General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYou Do Realize They Probably Changed The Election Results
All those states that Clinton was comfortably ahead, which is why everyone thought she was going to win in a landslide, were probably flipped through the Russian hacking.
Of course, nobody is saying this, because the last time electronic fraud was suggested back in 2004, they were labeled as crazy conspiracy weirdos.
Don't ask me how they did it, I know little about these things. It just makes sense, that if you really want to manipulate and WIN an election that you're destined to lose, one must be dedicated until the end. Why bother working so hard to hack for months and months, only to fall short when it counts?
I guess after living through 2004, I'm perhaps gullible to believing things like this. But I'm guessing that for those who did, 2016 was EERILY similar in how election night transpired. The only thing missing was karl rove coming on to yell that it was too early to believe Clinton was going to stay ahead.
The funny thing is, even if this were somehow proven down the line, nothing would come of it. You would think that in a Democracy, a fraudulent election would not be allowed to stand. But deep down I wonder if there is a belief the election was truly stolen, but nobody dare say anything.
monmouth4
(9,708 posts)Wish I had more of it.
BamaRefugee
(3,483 posts)while we wait, probably right up to the 2018 elections, the Russians are working non-stop to perfect their techniques even more, ensuring yet another election going their way.
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,123 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)The ruskies ARE and have been working on NEW techniques to help this administration STAY in power.
Also, what the IC said about russian meddling probably being bigger than what was imagined is NO shock to me (About a month before the election night Nov. 8th, I had begun reading Malcolm Nance's book: The Plot To Hack America-great book which told of this ruskie hacking BEFORE it happened. Chapter 9, especially chilling). I've always thought something was 'wrong' from the very start after Hillary's loss. Hillary had solid leads going by almost EVERY person I was following up TO election night in the 3 states (PA, WI, MI.) she ended up losing by about 70,000 votes combined, and we've since found out that hundreds of THOUSANDS of Dem votes were either crosschecked or purged off of Dem voting rolls--and who in hell knows what happens in Ohio (Post-2004) and Florida (Post-2000) with Dem votes.
Crosscheck Removed 450K Voters in MI, 270 K in AZ and 590 K in NC!!
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/11/14/1599330/-Crosscheck-Removed-450K-Voters-in-MI-270-K-in-AZ-and-590-K-in-NC
Under THIS rotten, crooked, ruskie-influenced, tRumputin DOJ, the GOP IS going to be voter-suppressing Dems off the CHAIN in 2018--and with ruskie "assistance" of course. How we overcome this, I have no earthly clue, because even IF Dems and Indy's turn up and turn out in massive numbers to vote, we know the GOP will just ramp up their voter-crosschecking, voter-purging (New anti-Dem voter ID laws in WI.) and whatever russia will be doing to help out this next time around to take away "enough" numbers so the thuglicans win in certain states AGAIN. This beauguard-lead DOJ won't lift a finger to see that Dems aren't voter-suppressed, even if there IS credible evidence given to them. At time, my stomach gets queasy just thinking about HOW we're going to be able to vote in a fair way in 2018 & 2020.
itcfish
(1,828 posts)receipts, they can not tamper with that. The results are not that quick but they are more tamper proof IMO
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)It would be admitting that Russia DID gain control of our election process, and it would cause the citizens to lose faith in our election system.
Some will know, and they will never say, except MAYBE on their death beds. But probably not.
Crash2Parties
(6,017 posts)We can make a $0.25 transaction (plus fees) at a checkout counter secure and able to pass an audit. But as a nation, we allow voting machines & tally systems that have been proven for a decade to be insecure. And I don't mean hackable; it should go without saying that they should be protected from outside hacks. I'm talking about systems that are trivial to manipulate at the machine level and then again at the county tally level with no audit trail, no record of anything other than the totals. And - go figure - the worst systems tend to be used in Red states, especially in the grossly redrawn Dem district(s).
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)We've had three general elections stolen from the Dems: Bush v Gore, Bush v Kerry, and now Trump v Clinton. All because of right wing nefarious circumstances.
delisen
(6,044 posts)Greybnk48
(10,168 posts)when the election results were blacked out for 4 hours and then, voila! Bush won! Wisconsin was like that this year for Trump AND Ron Johnson.
YCHDT
(962 posts)Greybnk48
(10,168 posts)The Supreme Court gave Bush the election.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)ElementaryPenguin
(7,800 posts)So we then put the electronic voting in EVERYWHERE!!!
IronLionZion
(45,460 posts)We should have gotten the Senate seat and the white house
SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)that a total of 80,000 combined votes in key districts was enough to swing Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Ohio. Mysteriously, all of those districts, and those states, turned red for Trump. Coincidence? I think not.
Marthe48
(16,975 posts)until stopping the updates on his site and disappearing around 10 PM 11/8/16.
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)Til we made the leap to questioning the vote totals in some of these states...
YCHDT
(962 posts)... is mentioning in their red herring "didn't change voting results" bullcrap
NRaleighLiberal
(60,015 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,737 posts)exchange of information between Democrats.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)byronius
(7,395 posts)musette_sf
(10,202 posts)jaysunb
(11,856 posts)FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)mopinko
(70,135 posts)YCHDT
(962 posts)YCHDT
(962 posts)calimary
(81,322 posts)I smell a rat.
Actually, let me rephrase that. I smell a BIGGER rat. I smell a whole football stadium full of bigger rats.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)They're drinking Moscow Mules right now.
Baitball Blogger
(46,737 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)Justice
(7,188 posts)IronLionZion
(45,460 posts)And kept DU down for some time. They knew what they were doing. Probably not kids in their basement.
Raster
(20,998 posts)There was method to their madness.
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,013 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)Maraya1969
(22,484 posts)it was supposed to be.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)bit the same cheat as flipping Ds to Rs. Knocking out tens of thousands of votes for president when all of the down-ticket races were marked for Ds is criminal.
The hackers and anyone who aided them need to go to prison for a long time. Anyone considering messing with democracy needs to face the prospect of losing their freedom for years, and to be monitored afterwards to make certain there is no payoff.
SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)between decades of gerrymandering to suit the GOP, voter suppression, and Russian interference, the outcome of MORE THAN ONE Presidential election has been manipulated.
How are we to even the playing field with these evil, democracy hating bullies called "Republicans"?
Do we stoop to their level? Do we get meaner, and more combative to counter their election abuse? Surely, we can't keep doing what we're doing, or the result will be unthinkable. It already is!
kag
(4,079 posts)Paper Ballots!
arthritisR_US
(7,288 posts)have paper ballots and be damned expediency!
m.summers
(6 posts)Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)mainer
(12,022 posts)hello, Vladimir.
IronLionZion
(45,460 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts).99center
(1,237 posts)Lol, why would our ally engage in cyber warfare against us??? Maybe it's just some 400lb hacker tricking our intelligence agencies
Maven
(10,533 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,737 posts)We haven't felt confident about our stupid election boxes or our system of voting since the 2000 election exposed the weaknesses. No surprise that the Russians stepped in to exploit a system that the Republicans were already tampering with.
suston96
(4,175 posts)I believe it's true that the election results were changed in key areas.
What is the remedy for this kind of election fraud?
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)Republicans just needed a mega-dose of manipulation and propaganda to get Trump close enough to get away with it. Not everyone is willing to stand idlely by and watch it happen though:
Reality Winner versus Reality Loser. Trump's Lies Revealed by Leak.
Nothing to see here, move along.
diva77
(7,643 posts)Diebolds Political Machine
Political insiders suggest Ohio could become as decisive this year as Florida was four years ago. Which is why the state's plan to use paperless touch-screen voting machines has so many up in arms.
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey WassermanMar. 5, 2004 8:00 AM
snip...In recent years, central Ohio has been transformed from a bastion of Republicanism into a Democratic stronghold. Six of Columbus seven city council members are Democrats, as is the citys mayor, Michael Coleman. But no Democrat has been elected to Congress from central Ohio in more than 20 years, and the area around Columbus still includes pockets where no Democrat stands a chance. One such Republican pocket is Upper Arlington, the Columbus suburb that is home to Walden Wally ODell, the chairman of the board and chief executive of Diebold. For years, ODell has given generously to Republican candidates. Last September, he held a packed $1,000-per-head GOP fundraiser at his 10,800-square-foot mansion. He has been feted as a guest at President Bushs Texas ranch, joining a cadre of Pioneers and Rangers who have pledged to raise more than $100,000 for the Bush reelection campaign. Most memorably, ODell last fall penned a letter pledging his commitment to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the President. ...snip
What I believe: the fix was in long before Comey ever said anything about Hillary's emails -- but the timing of Comey's announcement was one of the usual Rethug stunts to help cloak the fact that the fix was in...
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)It was the punch card areas where votes were switched. In touch screen areas the % Dem vote increased over 2000, as expected. A lot of Republican areas got the new machines because they deleted fewer votes than punch cards, and statistically Dems did better than before in those areas, so no red flag there. Ohio punch card voting was designed to steal votes:
How Kerry Votes Were Switched To Bush Votes
diva77
(7,643 posts)At the end of the article it says there are authorities still pursuing the matter -- is there an ongoing investigation at this point?
triron
(22,007 posts)we live in a democracy.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)get the red out
(13,466 posts)And no, I don't believe anything would come of it if it were proven. People in power, I believe, tend to think it is best if us plebeians keep on believing it "can't happen here".
librechik
(30,674 posts)I've seen this all happen before.
And no, nothing will be done. Sad.
mythology
(9,527 posts)Those polls you cite all dropped after the October Comey announcement. The national polls were as accurate as 2012. Did Obama steal that election? It's embarrassing that people continue to post utterly unsubstantiated nonsense because it fits their worldview.
Wisconsin counties that hand recounted didn't substantially differ from counties that did machine recounts. The differences were incorrectly filled out ballots.
Additionally if you had been reading the analysis of 538, they were saying that the election was closer than anybody thought. The media didn't delve deeply enough into the stats and history.
Saying don't ask me how the votes were hacked is a cop out. You're making an exceptional claim. It's incumbent upon you to provide supporting evidence of more than aspersions based on incorrect history and a poor understanding of statistics.
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)Thanks to 8 Yrs of Shrub, the 2008 election was not ever going to be close enough to steal. Obama won in a landslide.
Me thinks that they did try to steal 2012, but something got in their way. KKK Rove went on TV, screaming that the #'s were changing....that it was too close to call. Go back and watch his little demonstration. He knew something was supposed to happen, but it never did.
Who knows how many other races were impacted. A couple of Senate seats was enough to make a huge difference in 2012 & 2016. Not to mention, they did not want it to be so obvious, which is why they probably manipulate down ballot as well.
I certainly am critical of the campaign run by Clinton, but I find it as hard to believe that if she knew these states were so close that Drumpf had a chance, she would have made an effort to spend much more time there. Instead, towards the end it seemed she was even starting to focus on some over the top states, because the others were comfortably locked up.
So I guess either you believe Clinton did not have a clue what she was doing, and so blew off states like WI or PA, or those states were stolen from under her on election night.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)Own campaign, and the DNC pretty much blew off Wi, part of Pa, and Michigan... Robbie Mook and Jennifer P were the ones who supposedly made the decision not to stir the waters. They didn't want to stir it up. Hillary was not happy about it. Micheal Moore and others said we were going to lose it. Many people called for help, and were frustrated. That doesn't mean that it wasn't tampered w or hacked.
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)In fact let me say if the election was not stolen, the DNC is not at fault. Try going after the GOP...the DNC is just fine. Let 16 go...now if the GOP stole the election, and I have always thought they might have...then it makes even less sense to attack Democrats and beginning posts with a 'I love Hillary but' doesn't change that. Let me say for the record...you will not get voters to turn out for a party that is relentlessly attacked by the right and the left. So unless one wants to create a permanent GOP majority...it needs to stop.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)Thing. We need to go into at least every closely contested state vigorishly in the future, as well as try to keep the election from being stolen, which was NOT the DNCs fault. Walk and chew gum.
No one is focused on attacking Dems, but you keep bringing that up. In fact, that is one of the things we need to change, protecting our candidate better. She was slaughtered with exaggeration and lies by the meda and the Repubs
StevieM
(10,500 posts)She was campaigning hard in Wisconsin and Michigan until Trump pulled his ads out of those states because he figured they were lost.
njhoneybadger
(3,910 posts)Hillary didn't take the warning seriously.
Or was that the perfect setup to manipulate the results and blame it on Hillary not campaigning in those states.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)They didn't respond. We lost.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)didn't cover all bases either though. In the future, we need to change this. However, given the ongoing state elections, there isn't much change.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)show, and pointed it out to the DNC. That is trying to change the outcome, rather than putting blinders on.
QC
(26,371 posts)StevieM
(10,500 posts)campaign efforts in Wisconsin and Michigan because of HRC's big lead.
True Blue American
(17,986 posts)Election was going along just fine until all of a sudden states started flipping to Trump. Just enough for him to win the electoral vote by 77,000.
Yet Hillary won the vote by close to 3 million. Something rotten in the US.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)iluvtennis
(19,863 posts)benld74
(9,904 posts)kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)Gore, Kerry and Hillary Clinton. And it will probably still go on and on and get worse and worse while the Repubs gather more and more power. - now with the Russians help.
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)Nothing to see there. Just a quirky coincidence.
benld74
(9,904 posts)Eeez marily koinkidence dat vote mackine owned by comrad. No R3pUblikans! Da!
Tatiana
(14,167 posts)I don't know about anything else. I have always suspected that somehow they stopped the recount because it would have proved Hillary received more votes.
MichMary
(1,714 posts)is optical scan. With paper back up. The recount they did verified the election totals. Whatever you think, Michigan was not stolen. And if Michigan wasn't stolen, it pretty much indicates that other traditionally blue states (like Wisconsin) also weren't.
This wasn't so much a "throw the bums out" election as it was a "burn the whole damn thing down" election.
Tatiana
(14,167 posts)Why did a third of Detroit's voting machines register more ballots than actual voters?
There is something that doesn't pass the smell test. In Wayne County alone, 600 uncounted-for votes was actually narrowed to to 216. In such a close election, a statewide recount should have been allowed to proceed.
I do understand that Michigan is optical scan (as is Illinois).
MichMary
(1,714 posts)it actually could be made to sound like Dem cheating. More ballots than voters in heavily Democratic Detroit? Think those were R ballots?
MichMan
(11,939 posts)AntiFascist
(12,792 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)"The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater."
Frank Zappa
BeyondGeography
(39,375 posts)Are Hillary and Obama in on this, too? I mean if you and all the people in this embarrassing thread realize it, why haven't they spoken up?
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)First of all, Obama had no basis to say anything, he was not running.
And if Hillary knew, what proof would she have? The powers that be, and the media would help, would have destroyed her if she had made any such claims immediately after the election. Back then, the Russia story had not even begun to really take off.
The idea of an election being Stolen is RIDICULOUS! Why would they do something so criminal and change the direction of the country? Perish the thought. Repubs would NEVER EVER consider something so illegal or unethical.
<sarcasm off>
BeyondGeography
(39,375 posts)and it's a very looooong way from the certainty that you express in the OP:
"The intelligence assessment acknowledges that there is still a great deal of uncertainty over how successful the Russian operatives were and does not reach a conclusion about whether it affected the outcome of the election, in which Donald Trumps victory over Hillary Clinton hinged on three closely contested states."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jun/05/russia-us-election-hack-voting-system-nsa-report
brooklynite
(94,602 posts)I'd explain why, but it won't change your mind.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)We're stupid if we don't investigate this further.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)The conspiracy was confirmed as real, it's the success of the conspiracy that's in question. Lots of people jumping to conclusions, but it's not like it isn't a possibility. Right now we don't know one way or another.
Mme. Defarge
(8,034 posts)should be allowed to sue other States for failure to insure and demonstrate the integrity of their election methods.
crud
(619 posts)Can states sue other states? I would say they have grounds and can show harm. And there is also equal protection that was opened up in the gore v bush decision...
Mme. Defarge
(8,034 posts)been, in effect, disenfranchised?
ElementaryPenguin
(7,800 posts)Election systems are not very hard to hack - WHY ON EARTH WOULDN'T PUTIN DO IT??? Of course they did!
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)Because even though they used to be 100% accurate, that changed circa 2000.
But it has nothing to do with the electronic voting machines. Nothing at all. Just a coincidence.
Perhaps if they steal enough elections, they can use the recent history of exit polling as PROOF that they're wrong. You see, if you make something wrong time and again, people discount it.
If you're not cheating, you're not trying. And cheating does little good, unless you end up victorious.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,800 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Quixote1818
(28,947 posts)take those states and the fact that he took all of them, not just one or two. It looks fishy as hell.
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)Clinton was ahead in so many key states, everyone was saying that Drumpf had to basically pull a Royal Flush in order to get to the magic #.
Clinton did not just barely win the National Vote. She won it handily. Damn right it was fishy.
treestar
(82,383 posts)How did he get that lucky? He got every one. One surprise is different than six
jmg257
(11,996 posts)And boy, then Russia will really suffer our wrath!
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)I'll believe that when I see it. Right now, they're in the oval office.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)But - Sanctions!!
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)than them and they absolutely did NOT get more votes in those 4 states.
Of that I am certain.
When it will be proven, dont know. Doubt any of us will still be alive.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,800 posts)They KNEW some big bullshit was going down - and that these results were not credible. Michael Murphy - GOP strategist on MSNBC - he looked like he was going to faint - and said something like "this goes against all the facts...all I know about the business..." An MSNBC reported said he was in Trump Tower, and some campaign workers there looked more stunned than anyone... (Except, of course, for Flynn, Kushner...Trump himself and all the others that knew exactly what was happening - probably evil Bannon too.)
ElementaryPenguin
(7,800 posts)That would be their value. Wait and see if this doesn't prove to be the case!!
FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)Amaryllis
(9,524 posts)seeing it shift against what the polls were saying...I said to my friends as we were watching, "I've seen this before. Same thing that happened in 2004."
But I was not at all sure Hillary would win and had been saying for a number of months that I was really worried with all the hacking going on that they were going to steal the election again. If they could hack into the DNC, would they stop with that? And Even MSM was reporting on Russian hacks of voter reg databases in nearly half the states and I never believed it when they said it didn't affect the vote count. Come on. Does anyone really think if they had the capability to hack voter databases, they would stop with that?
Then there was Interstate Crosscheck....
rzemanfl
(29,565 posts)mountain grammy
(26,626 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,303 posts)That Russia realizes the way to destroy our country is to get republicans elected.
Actually, the whole world knows this. Except the republicans and those who vote for them, of course.
jpak
(41,758 posts)so said the orange shitgibbon
Eyeball_Kid
(7,432 posts)But... there's still too much money to be made by using hackable machines. "The Marketplace" can only make this problem worse. It's got to be government controlled, accountable through documentation, hand counted, paper ballots. It can be done.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Michigan would be the best shot where in Wayne County (Detroit) where 70,000 ballots were blank for President. Nobody compared that to the last election to see how reasonable it seemed nor did they even look at any of the ballots that rejected as blank. We know that count is wildly high so did they flip votes to blank? That would be easier to accomplish.
Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)Pass the sniff test. But they could have flipped them to blank and claimed that the voters weren't willing to vote for either candidate. More believable.
MichMan
(11,939 posts)There were not 70K undervotes in Wayne County. That total was state wide and many were write in votes for Bernie. Write ins are only counted in Michigan if a candidate pre registers as a write in and he did not. Totals below from Wayne County website
Wayne County (contains Detroit and surrounding suburbs)
Total # of ballots cast by voters on election day = 593,865
Votes
Clinton = 390,766
Trump = 159,502
Johnson = 14,501
Stein = 6740
Castle = 1271
Soltysik = 350
Write In = 4091 ( Note; Write Ins for Bernie counted as "no votes" since he was not registered as a write in candidate)
Total = 577,221
Total of under votes = 16,644 (No idea how many of these were write ins for Bernie )
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)When I look at the official web site for Wayne County. It shows
Clinton 519,444
Trump 228,993
Write-in 5,542
etc.
http://www.waynecounty.com/clerk/1609.htm
2008 Election
Obama 660,085
McCain 219,582
Write-in 1,422
Under votes 3,233
MichMan
(11,939 posts)Either way, there was no where near the 70K you claimed
Your totals also do not include Johnson or Stein and the other fringe candidates.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Is that it was mathematically possible for there to be 70,000 undervotes in Wayne County. Fringe candidate totals would have only added clutter.
Here is a cut-and-paste listing "Detroit" undervotes. Nationwide there were over 1.75 million undervotes and that was more than double the total for 2012. Now if they were concentrated in minority communities like they were in Michigan - draw your own conclusion.
"GREG PALAST: Well, you know, people are looking for Russians, but what we had is a real Jim Crow election. Trump, for example, in Michigan, won by less than 11,000 votes. It looks like we had about 55,000 voters, mostly minorities, removed by this racist system called Crosscheck. In addition, you had a stoppageeven before the courts ordered the complete stop of the vote in Michigan, you had the Republican state officials completely sabotage the recount. They said, in Detroit, where there were 75,335 supposedly blank ballots for president75,000they said you cant count 59 percent of the precincts, where most of the votes were missing. There were 87 machines in Detroit that werethat didnt function. They were supposed to count about a thousand ballots each."
MichMan
(11,939 posts)It was "mathematically possible" for me to win the Powerball and join the 1% . Except I didn't
Tatiana
(14,167 posts)I suspect (no evidence) that either some Hillary votes were counted as "blanks" or were flipped to Jill Stein in the tabulation.
If we got a full re-count of all the paper ballots, I believe with all my heart Hillary would be proved the winner of Michigan.
MichMan
(11,939 posts)I suspect that a lot of those undervotes were write ins for Bernie. If those people had voted for Hillary, she would have won I believe.
We will never know because a candidate needs to register as a write in for them to be counted and he did not.
Quanta
(195 posts)Why are the Democratic leaders and pundits SO afraid to call it what it is? Fear of the country becoming divided? We're already there. Fear of being cast as a nutjob? Hey...if you have a D after your name, work in the media, or speak out too often and loudly, it's already happened. Fear of retalition? We need heroes in this day and age.
Such weird times we live in...
trentwestcott
(83 posts)I want to believe you're right, that this last election doesn't really reflect the country and the world I live in, but if there is a conservative cabal capable of stealing the election, why on earth would they allow Barack Obama not just one but two highly productive terms in office? For the sake of deniability maybe?
JCMach1
(27,559 posts)Meanwhile, even if this happened Obama and others would have to bury it because it would be seen to undermine the system.
Instead, focus on the Russian influence and not the worst of what they did... I.e. actual hacking of votes.
Removes tinfoil hat.
BeyondGeography
(39,375 posts)Damn him!
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)malaise
(269,062 posts)History will absolve - truth will out. The reality loser will be exposed.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)Feingold was up by 1 point and finished down by 3 points. When he conceded he said "Its going to be a while before we understand what happened tonight". That's pretty ambiguous and it could be the shock of Trump winning and the generally bad night for Democrats.
Remember, Feingold was in the Senate for 18 years. He has a statistician who knows "where the votes are" in all of Wisconsin. Nevertheless if they saw something inexplicable on election night I wouldn't expect him to come out and say it. But I'm pretty sure they saw voting patterns that didn't make a lot of sense.
jimlup
(7,968 posts)I think they flipped the whole goddamn thing. Something fishy went down on November 8, 2016.
procon
(15,805 posts)If Russia went to all trouble to hack the DNC and steal emails to be used day by to whittle away at Clinton edge that would give Trump a boost, why would they stop there? Would they leave victory to change, trusting that idiot Trump to haul his own fat ass over the finish line?
The only way the Russians were going to get what they wanted was to ensure that Trump got elected. The only sure was to do that, of course, was to make damned sure that he had the higher vote count, and there's only one way they could have pulled that off.
egold2604
(369 posts)johnnyrocket
(1,773 posts)gtar100
(4,192 posts)It's like we've got to convince a bunch of assholes against their own selfish interests before the MSM will take it seriously.
Clinton *DID* win. By all accounts she should take over as president. But I know that all the repugs would scream bloody murder if she did. As if their cheating and acts of treason allows them to keep what they've stolen. We would be compromising if we go along with a do-over. Always a double standard with conservatives. They're ideology is rotten to the core and we've got a media that normalizes it.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)the evidence emerge on its own timetable.
I am convinced the hesitancy we see in, say, Pelosi jumping on tRump is because she has seen the evidence, realizes he is toast and has decided to not get ahead of the evidence coming out. The same thing is probably happening when it comes to the vote fraud.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)"well we lived through George W and we can live through Trump" Let's face it Many Democrats in Congress give us a hell of a lot of lip service but when it comes right down to it many Democrats are eating from the Same Corporate Trough as Republicans"
ailsagirl
(22,897 posts)This country would never, EVER have voted that clod in-- never in a million years
RicROC
(1,204 posts)The elephant in the room is finally being seen! The US experienced a coup in the 2016 Presidential election and it will take brave patriots to proclaim the truth.
blueinredohio
(6,797 posts)they got far enough to change the votes, when all this is over every state should have to go through the votes to make sure it's all on the up and up
Little Star
(17,055 posts)joanbarnes
(1,722 posts)Down ballot too, look at Missouri exit polls, off by 10%! Claire McCaskill is NOW looking at it, since her job will be next. How did they do it? Didn't REPUKES show them how in 2000 and 2004?
dflprincess
(28,079 posts)"for the good of the country". Just like in 2000 and 2004 (and if Anonymous hadn't intervened, it would have happened in 2012).
The only thing that might make it different this time is that it was interference by a foreign entity, not just the normal Republican cheating. Perhaps this time the Democrats won't just roll over and let it go.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)southerncrone
(5,506 posts)to sell electronic voting machines, which can be programmed to incrementally increase votes or decrease votes w/ an algorithm. I read back in the early 2000s that they could also be altered using a laser on a certain port. Can't remember where I read this, been too long ago. IMHO, our first order of business should be getting rid of these machines & go back to paper ballots that can be physically counted. They don't need the Russians, they have these machines they can manipulate. If you take a look at the Republican takeover of this country, it has happened dramatically since the inception of these electronic voting machines.
This is a coup, make no mistake about it.
blue-wave
(4,356 posts)fairly. So they steal. They did it to Gore(Florida), Kerry(Ohio) and Hillary(what do you think the Russian thing is?). If we, as democrats, do not unite to fight and stop this type of coup, we might as well give up. It must be stopped!
We can stop this crap, it just takes money and the right kind of tough fighting spirit. Sadly, I don't see that in the democratic party of today. We need a full time department within the DNC to organize an offense that will stop the stealing before ANY election.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Sigh.
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)That's the name of Trump's "digital operation" which supposedly delivered the election to him by "suppressing" Hillary votes, wink wink nudge nudge. Turns out it's headquartered in San Antonio, oops. Anyway read all about it:
"Trumps presidential election victory is the most successful digital voter suppression operation in American history. The secret weapons in Trumps digital arsenal were Project Alamo, his database of 220 million people in the United States, and the Facebook Advertising Platform. By leveraging Facebooks sophisticated advertising tools, including Facebook Dark Posts, Facebook Audience-Targeting, and Facebook Custom Audiences from Customer Lists, the Trump campaign was able to secretly target Hillary Clintons supporters and covertly discourage them from going to the polls to vote."
I think they did a little more than discourage but anyway that's the official description.
https://medium.com/startup-grind/how-the-trump-campaign-built-an-identity-database-and-used-facebook-ads-to-win-the-election-4ff7d24269ac
TDale313
(7,820 posts)And seriously, in a democracy if people can't trust in the electoral system you really have nothing. We deserve verifiable elections and voting systems. Because even if there wasn't election fraud the mere fact that it's feasible- that there's a lack of confidence aids those who want to suppress the vote. And the answer isn't to pretend there's not a problem or refuse to address it. The answer's to fight like hell to fix what is clearly a broken system.
Dan
(3,570 posts)The software from that company - is no longer any good. If they have the source code - they own it...;
My opinion
secondwind
(16,903 posts)were manipulated from as far away as Tennessee
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)I recall seeing that there was a software being used for GOTV or some such role, but that it also somehow related to the voting machines themselves.
Now, I come across this article from several hours ago, and am curious if there is something to this.
[http://www.wctv.tv/content/news/Leaked-NSA-document-Tallahassee-based-voter-registration-software-hacked-by-Russians-426832921.html|
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)So of course, we're expected to believe that they infiltrated Multitudes of computers and software, but 100% did not touch the Tabulators or Election Night results.
Yet they expect us to vote, and want us to believe it matters. They suck us into their little game with YEARS of campaigning, and loads of money spent and donated, some by folks who can't afford it. And then they do whatever the hell they want.
And you can damn well bet, if it happened, OUR SIDE IS COMPLICIT. Go along to get along, eh?
mvd
(65,174 posts)winning the popular vote by around 3 million but also losing the electoral vote comfortably. And the states that gave the electoral vote margin were traditionally blue states. I would bet the chance given would be extremely low. Combined with all the Russia interference and allegations of hacking, something just doesn't seem right.
TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)"Without a recount, all we can do for now is look for any meaningful difference ... we checked the six other states with a margin between Clinton and Trump of less than 10 percentage points that use a mix of paper and machine voting: Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas and Virginia. For each county in those states, we looked at Clintons vote share and whether it was associated with the type of voting system the county used ...
We found no apparent correlation between voting method and outcome in six of the eight states, and a thin possible link between voting method and results in Wisconsin and Texas. However, the two states showed opposite results..."
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/demographics-not-hacking-explain-the-election-results/
"National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey: Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states."
http://www.theamericanmirror.com/fbi-nsa-no-evidence-russia-manipulated-us-vote-tallying/
mvd
(65,174 posts)You didn't address the kind of statistics I wonder about. Also your first point needs trust in the voting process, which I do not have.
TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)... but I cannot see any good reason why all your official people should join together in such a big lie. Except they did about WMDs in Iraq, but that was more wishful thinking than lying,
And since you neither has any trust in the voting process, nothing I could give you would help - and then we can only talk about feelings. I actually believe in the US voting process, but not in any other part of your corrupt two party system. For me the cheating is on all other levels, since I (and Nate Silver) cannot trace it in the actual numbers of votes. You can easily google a statistician who will tell you what you want to hear. That is why I checked these numbers myself.
mvd
(65,174 posts)..but one I think is less far fetched than it used to be. I just think a ton is yet to come out about Trump.
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)quaker bill
(8,224 posts)No statewide candidate in my experience has won the Florida county where I live by as much as Hillary did, and then went on to lose the state. Generally dem candidates that have lost only won my county by 2000 votes or so. Barack won in 2012 statewide with a margin here of 35,000. Hillary won here with a margin of more than 125,000 but still lost the state. I do not know about hacking, but something has smelled fishy here.
UCmeNdc
(9,600 posts)sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)We know social media manipulation happened at the hands of GOP and Parscale.
We know broadcast media manipulation happened with the hacking and email releases.
We also know voter data from the DCCC was hacked and leaked to at least some GOP.
We don't yet have any evidence of voter manipulation. Could be, but I'm withholding judgement until evidence arises. Until then, the media problem isn't going away and I am focusing on that for now.
linnknee
(52 posts)linnknee
(52 posts)Nitram
(22,822 posts)DFW
(54,410 posts)In 2002--FIFTEEN YEARS AGO--when the electronic voting machines were first instituted (and the Republicans started scoring "surprise upset victories" as soon as they were used, e.g. Max Cleland's defeat in the Georgia Senate) my brother told me, "give me a laptop and a cell phone, and I'll make any of those voting machines give you any result you desire." You can imagine how sophisticated they must have gotten at it in the meantime.
IN 2004, Diebold went to court to sue, successfully, to have their voting machines declared "private property," and could only be forensically examined with permission from the owners--something they never granted. In the deciding state of Ohio in 2004, where the Ohio Secretary of State was also the Bush campaign chairman, the head of Diebold said he would "deliver Ohio for Bush," something he apparently accomplished. In Ohio, ONE--count 'em, ONE--of the electronic voting machines was forensically examined before its owners could come to cart it off. It was in an out-of-the-way precinct with just 600 registered voters. The voting machine gave Bush 3000 votes in the precinct with 600 registered voters. The Republicans called it a "glitch," deducted 2400 votes from Bush's "margin of victory" in Ohio, and STILL refused to let ANY of the other machines' hard drives to be subjected to forensic examination.
If there's anyone left out there who DOESN'T get what these machines are about, then I can't help you. If the results are overwhelming in one direction (e.g. Obama in 2008 and 2012) they either can't or won't get so blatant as to tip their hand, but if they can get away with stealing an election, I'd say there is strong evidence they will, and not give it a second thought.
Top Republican strategists are not total morons. They know that in a fairly held election, they lose. Their morals are just a little loose on the subject of what they think is a legitimate way around that fact.
Raster
(20,998 posts)That is just the way it is when you blanket yourself in a failed ideology and the members of your electorate are dwindling from natural attrition. The only way you can "win" elections is to cheat.
DownriverDem
(6,229 posts)Sadly, the results will lead us to major destruction for everyone but the rich.
catbyte
(34,404 posts)I'll never believe that that SCROTUS won Michigan fair & square.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Right?
PDittie
(8,322 posts)to appreciating Glenn Greenwald (this week). Though is it time to hate on Wikileaks for something else?
http://www.thedailybeast.com/wikileaks-declares-war-on-the-intercept
These constantly-shifting alliances are really wearing me out.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)As the evidence mounts, I keep wondering what happens if tampering was found, and there is evidence that the election was compromised (or worse outright stolen by software modification)?
Does Trump just get impeached, and Pence steps in? Hardly seems right given that he was brought in on the same ticket.
Does Trump and Pence lose their offices, and Ryan steps in?
If the damage can be positively identified, and the numbers indicate that Hillary actually won, is there a legal process by which Trump/Pence is out and she's in?
If Trump/Pence were never really validly elected, does Obama come back into office (since the inauguration is invalid), is he still technically the president, even though it is over the 2 term limit?
Is there a route to a special election?
brooklynite
(94,602 posts)Nothing about voting being accurate (actually, there's no Constitutional Right to people voting); nothing about a "do-over".
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)So, you tell me to read the constitution (with the so cute and condescending "hint" , then point out that the Constitution doesn't cover it. That's right, there's nothing in the constitution that covers this.. hence.. the question.
But, thanks for your time and snark.
brooklynite
(94,602 posts)If the Constitution doesn't "cover it", it can't get added, absent a Constitutional Amendment.
The Constitution says that States select Electors; they did. The Constitution says that the Term of Office (absent Impeachment) is 4 years. It remains that way. No do overs.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)There's nothing at all in the constitution about the Supreme Court having the authority to decide an election in the event of ongoing ballot recounts.. but there's now precedent (even if they did throw in that ridiculous statement at the end of that decision).
There's nothing in the Constitution about libel or slander. In fact the first amendment would seem to specifically invalidate any such laws.. yet they are on the books, and legal through decided court precedent as well.
As far as I know, there is no precedent at all for something like this, and I'm wondering (preferably from someone who has a better understanding of the law than I do, what options there would be. You may very well be right that there is none at all, but unless you know of any law or judicial precedence, then my question is a valid one, and I don't appreciate the snark.
brooklynite
(94,602 posts)Ever since Election Day, people have been fulminating about changing the rules or the process; it simply doesn't work that way, and "they cheated" isn't an allowable reason to revisit the results. Bush v. Gore had Standing before the Court because of Federal Legislation in compliance with Article 2, Section 3 as to when Electors' ballots needed to be submitted for Congressional review. There is no Constitutional provision that says an Election has to be "fair" because there's no Constitutional right to you having a chance to vote. Your State chooses to allow you to; if you felt the Election outcome was tainted, you arguably could have gone to State Court to demand a revote before the scheduled date of the Electoral College vote, but beyond that, there's no legal basis for the entire National Election to be invalidated. Former Law Professor Barack Obama doesn't say it's possible; Former Law Professor Elizabeth Warren doesn't say it's possible. NOBODY does. The Election was fully compliant with all provisions of the Constitution. If you disagree, tell us what SPECIFIC Constitutional provision or right was violated.
(FWIW - I HAVE studied Constitutional Law; I'm not making things up.)
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)My apology for reading snark into your comment.
Agree about the posts to change the rules, but please note that I didn't suggest anything. I'm just wondering what legal options there are out there, if any.
With all the thought and consideration that the founders put into the possibility of foreign intervention in our process (such as the natural born citizen clause to ensure foreign monarchs couldn't purchase their way into the presidency), it sure seems odd that there's no recourse at all.
Response to SoCalMusicLover (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
jmg257
(11,996 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)athena
(4,187 posts)Unlike you, I don't just make claims without providing references. In Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Florida, exit polls predicted a Clinton win. If the exit polls were right, Hillary Clinton should be president today. See:
http://tdmsresearch.com/2016/11/10/2016-presidential-election-table/
Excerpt:
"Exit polls were conducted in 28 states. In 22 states the discrepancies between the exit polls and the vote count favored Trump. In 12 of these states the discrepancies favoring Trump exceeded the margin of error of the states exit poll."
I wonder why anyone would claim that the exit polls were "pretty much nuts on" when they were not even close.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)athena
(4,187 posts)The page you linked to only lists the results of the exit polls, breaking them down by gender, ethnicity, income, etc. It does not compare exit polls to actual vote totals.
I suspect that what you looked at was CNN's "projected winner" page. This is not based on exit polls alone. It's based on all the information that was available until the projection was made. The only way it would be wrong is if the projection had been wrong. A projection is not the same as an exit poll. Projections are made when actual results start coming in; it's only when exit polls show a landslide in a given state that a projection is made as soon as the polls close. Where the results are closer, they first compare exit poll results to the actual outcome to make a projection.
Here is the actual comparison of exit polls to election results, which shows that Hillary Clinton should have won:
Wisconsin: Exit poll: 48.2%-44.3% Clinton; Election result: 47.22%-46.45% Trump
Pennsylvania: Exit poll: 50.5%-46.1% Clinton; Election result: 48.17%-47.46% Trump
Florida: Exit poll: 47.7%-46.4% Clinton; Election result: 48.60%-47.41% Trump
North Carolina: Exit poll: 48.6%-46.5% Clinton; Election result: 49.83%-46.17% Trump
If you still don't believe me, here are four web sites making the point that the exit polls predicted a Clinton win:
http://www.alternet.org/something-stinks-when-exit-polls-and-official-counts-dont-match
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/09/how-wrong-were-the-polls-in-predicting-the-us-election/
http://obat-drug.info/news/2016-Exit-Polls-vs.-Actual-Results:-Trump-Lost-Election-After-All?-Here%E2%80%99s-What-May-Have-Happened
http://www.inquisitr.com/3742358/2016-electoral-map-results-comparing-exit-polls-with-elections-results-in-light-of-recount2016/
Excerpt:
"Additionally, what perplexes many voters is that the margins of the exit polls compared with the margins of the initial 2016 electoral map results are well beyond the margin of error. But its not just that. Many find it peculiar that this particular data trend only happened in four states, which were the four states that Donald Trump needed to win; Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania."
jmg257
(11,996 posts)michigan results
all states
michigan
key
presidential results
presidentprojected winner
key race16 electoral votestrump
candidate%votes
trump 47.6% 2,279,543
clinton 47.4% 2,268,839
johnson 3.6% 172,136
stein 1.1% 51,463
full details
est. 100% inupdated 2:03 pm ET, Feb. 16
county results map
And Pennsylvania:
pennsylvania results
presidential results
presidentprojected winner
key race20 electoral votestrump
candidate%votes
trump 48.6% 2,970,733
clinton 47.9% 2,926,441
johnson 2.4% 146,715
stein 0.8% 49,941
full details
est. 100% inupdated 2:03 pm ET, Feb. 16
http://edition.cnn.com/election/results/states/pennsylvania
SO these are NOT really exit polls?, but "Projected winner" polls?
Thanks - did not get that nuance!
whathehell
(29,067 posts)"Nothing will come of it" when no on e really knows that.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Just because you WANT something to be true doesn't mean it is...
Bonx
(2,053 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)Electronic voting is and always has been bullshit, and might as weel have been designed to be hacked.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)If the hacking was enough to flip the election, it was decided at a higher level than anyone who consults with Trump.
We only come back from this via paper ballots, hand-counted and published locally.
dchill
(38,505 posts)Butterflies
(1,240 posts)of course they get hacked. I knew on election night that votes were changed to get Trump in. It made me sick. The Republicans are fine with cheating as long as it is to their benefit.