Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 03:18 PM Jun 2017

You Do Realize They Probably Changed The Election Results

All those states that Clinton was comfortably ahead, which is why everyone thought she was going to win in a landslide, were probably flipped through the Russian hacking.

Of course, nobody is saying this, because the last time electronic fraud was suggested back in 2004, they were labeled as crazy conspiracy weirdos.

Don't ask me how they did it, I know little about these things. It just makes sense, that if you really want to manipulate and WIN an election that you're destined to lose, one must be dedicated until the end. Why bother working so hard to hack for months and months, only to fall short when it counts?

I guess after living through 2004, I'm perhaps gullible to believing things like this. But I'm guessing that for those who did, 2016 was EERILY similar in how election night transpired. The only thing missing was karl rove coming on to yell that it was too early to believe Clinton was going to stay ahead.

The funny thing is, even if this were somehow proven down the line, nothing would come of it. You would think that in a Democracy, a fraudulent election would not be allowed to stand. But deep down I wonder if there is a belief the election was truly stolen, but nobody dare say anything.

205 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You Do Realize They Probably Changed The Election Results (Original Post) SoCalMusicLover Jun 2017 OP
Not yet, but drip by drip, it will all come out. Patience is a virtue so they say. monmouth4 Jun 2017 #1
I agree, but the problem is.. BamaRefugee Jun 2017 #30
with a complicit and treasonous Republican Party. n/t SleeplessinSoCal Jun 2017 #71
Totally agree that .... LenaBaby61 Jun 2017 #106
We need paper ballots with itcfish Jun 2017 #169
I don't think so. The "govt" will NEVER admit Russia was successful. Honeycombe8 Jun 2017 #121
Funny thing about that faith is, the fix is to actually fix the elections. Crash2Parties Jun 2017 #137
And why wouldn't citizens lose faith in our election system? YOHABLO Jun 2017 #146
Yes and this is why we must demand the truth and justice. delisen Jun 2017 #2
Seemed a lot like the "Kerry flip" of 2004 Greybnk48 Jun 2017 #3
Or the Gore purge of 2000 YCHDT Jun 2017 #7
Gore was a little less blatant, but horrible nevertheless. Greybnk48 Jun 2017 #39
If the Supreme Court hadn't stolen the election for him the Florida legislature would have. (eom) StevieM Jun 2017 #200
Volusia County. That was the first electronic hack. ElementaryPenguin Jun 2017 #63
PA was like that for Trump and Toomey IronLionZion Jun 2017 #26
I read somewhere....... SergeStorms Jun 2017 #133
and Nate Silver showing HRC winning Marthe48 Jun 2017 #58
I've known that it was only a matter of time TheDebbieDee Jun 2017 #4
They fucked with the voter rules just like they did in Florida in 2000 !!! That's something NO ONE YCHDT Jun 2017 #5
I sensed it by 8 PM election night. The election was stolen. NRaleighLiberal Jun 2017 #6
The fact that somebody took down DU suggests that they didn't want any quick Baitball Blogger Jun 2017 #14
Yes, they did not want us to check in real time. Madam45for2923 Jun 2017 #18
+1000. byronius Jun 2017 #20
+1 musette_sf Jun 2017 #29
+1 n/t jaysunb Jun 2017 #36
+1 (n/t) FreepFryer Jun 2017 #79
1,000. times yes. suffragette Jun 2017 #101
this mopinko Jun 2017 #105
WOW DU went down ?!?!?!? YCHDT Jun 2017 #109
Yup progree Jun 2017 #119
THAT'S some scary shit ! Makes this all the more real, of course cut the left off from communicating YCHDT Jun 2017 #122
Gee, funny, isn't it. calimary Jun 2017 #118
YAS! There were motherfuckers here saying DU isn't big enough to bother with LaydeeBug Jun 2017 #129
LOL! Baitball Blogger Jun 2017 #150
CORRECTION: They WERE Moscow mules that night! Raster Jun 2017 #163
absolutely! nt LaydeeBug Jun 2017 #182
Absolutely a key piece of evidence Justice Jun 2017 #138
It was organized and coordinated to happen on election day IronLionZion Jun 2017 #148
+1000 Raster Jun 2017 #162
DITTO! 50 Shades Of Blue Jun 2017 #107
THANK YOU. nt LaydeeBug Jun 2017 #8
No just of the president but of some house and senate races too. And I want it put back to the way Maraya1969 Jun 2017 #9
Knocking voters off voter rolls is every Ilsa Jun 2017 #10
Yep..... SergeStorms Jun 2017 #136
Two words... kag Jun 2017 #157
Your country who espouses democracy at every turn should arthritisR_US Jun 2017 #11
lol Russian hackers are everywhere m.summers Jun 2017 #12
Russia made it their business to be everywhere. Lot cheaper than a war. Madam45for2923 Jun 2017 #21
LOL. 5 posts. Russian hackers ARE everywhere mainer Jun 2017 #22
+1 trentwestcott Jun 2017 #80
nice joke m.summers Jun 2017 #81
And trolls too IronLionZion Jun 2017 #27
LOL, eh? SammyWinstonJack Jun 2017 #51
It's just another massive conspiracy by the NSA and the deep state... .99center Jun 2017 #82
LOL. Fuck off, Putinbot. Maven Jun 2017 #103
weak eShirl Jun 2017 #154
Fuck yes, they did. Baitball Blogger Jun 2017 #13
May I ask......? suston96 Jun 2017 #15
Russians din't need to fix the vote counts, Republicans had that covered already. L. Coyote Jun 2017 #16
THIS +100,000,000...and who can forget Walden O'Dell's famous line from 2003 fundraiser diva77 Jun 2017 #75
OH 2004 was 70% punch card. That was the problem. L. Coyote Jun 2017 #97
Interesting - did not know that. Thanks for info. diva77 Jun 2017 #104
The powers that be want people to believe triron Jun 2017 #17
"Frankly" speaking SHRED Jun 2017 #84
I agree with you get the red out Jun 2017 #19
I've known since election night. librechik Jun 2017 #23
And they forgot the 2006, 2008 and 2012 elections? mythology Jun 2017 #24
No, They Didn't Forget SoCalMusicLover Jun 2017 #42
I love Hillary, but the DNC was dysfunctional. Both her Alice11111 Jun 2017 #62
This again? If the election was stolen...the DNC is not at fault. Demsrule86 Jun 2017 #142
Distinguish between the many differt factors. It isn't one Alice11111 Jun 2017 #179
Hillary campaigned furiously in Pennsylvania and her ads were everywhere. StevieM Jun 2017 #201
Didn't Michael Moore warn us about rust belt voters going for trump and njhoneybadger Jun 2017 #68
Local office holders alerted the campaign. loyalsister Jun 2017 #83
Yes! It doesn't mean they didn't cheat, they did. The DNC Alice11111 Jun 2017 #181
Absolutely. He went on every show possible, even an options Alice11111 Jun 2017 #180
He did say that and people here savaged him for him. n/t QC Jun 2017 #192
Hillary campaigned furiously in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Both candidates scaled back their StevieM Jun 2017 #198
2016 True Blue American Jun 2017 #177
Hillary campaigned furiously in Pennsylvania. (eom) StevieM Jun 2017 #199
Diebold voting machine - how they can be hacked on 30 seconds iluvtennis Jun 2017 #25
2000 started the whole thing benld74 Jun 2017 #28
Yep - and still nothing has been done to fix it. We've had 3 people screwed out of the presidency kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2017 #38
It's Merely Coincidence That Voting Machine Companies Are Owned By Repubs SoCalMusicLover Jun 2017 #43
Need to say it with zest,,, benld74 Jun 2017 #114
I definitely think Michigan was stolen. Tatiana Jun 2017 #31
Every single voting machine in Michigan MichMary Jun 2017 #56
Only 40% of Michigan's precincts were re-tallied. There wasn't a full hand-counted recount. Tatiana Jun 2017 #60
Based on these figures MichMary Jun 2017 #65
Yes, the "extra" votes found in Wayne County were most likely for Clinton nt MichMan Jun 2017 #77
We can defeat Agent Orange when more truth comes out about this election n/t AntiFascist Jun 2017 #32
Quote workinclasszero Jun 2017 #33
No, I don't BeyondGeography Jun 2017 #34
Yes & Yes SoCalMusicLover Jun 2017 #45
Here's where we're at BeyondGeography Jun 2017 #47
Unsupported conspiracy theory... brooklynite Jun 2017 #35
The NSA report made it clear in several places that this was POSSIBLE. pnwmom Jun 2017 #41
I wouldn't go that far Bradical79 Jun 2017 #93
This is why believe that States Mme. Defarge Jun 2017 #37
This is brilliant! crud Jun 2017 #86
Haven't voters living in States that played by the rules Mme. Defarge Jun 2017 #111
Yep. EXIT POLLS DON'T LIE! Do you think Putin was content to run a respectable 2nd place? ElementaryPenguin Jun 2017 #40
repub Spin - You Can't Rely On Exit Polls SoCalMusicLover Jun 2017 #48
You said it well, SoCal. ElementaryPenguin Jun 2017 #53
Yep - the exit polls were pretty much on. They match the results well. jmg257 Jun 2017 #49
Of course they did. Lil Missy Jun 2017 #44
I would give it better than a 50/50 chance based on the low probability Trump was supposed to Quixote1818 Jun 2017 #46
EXACTLY! SoCalMusicLover Jun 2017 #52
That bugs me treestar Jun 2017 #95
More and more info emerges - so maybe there will be actual proof of it. jmg257 Jun 2017 #50
Russia Will Suffer Our Wrath? SoCalMusicLover Jun 2017 #54
Oh yes - our election was repeatedly, blatantly cyber-attacked by a dangerous adversary. jmg257 Jun 2017 #55
Well, I said it the MORNING after the election, that simply there are WAY more of us Eliot Rosewater Jun 2017 #57
I'll never forget the stunned looks on the faces of most of the election experts that night... ElementaryPenguin Jun 2017 #59
Part of the collusion was Trump campaign telling Russians which counties to hack in swing states ElementaryPenguin Jun 2017 #61
Da. FailureToCommunicate Jun 2017 #64
Absolutey it was eerily similart to 2004. They call it a red shift. You're sittng there watching and Amaryllis Jun 2017 #66
Trade that extra "t" in for an "l." n/t rzemanfl Jun 2017 #88
Stolen election.. mountain grammy Jun 2017 #67
Interesting, isn't it? Mr.Bill Jun 2017 #69
"the system is rigged!" jpak Jun 2017 #70
Solution: paper ballots, hand counts. Done. Eyeball_Kid Jun 2017 #72
Need Some Kind Of Evidence DallasNE Jun 2017 #73
Yep, they couldn't have flipped them to Trump, that would have been to hard to Dream Girl Jun 2017 #76
There were not 70K in Wayne county MichMan Jun 2017 #85
I'm Seeing Very Different Results DallasNE Jun 2017 #131
I didnt list the absentee, just those from election day MichMan Jun 2017 #194
What My Totals Were Showing DallasNE Jun 2017 #204
"Mathematically Possible" does not equal Really Happened lol MichMan Jun 2017 #205
I agree with you. Michigan (especially Detroit) has always been suspicious to me. Tatiana Jun 2017 #123
Got it, no evidence to support any of your suspicions MichMan Jun 2017 #195
It is your final paragraph that gives me pause. Quanta Jun 2017 #74
So they did it in 2004 and 2016, but not in 2008 and 2012? Why? trentwestcott Jun 2017 #78
If it's a good hack you won't find evidence JCMach1 Jun 2017 #87
Yes, first Obama covered up a stolen election then he fucked off to Tahiti BeyondGeography Jun 2017 #89
COUP. Say it; use it WinkyDink Jun 2017 #90
The elections were stolen malaise Jun 2017 #91
I'm from Wisconsin and I knew something happened on election night. milestogo Jun 2017 #92
Yes 1000 times yes! jimlup Jun 2017 #94
As the old saying goes: In for a penny; in for a pound. procon Jun 2017 #96
Stalin said the real power is in the hands of the people who count the votes egold2604 Jun 2017 #98
Yep, I don't buy PA results. She should have won. johnnyrocket Jun 2017 #99
Who are the holdouts? Who is suppressing the obvious? gtar100 Jun 2017 #100
The lesson learned from 2004 was to keep one's powder dry and to let stopbush Jun 2017 #102
Democrats in Congress probably know that votes were flippeed and probably thought INdemo Jun 2017 #108
Oh, yes ailsagirl Jun 2017 #110
The 2016 Coup RicROC Jun 2017 #112
That's what I have said all along blueinredohio Jun 2017 #113
That's what I've always believed. Little Star Jun 2017 #115
YES. I HAVE BEEN SAYING THIS ALL ALONG SINCE NOVEMBER. joanbarnes Jun 2017 #116
Yes and it will probably be one of those things that gets buried dflprincess Jun 2017 #117
Yes. nt Honeycombe8 Jun 2017 #120
I personally believe this has been going on for quite a while. We had to have the "hanging chads" southerncrone Jun 2017 #124
They cannot win blue-wave Jun 2017 #125
I think they ran it out of Houston, but it matters little, they did it. ucrdem Jun 2017 #126
Ran What Out Of Houston? SoCalMusicLover Jun 2017 #135
Project Alamo. ucrdem Jun 2017 #140
The thing is I can't with any confidence say it didn't happen. TDale313 Jun 2017 #127
There is another problem Dan Jun 2017 #128
The Diebold machines in OH in 2004 secondwind Jun 2017 #130
Connection Between Voting Machines & Registrations? SoCalMusicLover Jun 2017 #132
Come To Think Of It, They Were ALL Over Those Computer Systems Prior To Election Day SoCalMusicLover Jun 2017 #134
I'd like to ask a statistician about the probability of.. mvd Jun 2017 #139
Sorry, but statistics are not helping here... TomVilmer Jun 2017 #141
I don't believe Comey and Rogers at all mvd Jun 2017 #159
I do not believe them either... TomVilmer Jun 2017 #164
Right now it is just a feeling.. mvd Jun 2017 #165
No he loves himself. Demsrule86 Jun 2017 #143
kick. nt LaydeeBug Jun 2017 #144
This much I know quaker bill Jun 2017 #145
Agree! Computers for election counting is not working correctly. UCmeNdc Jun 2017 #147
We know there was media manipulation, for sure sharedvalues Jun 2017 #149
I believed the election was hacked and/or rigged from Election Night when the imbecile won. linnknee Jun 2017 #151
And the Republicans in Congress Now MAKE ME SICK - I hate them as much as the asshole. linnknee Jun 2017 #152
Russian influence and Comey's stupidity gave Trump the election. Nitram Jun 2017 #153
A family member of mine does hi-tech stuff for DARPA DFW Jun 2017 #155
NO TRUER WORDS: They know that in a fairly held election, they lose. Raster Jun 2017 #183
Disgusting and Dangerous DownriverDem Jun 2017 #156
HRC lost MI by 13K votes. All they'd have to do is flip a few per precinct & nobody's the wiser. catbyte Jun 2017 #158
But I was told DT won because the Democratic party "failed" and HRC was a horrible candidate! ehrnst Jun 2017 #160
I'm just glad we all seem to be back PDittie Jun 2017 #161
The big question for me is: What happens if there was tampering?? Amimnoch Jun 2017 #166
Here's a hint: read the Constitution brooklynite Jun 2017 #168
Well thank you captain obvious. Amimnoch Jun 2017 #170
ANother OBVIOUS comment... brooklynite Jun 2017 #171
So I guess laws and judicial precedent is nonexistent? Amimnoch Jun 2017 #172
I'm not being snarky; I'm being blunt brooklynite Jun 2017 #173
Thank you. Amimnoch Jun 2017 #176
Post removed Post removed Jun 2017 #167
They must have hacked the exit polls too...they were petty much nuts on. jmg257 Jun 2017 #174
No, they weren't. nt LaydeeBug Jun 2017 #185
Uh huh! nt jmg257 Jun 2017 #186
Nah-uh. nt LaydeeBug Jun 2017 #187
:) LOL! Cheers! nt jmg257 Jun 2017 #188
No, the exit polls predicted a Hillary win. athena Jun 2017 #189
Go to CNN exit polls - most states are dead nuts on. jmg257 Jun 2017 #190
You seem to be confusing "projection" with "exit poll". athena Jun 2017 #191
Ah interesting...here is what CNN said about Michigan... jmg257 Jun 2017 #193
Could we cut back on the auto-pessimism?...I mean, why say whathehell Jun 2017 #175
This thread jumped the shark LOL snooper2 Jun 2017 #178
Yup. they stoled it. Bonx Jun 2017 #184
There are no ballots to recount, because they never existed. Orsino Jun 2017 #196
And I believe Trump when he says how surprised he was on Election Night. Orsino Jun 2017 #197
K&R. dchill Jun 2017 #202
I have never trusted the electronic voting machines Butterflies Jun 2017 #203

BamaRefugee

(3,483 posts)
30. I agree, but the problem is..
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:16 PM
Jun 2017

while we wait, probably right up to the 2018 elections, the Russians are working non-stop to perfect their techniques even more, ensuring yet another election going their way.

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
106. Totally agree that ....
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 07:54 PM
Jun 2017

The ruskies ARE and have been working on NEW techniques to help this administration STAY in power.

Also, what the IC said about russian meddling probably being bigger than what was imagined is NO shock to me (About a month before the election night Nov. 8th, I had begun reading Malcolm Nance's book: The Plot To Hack America-great book which told of this ruskie hacking BEFORE it happened. Chapter 9, especially chilling). I've always thought something was 'wrong' from the very start after Hillary's loss. Hillary had solid leads going by almost EVERY person I was following up TO election night in the 3 states (PA, WI, MI.) she ended up losing by about 70,000 votes combined, and we've since found out that hundreds of THOUSANDS of Dem votes were either crosschecked or purged off of Dem voting rolls--and who in hell knows what happens in Ohio (Post-2004) and Florida (Post-2000) with Dem votes.

Crosscheck Removed 450K Voters in MI, 270 K in AZ and 590 K in NC!!

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/11/14/1599330/-Crosscheck-Removed-450K-Voters-in-MI-270-K-in-AZ-and-590-K-in-NC

Under THIS rotten, crooked, ruskie-influenced, tRumputin DOJ, the GOP IS going to be voter-suppressing Dems off the CHAIN in 2018--and with ruskie "assistance" of course. How we overcome this, I have no earthly clue, because even IF Dems and Indy's turn up and turn out in massive numbers to vote, we know the GOP will just ramp up their voter-crosschecking, voter-purging (New anti-Dem voter ID laws in WI.) and whatever russia will be doing to help out this next time around to take away "enough" numbers so the thuglicans win in certain states AGAIN. This beauguard-lead DOJ won't lift a finger to see that Dems aren't voter-suppressed, even if there IS credible evidence given to them. At time, my stomach gets queasy just thinking about HOW we're going to be able to vote in a fair way in 2018 & 2020.

itcfish

(1,828 posts)
169. We need paper ballots with
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 12:11 PM
Jun 2017

receipts, they can not tamper with that. The results are not that quick but they are more tamper proof IMO

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
121. I don't think so. The "govt" will NEVER admit Russia was successful.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 10:37 PM
Jun 2017

It would be admitting that Russia DID gain control of our election process, and it would cause the citizens to lose faith in our election system.

Some will know, and they will never say, except MAYBE on their death beds. But probably not.

Crash2Parties

(6,017 posts)
137. Funny thing about that faith is, the fix is to actually fix the elections.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 02:16 AM
Jun 2017

We can make a $0.25 transaction (plus fees) at a checkout counter secure and able to pass an audit. But as a nation, we allow voting machines & tally systems that have been proven for a decade to be insecure. And I don't mean hackable; it should go without saying that they should be protected from outside hacks. I'm talking about systems that are trivial to manipulate at the machine level and then again at the county tally level with no audit trail, no record of anything other than the totals. And - go figure - the worst systems tend to be used in Red states, especially in the grossly redrawn Dem district(s).

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
146. And why wouldn't citizens lose faith in our election system?
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 06:33 AM
Jun 2017

We've had three general elections stolen from the Dems: Bush v Gore, Bush v Kerry, and now Trump v Clinton. All because of right wing nefarious circumstances.

Greybnk48

(10,168 posts)
3. Seemed a lot like the "Kerry flip" of 2004
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 03:23 PM
Jun 2017

when the election results were blacked out for 4 hours and then, voila! Bush won! Wisconsin was like that this year for Trump AND Ron Johnson.

Greybnk48

(10,168 posts)
39. Gore was a little less blatant, but horrible nevertheless.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:31 PM
Jun 2017

The Supreme Court gave Bush the election.

ElementaryPenguin

(7,800 posts)
63. Volusia County. That was the first electronic hack.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:06 PM
Jun 2017

So we then put the electronic voting in EVERYWHERE!!!

SergeStorms

(19,204 posts)
133. I read somewhere.......
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 02:02 AM
Jun 2017

that a total of 80,000 combined votes in key districts was enough to swing Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Ohio. Mysteriously, all of those districts, and those states, turned red for Trump. Coincidence? I think not.

Marthe48

(16,975 posts)
58. and Nate Silver showing HRC winning
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:53 PM
Jun 2017

until stopping the updates on his site and disappearing around 10 PM 11/8/16.

 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
4. I've known that it was only a matter of time
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 03:25 PM
Jun 2017

Til we made the leap to questioning the vote totals in some of these states...

YCHDT

(962 posts)
5. They fucked with the voter rules just like they did in Florida in 2000 !!! That's something NO ONE
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 03:25 PM
Jun 2017

... is mentioning in their red herring "didn't change voting results" bullcrap

Baitball Blogger

(46,737 posts)
14. The fact that somebody took down DU suggests that they didn't want any quick
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 03:50 PM
Jun 2017

exchange of information between Democrats.

YCHDT

(962 posts)
122. THAT'S some scary shit ! Makes this all the more real, of course cut the left off from communicating
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 10:45 PM
Jun 2017

calimary

(81,322 posts)
118. Gee, funny, isn't it.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 10:13 PM
Jun 2017

I smell a rat.

Actually, let me rephrase that. I smell a BIGGER rat. I smell a whole football stadium full of bigger rats.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
129. YAS! There were motherfuckers here saying DU isn't big enough to bother with
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 01:41 AM
Jun 2017

They're drinking Moscow Mules right now.

IronLionZion

(45,460 posts)
148. It was organized and coordinated to happen on election day
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 07:29 AM
Jun 2017

And kept DU down for some time. They knew what they were doing. Probably not kids in their basement.

Maraya1969

(22,484 posts)
9. No just of the president but of some house and senate races too. And I want it put back to the way
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 03:32 PM
Jun 2017

it was supposed to be.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
10. Knocking voters off voter rolls is every
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 03:35 PM
Jun 2017

bit the same cheat as flipping Ds to Rs. Knocking out tens of thousands of votes for president when all of the down-ticket races were marked for Ds is criminal.

The hackers and anyone who aided them need to go to prison for a long time. Anyone considering messing with democracy needs to face the prospect of losing their freedom for years, and to be monitored afterwards to make certain there is no payoff.

SergeStorms

(19,204 posts)
136. Yep.....
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 02:12 AM
Jun 2017

between decades of gerrymandering to suit the GOP, voter suppression, and Russian interference, the outcome of MORE THAN ONE Presidential election has been manipulated.

How are we to even the playing field with these evil, democracy hating bullies called "Republicans"?

Do we stoop to their level? Do we get meaner, and more combative to counter their election abuse? Surely, we can't keep doing what we're doing, or the result will be unthinkable. It already is!

.99center

(1,237 posts)
82. It's just another massive conspiracy by the NSA and the deep state...
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:08 PM
Jun 2017

Lol, why would our ally engage in cyber warfare against us??? Maybe it's just some 400lb hacker tricking our intelligence agencies

Baitball Blogger

(46,737 posts)
13. Fuck yes, they did.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 03:48 PM
Jun 2017

We haven't felt confident about our stupid election boxes or our system of voting since the 2000 election exposed the weaknesses. No surprise that the Russians stepped in to exploit a system that the Republicans were already tampering with.

suston96

(4,175 posts)
15. May I ask......?
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 03:51 PM
Jun 2017

I believe it's true that the election results were changed in key areas.

What is the remedy for this kind of election fraud?

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
16. Russians din't need to fix the vote counts, Republicans had that covered already.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 03:53 PM
Jun 2017

Republicans just needed a mega-dose of manipulation and propaganda to get Trump close enough to get away with it. Not everyone is willing to stand idlely by and watch it happen though:

Reality Winner versus Reality Loser. Trump's Lies Revealed by Leak.

Nothing to see here, move along.

diva77

(7,643 posts)
75. THIS +100,000,000...and who can forget Walden O'Dell's famous line from 2003 fundraiser
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:52 PM
Jun 2017
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2004/03/diebolds-political-machine/

Diebold’s Political Machine
Political insiders suggest Ohio could become as decisive this year as Florida was four years ago. Which is why the state's plan to use paperless touch-screen voting machines has so many up in arms.

Bob Fitrakis and Harvey WassermanMar. 5, 2004 8:00 AM

snip...In recent years, central Ohio has been transformed from a bastion of Republicanism into a Democratic stronghold. Six of Columbus’ seven city council members are Democrats, as is the city’s mayor, Michael Coleman. But no Democrat has been elected to Congress from central Ohio in more than 20 years, and the area around Columbus still includes pockets where no Democrat stands a chance. One such Republican pocket is Upper Arlington, the Columbus suburb that is home to Walden “Wally” O’Dell, the chairman of the board and chief executive of Diebold. For years, O’Dell has given generously to Republican candidates. Last September, he held a packed $1,000-per-head GOP fundraiser at his 10,800-square-foot mansion. He has been feted as a guest at President Bush’s Texas ranch, joining a cadre of “Pioneers and Rangers” who have pledged to raise more than $100,000 for the Bush reelection campaign. Most memorably, O’Dell last fall penned a letter pledging his commitment “to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the President.” ...snip

What I believe: the fix was in long before Comey ever said anything about Hillary's emails -- but the timing of Comey's announcement was one of the usual Rethug stunts to help cloak the fact that the fix was in...

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
97. OH 2004 was 70% punch card. That was the problem.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 07:33 PM
Jun 2017

It was the punch card areas where votes were switched. In touch screen areas the % Dem vote increased over 2000, as expected. A lot of Republican areas got the new machines because they deleted fewer votes than punch cards, and statistically Dems did better than before in those areas, so no red flag there. Ohio punch card voting was designed to steal votes:

How Kerry Votes Were Switched To Bush Votes

diva77

(7,643 posts)
104. Interesting - did not know that. Thanks for info.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 07:48 PM
Jun 2017

At the end of the article it says there are authorities still pursuing the matter -- is there an ongoing investigation at this point?

get the red out

(13,466 posts)
19. I agree with you
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 03:55 PM
Jun 2017

And no, I don't believe anything would come of it if it were proven. People in power, I believe, tend to think it is best if us plebeians keep on believing it "can't happen here".

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
24. And they forgot the 2006, 2008 and 2012 elections?
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:10 PM
Jun 2017

Those polls you cite all dropped after the October Comey announcement. The national polls were as accurate as 2012. Did Obama steal that election? It's embarrassing that people continue to post utterly unsubstantiated nonsense because it fits their worldview.

Wisconsin counties that hand recounted didn't substantially differ from counties that did machine recounts. The differences were incorrectly filled out ballots.

Additionally if you had been reading the analysis of 538, they were saying that the election was closer than anybody thought. The media didn't delve deeply enough into the stats and history.

Saying don't ask me how the votes were hacked is a cop out. You're making an exceptional claim. It's incumbent upon you to provide supporting evidence of more than aspersions based on incorrect history and a poor understanding of statistics.

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
42. No, They Didn't Forget
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:34 PM
Jun 2017

Thanks to 8 Yrs of Shrub, the 2008 election was not ever going to be close enough to steal. Obama won in a landslide.

Me thinks that they did try to steal 2012, but something got in their way. KKK Rove went on TV, screaming that the #'s were changing....that it was too close to call. Go back and watch his little demonstration. He knew something was supposed to happen, but it never did.

Who knows how many other races were impacted. A couple of Senate seats was enough to make a huge difference in 2012 & 2016. Not to mention, they did not want it to be so obvious, which is why they probably manipulate down ballot as well.

I certainly am critical of the campaign run by Clinton, but I find it as hard to believe that if she knew these states were so close that Drumpf had a chance, she would have made an effort to spend much more time there. Instead, towards the end it seemed she was even starting to focus on some over the top states, because the others were comfortably locked up.

So I guess either you believe Clinton did not have a clue what she was doing, and so blew off states like WI or PA, or those states were stolen from under her on election night.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
62. I love Hillary, but the DNC was dysfunctional. Both her
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:04 PM
Jun 2017

Own campaign, and the DNC pretty much blew off Wi, part of Pa, and Michigan... Robbie Mook and Jennifer P were the ones who supposedly made the decision not to stir the waters. They didn't want to stir it up. Hillary was not happy about it. Micheal Moore and others said we were going to lose it. Many people called for help, and were frustrated. That doesn't mean that it wasn't tampered w or hacked.

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
142. This again? If the election was stolen...the DNC is not at fault.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 04:31 AM
Jun 2017

In fact let me say if the election was not stolen, the DNC is not at fault. Try going after the GOP...the DNC is just fine. Let 16 go...now if the GOP stole the election, and I have always thought they might have...then it makes even less sense to attack Democrats and beginning posts with a 'I love Hillary but' doesn't change that. Let me say for the record...you will not get voters to turn out for a party that is relentlessly attacked by the right and the left. So unless one wants to create a permanent GOP majority...it needs to stop.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
179. Distinguish between the many differt factors. It isn't one
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 02:16 PM
Jun 2017

Thing. We need to go into at least every closely contested state vigorishly in the future, as well as try to keep the election from being stolen, which was NOT the DNCs fault. Walk and chew gum.
No one is focused on attacking Dems, but you keep bringing that up. In fact, that is one of the things we need to change, protecting our candidate better. She was slaughtered with exaggeration and lies by the meda and the Repubs

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
201. Hillary campaigned furiously in Pennsylvania and her ads were everywhere.
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 03:57 PM
Jun 2017

She was campaigning hard in Wisconsin and Michigan until Trump pulled his ads out of those states because he figured they were lost.

njhoneybadger

(3,910 posts)
68. Didn't Michael Moore warn us about rust belt voters going for trump and
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:20 PM
Jun 2017

Hillary didn't take the warning seriously.
Or was that the perfect setup to manipulate the results and blame it on Hillary not campaigning in those states.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
181. Yes! It doesn't mean they didn't cheat, they did. The DNC
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 02:21 PM
Jun 2017

didn't cover all bases either though. In the future, we need to change this. However, given the ongoing state elections, there isn't much change.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
180. Absolutely. He went on every show possible, even an options
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 02:18 PM
Jun 2017

show, and pointed it out to the DNC. That is trying to change the outcome, rather than putting blinders on.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
198. Hillary campaigned furiously in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Both candidates scaled back their
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 02:33 PM
Jun 2017

campaign efforts in Wisconsin and Michigan because of HRC's big lead.

True Blue American

(17,986 posts)
177. 2016
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 01:48 PM
Jun 2017

Election was going along just fine until all of a sudden states started flipping to Trump. Just enough for him to win the electoral vote by 77,000.

Yet Hillary won the vote by close to 3 million. Something rotten in the US.

kerry-is-my-prez

(8,133 posts)
38. Yep - and still nothing has been done to fix it. We've had 3 people screwed out of the presidency
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:29 PM
Jun 2017

Gore, Kerry and Hillary Clinton. And it will probably still go on and on and get worse and worse while the Repubs gather more and more power. - now with the Russians help.

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
43. It's Merely Coincidence That Voting Machine Companies Are Owned By Repubs
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:35 PM
Jun 2017

Nothing to see there. Just a quirky coincidence.

benld74

(9,904 posts)
114. Need to say it with zest,,,
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 09:04 PM
Jun 2017


Eeez marily koinkidence dat vote mackine owned by comrad. No R3pUblikans! Da!

Tatiana

(14,167 posts)
31. I definitely think Michigan was stolen.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:19 PM
Jun 2017

I don't know about anything else. I have always suspected that somehow they stopped the recount because it would have proved Hillary received more votes.

MichMary

(1,714 posts)
56. Every single voting machine in Michigan
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:52 PM
Jun 2017

is optical scan. With paper back up. The recount they did verified the election totals. Whatever you think, Michigan was not stolen. And if Michigan wasn't stolen, it pretty much indicates that other traditionally blue states (like Wisconsin) also weren't.

This wasn't so much a "throw the bums out" election as it was a "burn the whole damn thing down" election.

Tatiana

(14,167 posts)
60. Only 40% of Michigan's precincts were re-tallied. There wasn't a full hand-counted recount.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:01 PM
Jun 2017

Why did a third of Detroit's voting machines register more ballots than actual voters?

There is something that doesn't pass the smell test. In Wayne County alone, 600 uncounted-for votes was actually narrowed to to 216. In such a close election, a statewide recount should have been allowed to proceed.

I do understand that Michigan is optical scan (as is Illinois).

MichMary

(1,714 posts)
65. Based on these figures
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:10 PM
Jun 2017

it actually could be made to sound like Dem cheating. More ballots than voters in heavily Democratic Detroit? Think those were R ballots?

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
33. Quote
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:21 PM
Jun 2017

"The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater."

Frank Zappa

BeyondGeography

(39,375 posts)
34. No, I don't
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:22 PM
Jun 2017

Are Hillary and Obama in on this, too? I mean if you and all the people in this embarrassing thread realize it, why haven't they spoken up?

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
45. Yes & Yes
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:40 PM
Jun 2017

First of all, Obama had no basis to say anything, he was not running.

And if Hillary knew, what proof would she have? The powers that be, and the media would help, would have destroyed her if she had made any such claims immediately after the election. Back then, the Russia story had not even begun to really take off.

The idea of an election being Stolen is RIDICULOUS! Why would they do something so criminal and change the direction of the country? Perish the thought. Repubs would NEVER EVER consider something so illegal or unethical.

<sarcasm off>

BeyondGeography

(39,375 posts)
47. Here's where we're at
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:43 PM
Jun 2017

and it's a very looooong way from the certainty that you express in the OP:

"The intelligence assessment acknowledges that there is still a great deal of uncertainty over how successful the Russian operatives were and does not reach a conclusion about whether it affected the outcome of the election, in which Donald Trump’s victory over Hillary Clinton hinged on three closely contested states."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jun/05/russia-us-election-hack-voting-system-nsa-report

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
41. The NSA report made it clear in several places that this was POSSIBLE.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:32 PM
Jun 2017

We're stupid if we don't investigate this further.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
93. I wouldn't go that far
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:38 PM
Jun 2017

The conspiracy was confirmed as real, it's the success of the conspiracy that's in question. Lots of people jumping to conclusions, but it's not like it isn't a possibility. Right now we don't know one way or another.

Mme. Defarge

(8,034 posts)
37. This is why believe that States
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:28 PM
Jun 2017

should be allowed to sue other States for failure to insure and demonstrate the integrity of their election methods.

crud

(619 posts)
86. This is brilliant!
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:20 PM
Jun 2017

Can states sue other states? I would say they have grounds and can show harm. And there is also equal protection that was opened up in the gore v bush decision...

ElementaryPenguin

(7,800 posts)
40. Yep. EXIT POLLS DON'T LIE! Do you think Putin was content to run a respectable 2nd place?
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:31 PM
Jun 2017

Election systems are not very hard to hack - WHY ON EARTH WOULDN'T PUTIN DO IT??? Of course they did!

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
48. repub Spin - You Can't Rely On Exit Polls
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:45 PM
Jun 2017

Because even though they used to be 100% accurate, that changed circa 2000.

But it has nothing to do with the electronic voting machines. Nothing at all. Just a coincidence.

Perhaps if they steal enough elections, they can use the recent history of exit polling as PROOF that they're wrong. You see, if you make something wrong time and again, people discount it.

If you're not cheating, you're not trying. And cheating does little good, unless you end up victorious.

Quixote1818

(28,947 posts)
46. I would give it better than a 50/50 chance based on the low probability Trump was supposed to
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:40 PM
Jun 2017

take those states and the fact that he took all of them, not just one or two. It looks fishy as hell.
 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
52. EXACTLY!
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:48 PM
Jun 2017

Clinton was ahead in so many key states, everyone was saying that Drumpf had to basically pull a Royal Flush in order to get to the magic #.

Clinton did not just barely win the National Vote. She won it handily. Damn right it was fishy.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
50. More and more info emerges - so maybe there will be actual proof of it.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:46 PM
Jun 2017

And boy, then Russia will really suffer our wrath!

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
54. Russia Will Suffer Our Wrath?
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:49 PM
Jun 2017

I'll believe that when I see it. Right now, they're in the oval office.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
55. Oh yes - our election was repeatedly, blatantly cyber-attacked by a dangerous adversary.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:52 PM
Jun 2017

But - Sanctions!!

Eliot Rosewater

(31,112 posts)
57. Well, I said it the MORNING after the election, that simply there are WAY more of us
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:52 PM
Jun 2017

than them and they absolutely did NOT get more votes in those 4 states.

Of that I am certain.

When it will be proven, dont know. Doubt any of us will still be alive.

ElementaryPenguin

(7,800 posts)
59. I'll never forget the stunned looks on the faces of most of the election experts that night...
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:54 PM
Jun 2017

They KNEW some big bullshit was going down - and that these results were not credible. Michael Murphy - GOP strategist on MSNBC - he looked like he was going to faint - and said something like "this goes against all the facts...all I know about the business..." An MSNBC reported said he was in Trump Tower, and some campaign workers there looked more stunned than anyone... (Except, of course, for Flynn, Kushner...Trump himself and all the others that knew exactly what was happening - probably evil Bannon too.)

ElementaryPenguin

(7,800 posts)
61. Part of the collusion was Trump campaign telling Russians which counties to hack in swing states
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:03 PM
Jun 2017

That would be their value. Wait and see if this doesn't prove to be the case!!

Amaryllis

(9,524 posts)
66. Absolutey it was eerily similart to 2004. They call it a red shift. You're sittng there watching and
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:14 PM
Jun 2017

seeing it shift against what the polls were saying...I said to my friends as we were watching, "I've seen this before. Same thing that happened in 2004."

But I was not at all sure Hillary would win and had been saying for a number of months that I was really worried with all the hacking going on that they were going to steal the election again. If they could hack into the DNC, would they stop with that? And Even MSM was reporting on Russian hacks of voter reg databases in nearly half the states and I never believed it when they said it didn't affect the vote count. Come on. Does anyone really think if they had the capability to hack voter databases, they would stop with that?

Then there was Interstate Crosscheck....

Mr.Bill

(24,303 posts)
69. Interesting, isn't it?
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:21 PM
Jun 2017

That Russia realizes the way to destroy our country is to get republicans elected.

Actually, the whole world knows this. Except the republicans and those who vote for them, of course.

Eyeball_Kid

(7,432 posts)
72. Solution: paper ballots, hand counts. Done.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:35 PM
Jun 2017

But... there's still too much money to be made by using hackable machines. "The Marketplace" can only make this problem worse. It's got to be government controlled, accountable through documentation, hand counted, paper ballots. It can be done.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
73. Need Some Kind Of Evidence
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:36 PM
Jun 2017

Michigan would be the best shot where in Wayne County (Detroit) where 70,000 ballots were blank for President. Nobody compared that to the last election to see how reasonable it seemed nor did they even look at any of the ballots that rejected as blank. We know that count is wildly high so did they flip votes to blank? That would be easier to accomplish.

 

Dream Girl

(5,111 posts)
76. Yep, they couldn't have flipped them to Trump, that would have been to hard to
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:52 PM
Jun 2017

Pass the sniff test. But they could have flipped them to blank and claimed that the voters weren't willing to vote for either candidate. More believable.

MichMan

(11,939 posts)
85. There were not 70K in Wayne county
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:19 PM
Jun 2017

There were not 70K undervotes in Wayne County. That total was state wide and many were write in votes for Bernie. Write ins are only counted in Michigan if a candidate pre registers as a write in and he did not. Totals below from Wayne County website

Wayne County (contains Detroit and surrounding suburbs)

Total # of ballots cast by voters on election day = 593,865

Votes

Clinton = 390,766
Trump = 159,502
Johnson = 14,501
Stein = 6740
Castle = 1271
Soltysik = 350
Write In = 4091 ( Note; Write Ins for Bernie counted as "no votes" since he was not registered as a write in candidate)

Total = 577,221

Total of under votes = 16,644 (No idea how many of these were write ins for Bernie )

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
131. I'm Seeing Very Different Results
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 01:48 AM
Jun 2017

When I look at the official web site for Wayne County. It shows
Clinton 519,444
Trump 228,993
Write-in 5,542
etc.
http://www.waynecounty.com/clerk/1609.htm

2008 Election
Obama 660,085
McCain 219,582
Write-in 1,422
Under votes 3,233


MichMan

(11,939 posts)
194. I didnt list the absentee, just those from election day
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 10:35 AM
Jun 2017

Either way, there was no where near the 70K you claimed

Your totals also do not include Johnson or Stein and the other fringe candidates.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
204. What My Totals Were Showing
Sat Jun 10, 2017, 01:22 PM
Jun 2017

Is that it was mathematically possible for there to be 70,000 undervotes in Wayne County. Fringe candidate totals would have only added clutter.

Here is a cut-and-paste listing "Detroit" undervotes. Nationwide there were over 1.75 million undervotes and that was more than double the total for 2012. Now if they were concentrated in minority communities like they were in Michigan - draw your own conclusion.

"GREG PALAST: Well, you know, people are looking for Russians, but what we had is a real Jim Crow election. Trump, for example, in Michigan, won by less than 11,000 votes. It looks like we had about 55,000 voters, mostly minorities, removed by this racist system called Crosscheck. In addition, you had a stoppage—even before the courts ordered the complete stop of the vote in Michigan, you had the Republican state officials completely sabotage the recount. They said, in Detroit, where there were 75,335 supposedly blank ballots for president—75,000—they said you can’t count 59 percent of the precincts, where most of the votes were missing. There were 87 machines in Detroit that were—that didn’t function. They were supposed to count about a thousand ballots each."

MichMan

(11,939 posts)
205. "Mathematically Possible" does not equal Really Happened lol
Mon Jun 12, 2017, 11:09 PM
Jun 2017

It was "mathematically possible" for me to win the Powerball and join the 1% . Except I didn't

Tatiana

(14,167 posts)
123. I agree with you. Michigan (especially Detroit) has always been suspicious to me.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 10:47 PM
Jun 2017

I suspect (no evidence) that either some Hillary votes were counted as "blanks" or were flipped to Jill Stein in the tabulation.

If we got a full re-count of all the paper ballots, I believe with all my heart Hillary would be proved the winner of Michigan.

MichMan

(11,939 posts)
195. Got it, no evidence to support any of your suspicions
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 10:41 AM
Jun 2017

I suspect that a lot of those undervotes were write ins for Bernie. If those people had voted for Hillary, she would have won I believe.

We will never know because a candidate needs to register as a write in for them to be counted and he did not.

Quanta

(195 posts)
74. It is your final paragraph that gives me pause.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:37 PM
Jun 2017

Why are the Democratic leaders and pundits SO afraid to call it what it is? Fear of the country becoming divided? We're already there. Fear of being cast as a nutjob? Hey...if you have a D after your name, work in the media, or speak out too often and loudly, it's already happened. Fear of retalition? We need heroes in this day and age.
Such weird times we live in...

 

trentwestcott

(83 posts)
78. So they did it in 2004 and 2016, but not in 2008 and 2012? Why?
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:58 PM
Jun 2017

I want to believe you're right, that this last election doesn't really reflect the country and the world I live in, but if there is a conservative cabal capable of stealing the election, why on earth would they allow Barack Obama not just one but two highly productive terms in office? For the sake of deniability maybe?

JCMach1

(27,559 posts)
87. If it's a good hack you won't find evidence
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:21 PM
Jun 2017

Meanwhile, even if this happened Obama and others would have to bury it because it would be seen to undermine the system.

Instead, focus on the Russian influence and not the worst of what they did... I.e. actual hacking of votes.

Removes tinfoil hat.

milestogo

(16,829 posts)
92. I'm from Wisconsin and I knew something happened on election night.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:38 PM
Jun 2017

Feingold was up by 1 point and finished down by 3 points. When he conceded he said "Its going to be a while before we understand what happened tonight". That's pretty ambiguous and it could be the shock of Trump winning and the generally bad night for Democrats.

Remember, Feingold was in the Senate for 18 years. He has a statistician who knows "where the votes are" in all of Wisconsin. Nevertheless if they saw something inexplicable on election night I wouldn't expect him to come out and say it. But I'm pretty sure they saw voting patterns that didn't make a lot of sense.

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
94. Yes 1000 times yes!
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:39 PM
Jun 2017

I think they flipped the whole goddamn thing. Something fishy went down on November 8, 2016.

procon

(15,805 posts)
96. As the old saying goes: In for a penny; in for a pound.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:57 PM
Jun 2017

If Russia went to all trouble to hack the DNC and steal emails to be used day by to whittle away at Clinton edge that would give Trump a boost, why would they stop there? Would they leave victory to change, trusting that idiot Trump to haul his own fat ass over the finish line?

The only way the Russians were going to get what they wanted was to ensure that Trump got elected. The only sure was to do that, of course, was to make damned sure that he had the higher vote count, and there's only one way they could have pulled that off.

gtar100

(4,192 posts)
100. Who are the holdouts? Who is suppressing the obvious?
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 07:40 PM
Jun 2017

It's like we've got to convince a bunch of assholes against their own selfish interests before the MSM will take it seriously.

Clinton *DID* win. By all accounts she should take over as president. But I know that all the repugs would scream bloody murder if she did. As if their cheating and acts of treason allows them to keep what they've stolen. We would be compromising if we go along with a do-over. Always a double standard with conservatives. They're ideology is rotten to the core and we've got a media that normalizes it.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
102. The lesson learned from 2004 was to keep one's powder dry and to let
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 07:43 PM
Jun 2017

the evidence emerge on its own timetable.

I am convinced the hesitancy we see in, say, Pelosi jumping on tRump is because she has seen the evidence, realizes he is toast and has decided to not get ahead of the evidence coming out. The same thing is probably happening when it comes to the vote fraud.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
108. Democrats in Congress probably know that votes were flippeed and probably thought
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 08:19 PM
Jun 2017

"well we lived through George W and we can live through Trump" Let's face it Many Democrats in Congress give us a hell of a lot of lip service but when it comes right down to it many Democrats are eating from the Same Corporate Trough as Republicans"

RicROC

(1,204 posts)
112. The 2016 Coup
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 08:37 PM
Jun 2017

The elephant in the room is finally being seen! The US experienced a coup in the 2016 Presidential election and it will take brave patriots to proclaim the truth.

blueinredohio

(6,797 posts)
113. That's what I have said all along
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 08:39 PM
Jun 2017

they got far enough to change the votes, when all this is over every state should have to go through the votes to make sure it's all on the up and up

joanbarnes

(1,722 posts)
116. YES. I HAVE BEEN SAYING THIS ALL ALONG SINCE NOVEMBER.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 09:59 PM
Jun 2017

Down ballot too, look at Missouri exit polls, off by 10%! Claire McCaskill is NOW looking at it, since her job will be next. How did they do it? Didn't REPUKES show them how in 2000 and 2004?

dflprincess

(28,079 posts)
117. Yes and it will probably be one of those things that gets buried
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 10:07 PM
Jun 2017

"for the good of the country". Just like in 2000 and 2004 (and if Anonymous hadn't intervened, it would have happened in 2012).

The only thing that might make it different this time is that it was interference by a foreign entity, not just the normal Republican cheating. Perhaps this time the Democrats won't just roll over and let it go.



southerncrone

(5,506 posts)
124. I personally believe this has been going on for quite a while. We had to have the "hanging chads"
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 11:47 PM
Jun 2017

to sell electronic voting machines, which can be programmed to incrementally increase votes or decrease votes w/ an algorithm. I read back in the early 2000s that they could also be altered using a laser on a certain port. Can't remember where I read this, been too long ago. IMHO, our first order of business should be getting rid of these machines & go back to paper ballots that can be physically counted. They don't need the Russians, they have these machines they can manipulate. If you take a look at the Republican takeover of this country, it has happened dramatically since the inception of these electronic voting machines.

This is a coup, make no mistake about it.

blue-wave

(4,356 posts)
125. They cannot win
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 12:49 AM
Jun 2017

fairly. So they steal. They did it to Gore(Florida), Kerry(Ohio) and Hillary(what do you think the Russian thing is?). If we, as democrats, do not unite to fight and stop this type of coup, we might as well give up. It must be stopped!

We can stop this crap, it just takes money and the right kind of tough fighting spirit. Sadly, I don't see that in the democratic party of today. We need a full time department within the DNC to organize an offense that will stop the stealing before ANY election.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
140. Project Alamo.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 02:58 AM
Jun 2017

That's the name of Trump's "digital operation" which supposedly delivered the election to him by "suppressing" Hillary votes, wink wink nudge nudge. Turns out it's headquartered in San Antonio, oops. Anyway read all about it:

"Trump’s presidential election victory is the most successful digital voter suppression operation in American history. The secret weapons in Trump’s digital arsenal were Project Alamo, his database of 220 million people in the United States, and the Facebook Advertising Platform. By leveraging Facebook’s sophisticated advertising tools, including Facebook Dark Posts, Facebook Audience-Targeting, and Facebook Custom Audiences from Customer Lists, the Trump campaign was able to secretly target Hillary Clinton’s supporters and covertly discourage them from going to the polls to vote."

I think they did a little more than discourage but anyway that's the official description.

https://medium.com/startup-grind/how-the-trump-campaign-built-an-identity-database-and-used-facebook-ads-to-win-the-election-4ff7d24269ac


TDale313

(7,820 posts)
127. The thing is I can't with any confidence say it didn't happen.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 01:10 AM
Jun 2017

And seriously, in a democracy if people can't trust in the electoral system you really have nothing. We deserve verifiable elections and voting systems. Because even if there wasn't election fraud the mere fact that it's feasible- that there's a lack of confidence aids those who want to suppress the vote. And the answer isn't to pretend there's not a problem or refuse to address it. The answer's to fight like hell to fix what is clearly a broken system.

Dan

(3,570 posts)
128. There is another problem
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 01:32 AM
Jun 2017

The software from that company - is no longer any good. If they have the source code - they own it...;

My opinion

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
132. Connection Between Voting Machines & Registrations?
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 01:59 AM
Jun 2017

I recall seeing that there was a software being used for GOTV or some such role, but that it also somehow related to the voting machines themselves.

Now, I come across this article from several hours ago, and am curious if there is something to this.

[http://www.wctv.tv/content/news/Leaked-NSA-document-Tallahassee-based-voter-registration-software-hacked-by-Russians-426832921.html|

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
134. Come To Think Of It, They Were ALL Over Those Computer Systems Prior To Election Day
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 02:04 AM
Jun 2017

So of course, we're expected to believe that they infiltrated Multitudes of computers and software, but 100% did not touch the Tabulators or Election Night results.

Yet they expect us to vote, and want us to believe it matters. They suck us into their little game with YEARS of campaigning, and loads of money spent and donated, some by folks who can't afford it. And then they do whatever the hell they want.

And you can damn well bet, if it happened, OUR SIDE IS COMPLICIT. Go along to get along, eh?

mvd

(65,174 posts)
139. I'd like to ask a statistician about the probability of..
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 02:27 AM
Jun 2017

winning the popular vote by around 3 million but also losing the electoral vote comfortably. And the states that gave the electoral vote margin were traditionally blue states. I would bet the chance given would be extremely low. Combined with all the Russia interference and allegations of hacking, something just doesn't seem right.

TomVilmer

(1,832 posts)
141. Sorry, but statistics are not helping here...
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 04:31 AM
Jun 2017

"Without a recount, all we can do for now is look for any meaningful difference ... we checked the six other states with a margin between Clinton and Trump of less than 10 percentage points that use a mix of paper and machine voting: Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas and Virginia. For each county in those states, we looked at Clinton’s vote share and whether it was associated with the type of voting system the county used ...
We found no apparent correlation between voting method and outcome in six of the eight states, and a thin possible link between voting method and results in Wisconsin and Texas. However, the two states showed opposite results...
"
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/demographics-not-hacking-explain-the-election-results/

"National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey: Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states."
http://www.theamericanmirror.com/fbi-nsa-no-evidence-russia-manipulated-us-vote-tallying/

mvd

(65,174 posts)
159. I don't believe Comey and Rogers at all
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 09:54 AM
Jun 2017

You didn't address the kind of statistics I wonder about. Also your first point needs trust in the voting process, which I do not have.

TomVilmer

(1,832 posts)
164. I do not believe them either...
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 11:06 AM
Jun 2017

... but I cannot see any good reason why all your official people should join together in such a big lie. Except they did about WMDs in Iraq, but that was more wishful thinking than lying,

And since you neither has any trust in the voting process, nothing I could give you would help - and then we can only talk about feelings. I actually believe in the US voting process, but not in any other part of your corrupt two party system. For me the cheating is on all other levels, since I (and Nate Silver) cannot trace it in the actual numbers of votes. You can easily google a statistician who will tell you what you want to hear. That is why I checked these numbers myself.

mvd

(65,174 posts)
165. Right now it is just a feeling..
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 11:24 AM
Jun 2017

..but one I think is less far fetched than it used to be. I just think a ton is yet to come out about Trump.

quaker bill

(8,224 posts)
145. This much I know
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 06:21 AM
Jun 2017

No statewide candidate in my experience has won the Florida county where I live by as much as Hillary did, and then went on to lose the state. Generally dem candidates that have lost only won my county by 2000 votes or so. Barack won in 2012 statewide with a margin here of 35,000. Hillary won here with a margin of more than 125,000 but still lost the state. I do not know about hacking, but something has smelled fishy here.

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
149. We know there was media manipulation, for sure
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 07:57 AM
Jun 2017

We know social media manipulation happened at the hands of GOP and Parscale.

We know broadcast media manipulation happened with the hacking and email releases.

We also know voter data from the DCCC was hacked and leaked to at least some GOP.

We don't yet have any evidence of voter manipulation. Could be, but I'm withholding judgement until evidence arises. Until then, the media problem isn't​ going away and I am focusing on that for now.

DFW

(54,410 posts)
155. A family member of mine does hi-tech stuff for DARPA
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 09:20 AM
Jun 2017

In 2002--FIFTEEN YEARS AGO--when the electronic voting machines were first instituted (and the Republicans started scoring "surprise upset victories" as soon as they were used, e.g. Max Cleland's defeat in the Georgia Senate) my brother told me, "give me a laptop and a cell phone, and I'll make any of those voting machines give you any result you desire." You can imagine how sophisticated they must have gotten at it in the meantime.

IN 2004, Diebold went to court to sue, successfully, to have their voting machines declared "private property," and could only be forensically examined with permission from the owners--something they never granted. In the deciding state of Ohio in 2004, where the Ohio Secretary of State was also the Bush campaign chairman, the head of Diebold said he would "deliver Ohio for Bush," something he apparently accomplished. In Ohio, ONE--count 'em, ONE--of the electronic voting machines was forensically examined before its owners could come to cart it off. It was in an out-of-the-way precinct with just 600 registered voters. The voting machine gave Bush 3000 votes in the precinct with 600 registered voters. The Republicans called it a "glitch," deducted 2400 votes from Bush's "margin of victory" in Ohio, and STILL refused to let ANY of the other machines' hard drives to be subjected to forensic examination.

If there's anyone left out there who DOESN'T get what these machines are about, then I can't help you. If the results are overwhelming in one direction (e.g. Obama in 2008 and 2012) they either can't or won't get so blatant as to tip their hand, but if they can get away with stealing an election, I'd say there is strong evidence they will, and not give it a second thought.

Top Republican strategists are not total morons. They know that in a fairly held election, they lose. Their morals are just a little loose on the subject of what they think is a legitimate way around that fact.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
183. NO TRUER WORDS: They know that in a fairly held election, they lose.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 04:04 PM
Jun 2017

That is just the way it is when you blanket yourself in a failed ideology and the members of your electorate are dwindling from natural attrition. The only way you can "win" elections is to cheat.

catbyte

(34,404 posts)
158. HRC lost MI by 13K votes. All they'd have to do is flip a few per precinct & nobody's the wiser.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 09:53 AM
Jun 2017

I'll never believe that that SCROTUS won Michigan fair & square.

PDittie

(8,322 posts)
161. I'm just glad we all seem to be back
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 10:40 AM
Jun 2017

to appreciating Glenn Greenwald (this week). Though is it time to hate on Wikileaks for something else?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/wikileaks-declares-war-on-the-intercept

These constantly-shifting alliances are really wearing me out.

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
166. The big question for me is: What happens if there was tampering??
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 11:58 AM
Jun 2017

As the evidence mounts, I keep wondering what happens if tampering was found, and there is evidence that the election was compromised (or worse outright stolen by software modification)?

Does Trump just get impeached, and Pence steps in? Hardly seems right given that he was brought in on the same ticket.

Does Trump and Pence lose their offices, and Ryan steps in?

If the damage can be positively identified, and the numbers indicate that Hillary actually won, is there a legal process by which Trump/Pence is out and she's in?

If Trump/Pence were never really validly elected, does Obama come back into office (since the inauguration is invalid), is he still technically the president, even though it is over the 2 term limit?

Is there a route to a special election?

brooklynite

(94,602 posts)
168. Here's a hint: read the Constitution
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 12:06 PM
Jun 2017

Nothing about voting being accurate (actually, there's no Constitutional Right to people voting); nothing about a "do-over".

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
170. Well thank you captain obvious.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 12:27 PM
Jun 2017

So, you tell me to read the constitution (with the so cute and condescending "hint&quot , then point out that the Constitution doesn't cover it. That's right, there's nothing in the constitution that covers this.. hence.. the question.

But, thanks for your time and snark.

brooklynite

(94,602 posts)
171. ANother OBVIOUS comment...
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 12:30 PM
Jun 2017

If the Constitution doesn't "cover it", it can't get added, absent a Constitutional Amendment.

The Constitution says that States select Electors; they did. The Constitution says that the Term of Office (absent Impeachment) is 4 years. It remains that way. No do overs.

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
172. So I guess laws and judicial precedent is nonexistent?
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 12:37 PM
Jun 2017

There's nothing at all in the constitution about the Supreme Court having the authority to decide an election in the event of ongoing ballot recounts.. but there's now precedent (even if they did throw in that ridiculous statement at the end of that decision).

There's nothing in the Constitution about libel or slander. In fact the first amendment would seem to specifically invalidate any such laws.. yet they are on the books, and legal through decided court precedent as well.

As far as I know, there is no precedent at all for something like this, and I'm wondering (preferably from someone who has a better understanding of the law than I do, what options there would be. You may very well be right that there is none at all, but unless you know of any law or judicial precedence, then my question is a valid one, and I don't appreciate the snark.

brooklynite

(94,602 posts)
173. I'm not being snarky; I'm being blunt
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 01:06 PM
Jun 2017

Ever since Election Day, people have been fulminating about changing the rules or the process; it simply doesn't work that way, and "they cheated" isn't an allowable reason to revisit the results. Bush v. Gore had Standing before the Court because of Federal Legislation in compliance with Article 2, Section 3 as to when Electors' ballots needed to be submitted for Congressional review. There is no Constitutional provision that says an Election has to be "fair" because there's no Constitutional right to you having a chance to vote. Your State chooses to allow you to; if you felt the Election outcome was tainted, you arguably could have gone to State Court to demand a revote before the scheduled date of the Electoral College vote, but beyond that, there's no legal basis for the entire National Election to be invalidated. Former Law Professor Barack Obama doesn't say it's possible; Former Law Professor Elizabeth Warren doesn't say it's possible. NOBODY does. The Election was fully compliant with all provisions of the Constitution. If you disagree, tell us what SPECIFIC Constitutional provision or right was violated.


(FWIW - I HAVE studied Constitutional Law; I'm not making things up.)

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
176. Thank you.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 01:40 PM
Jun 2017

My apology for reading snark into your comment.

Agree about the posts to change the rules, but please note that I didn't suggest anything. I'm just wondering what legal options there are out there, if any.

With all the thought and consideration that the founders put into the possibility of foreign intervention in our process (such as the natural born citizen clause to ensure foreign monarchs couldn't purchase their way into the presidency), it sure seems odd that there's no recourse at all.

Response to SoCalMusicLover (Original post)

athena

(4,187 posts)
189. No, the exit polls predicted a Hillary win.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 05:38 PM
Jun 2017

Unlike you, I don't just make claims without providing references. In Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Florida, exit polls predicted a Clinton win. If the exit polls were right, Hillary Clinton should be president today. See:

http://tdmsresearch.com/2016/11/10/2016-presidential-election-table/

Excerpt:
"Exit polls were conducted in 28 states. In 22 states the discrepancies between the exit polls and the vote count favored Trump. In 12 of these states the discrepancies favoring Trump exceeded the margin of error of the state’s exit poll."

I wonder why anyone would claim that the exit polls were "pretty much nuts on" when they were not even close.

athena

(4,187 posts)
191. You seem to be confusing "projection" with "exit poll".
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 11:28 PM
Jun 2017

The page you linked to only lists the results of the exit polls, breaking them down by gender, ethnicity, income, etc. It does not compare exit polls to actual vote totals.

I suspect that what you looked at was CNN's "projected winner" page. This is not based on exit polls alone. It's based on all the information that was available until the projection was made. The only way it would be wrong is if the projection had been wrong. A projection is not the same as an exit poll. Projections are made when actual results start coming in; it's only when exit polls show a landslide in a given state that a projection is made as soon as the polls close. Where the results are closer, they first compare exit poll results to the actual outcome to make a projection.

Here is the actual comparison of exit polls to election results, which shows that Hillary Clinton should have won:

Wisconsin: Exit poll: 48.2%-44.3% Clinton; Election result: 47.22%-46.45% Trump
Pennsylvania: Exit poll: 50.5%-46.1% Clinton; Election result: 48.17%-47.46% Trump
Florida: Exit poll: 47.7%-46.4% Clinton; Election result: 48.60%-47.41% Trump
North Carolina: Exit poll: 48.6%-46.5% Clinton; Election result: 49.83%-46.17% Trump

If you still don't believe me, here are four web sites making the point that the exit polls predicted a Clinton win:

http://www.alternet.org/something-stinks-when-exit-polls-and-official-counts-dont-match

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/09/how-wrong-were-the-polls-in-predicting-the-us-election/

http://obat-drug.info/news/2016-Exit-Polls-vs.-Actual-Results:-Trump-Lost-Election-After-All?-Here%E2%80%99s-What-May-Have-Happened

http://www.inquisitr.com/3742358/2016-electoral-map-results-comparing-exit-polls-with-elections-results-in-light-of-recount2016/
Excerpt:
"Additionally, what perplexes many voters is that the margins of the exit polls compared with the margins of the initial 2016 electoral map results are well beyond the margin of error. But it’s not just that. Many find it peculiar that this particular data trend only happened in four states, which were the four states that Donald Trump needed to win; Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania."

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
193. Ah interesting...here is what CNN said about Michigan...
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 08:41 AM
Jun 2017
http://edition.cnn.com/election/results/states/michigan
michigan results
all states
michigan

key
presidential results
presidentprojected winner
key race16 electoral votestrump
candidate%votes
trump 47.6% 2,279,543
clinton 47.4% 2,268,839
johnson 3.6% 172,136
stein 1.1% 51,463
full details
est. 100% inupdated 2:03 pm ET, Feb. 16
county results map

And Pennsylvania:

pennsylvania results
presidential results
presidentprojected winner
key race20 electoral votestrump
candidate%votes
trump 48.6% 2,970,733
clinton 47.9% 2,926,441
johnson 2.4% 146,715
stein 0.8% 49,941
full details
est. 100% inupdated 2:03 pm ET, Feb. 16

http://edition.cnn.com/election/results/states/pennsylvania

SO these are NOT really exit polls?, but "Projected winner" polls?

Thanks - did not get that nuance!

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
175. Could we cut back on the auto-pessimism?...I mean, why say
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 01:16 PM
Jun 2017

"Nothing will come of it" when no on e really knows that.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
196. There are no ballots to recount, because they never existed.
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 11:26 AM
Jun 2017

Electronic voting is and always has been bullshit, and might as weel have been designed to be hacked.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
197. And I believe Trump when he says how surprised he was on Election Night.
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 11:30 AM
Jun 2017

If the hacking was enough to flip the election, it was decided at a higher level than anyone who consults with Trump.

We only come back from this via paper ballots, hand-counted and published locally.

Butterflies

(1,240 posts)
203. I have never trusted the electronic voting machines
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 05:19 PM
Jun 2017

of course they get hacked. I knew on election night that votes were changed to get Trump in. It made me sick. The Republicans are fine with cheating as long as it is to their benefit.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You Do Realize They Proba...