office that this was happening and to be vigilant well before the election.

So we didn't learn anything new other than a few specific details of the how. Because we already knew they were doing this, the Obama Administration first warned the targets and later they put punitive measures in place against Russia for what they did.

So what, really, did we learn from this leaked document that was new? If you have been paying attention very little other than some specific details of the how.

And do those details change anything?

All that makes me think this was a foolish choice of a leak to destroy her future and sacrifice her freedoms over. There wasn't any whistleblower value here in reality because it didn't tell us anything new.

And as someone who works in a field requiring a security clearance my personal standard is that when you accept the position of trust to have access you don't violate that trust unless it's really something that is earth shattering the people need to know and no other means are available to deal with it.

This isn't that. Not even close.

To further cement that this isn't worthy of a leak and what she did, this wasn't a Trump Administration secrete. This all happened and was dealt with under President Obama. So the people who need to know on our side already know, and President Obama knew all this when he took his actions against Russia. He did not feel the need to release this information then because he either felt it would dmamage further investigation or would harm ongoing attempts to monitor Russian hackers by exposing how we do it. I trusted his judgement then and still do now.

 

frankieallen

(583 posts)
88. This girl is probably going to federal prison, for some
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 07:14 AM
Jun 2017

amount of years. Her life is f**ked, and for what? There was nothing in that document we didn't know, or at least would of know soon. She will be a felon, probably convicted of espionage against the United States.
I feel sorry for her, she is very young and I doubt she had any idea what she was getting in to.
Even if she is allowed to plea, and does no jail time, she is still a felon, convicted of crimes against the United States. Good luck with your career.

MojoWrkn

(139 posts)
91. I think there's a GoFundMe page on fb for her probably
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 09:56 AM
Jun 2017

to use for attorney's fees! I can and will donate! This young lady had the power of her convictions and possibly helped impeach the orange One!

MojoWrkn

(139 posts)
92. THERE IS A GOFUNDME ON FB for her!
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 10:06 AM
Jun 2017

Her goal being $10k and she's over $8k right now! Rosie O'Donnell donated $1K so I'm sure she'll meet her goal.

lark

(23,105 posts)
96. I stood with Snowden and I will certainly stand with her.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 12:04 PM
Jun 2017

I support whistleblowers in general as necessary to hold the powerful accountable.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I know many will disagree...