NYTimes: The Lawless Presidency
Democracy isnt possible without the rule of law the idea that consistent principles, rather than a rulers whims, govern society.
You can read Aristotle, Montesquieu, John Locke or the Declaration of Independence on this point. You can also look at decades of American history. Even amid bitter fights over what the law should say, both Democrats and Republicans have generally accepted the rule of law.
President Trump does not. His rejection of it distinguishes him from any other modern American leader. He has instead flirted with Louis XIVs notion of Létat, cest moi: The state is me and Ill decide which laws to follow.
This attitude returns to the fore this week, with James Comey scheduled to testify on Thursday about Trumps attempts to stifle an F.B.I. investigation. I realize that many people are exhausted by Trump outrages, some of which resemble mere buffoonery. But I think its important to step back and connect the dots among his many rejections of the rule of law.
LAW ENFORCEMENT, POLITICIZED.
. . .White House officials arent supposed to pick up the phone and call whomever they want at the (Justice) department. There is a careful process. Trump has erased this distinction.
He pressured Comey to drop the investigation of Trumps campaign and fired Comey when he refused. Trump has called for specific prosecutions, first of Hillary Clinton and more recently of leakers.
COURTS, UNDERMINED.
Past administrations have respected the judiciary as having the final word on the law. Trump has tried to delegitimize almost any judge who disagrees with him.
His latest Twitter tantrum, on Monday, took a swipe at the courts over his stymied travel ban.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/06/opinion/the-lawless-presidency.html