Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mountain grammy

(26,624 posts)
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:31 PM Jun 2017

In Montana, land transfer threatens the American rancher's way of life

If you want to appreciate the prairie landscape that inspired President Theodore Roosevelt to set aside 230m acres as national land, you have to pull off the interstate somewhere in the Dakotas, or in the eastern third of Montana, Wyoming, or Colorado. Follow a dirt road for a few miles, roll down your windows, and shut off your engine. Do this almost any time of day, preferably in springtime. Above and below ground, the prairies are humming with life: birds, rodents, snakes, pronghorn, badgers and coyotes, rioting amid a landscape of grass and sagebrush.

A patchwork of public land comprises large blocs of this splendid and sparsely populated terrain, and while much public ground has the appearance of a nature preserve, it is mostly a working landscape. Public forage, timber, and water resources sustain thriving wildlife populations, along with millions of livestock and thousands of agricultural producers. For these people and their communities, public land isn’t a destination on a bucket list, a recreational playground, or a studio for Instagrammers – it’s a source of life to which they’re intimately connected. That’s why many ranchers are unnerved by the Republican party’s land transfer agenda, which aims to give away as much federal public land as possible to the states. While the movement gains traction among the Republican cadre, its attractiveness to rural westerners is less certain, and if it ever succeeds, it will mean a radical restructuring of the foundations of the economy and the culture of the west.


More at link: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jun/06/montana-land-transfer-american-ranchers

The GOP is about to punch a big hole in the west.. but ranchers keep voting Republican..
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Montana, land transfer threatens the American rancher's way of life (Original Post) mountain grammy Jun 2017 OP
Drunk on the Bundy elixir gratuitous Jun 2017 #1
Yes, exacty! mountain grammy Jun 2017 #2
Thanks for the google suggestion Doremus Jun 2017 #3

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
1. Drunk on the Bundy elixir
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:39 PM
Jun 2017

Management of public lands is conducted through a balancing act among federal and local governmental agencies, various stakeholders (ranchers, hunters, outdoor enthusiasts, environmentalists, extraction industries), and the local population. No one interest gets to dictate how the land is used to the exclusion of all other interests. Republicans don't like that; too much give when all they want to do is take. Ranchers and hunters by and large have backed the Republican agenda, thinking that Republicans would turn over control of federal lands to them, or at least favor them so heavily it wouldn't matter what those hippy-dippy tree-huggers wanted.

Well, surprise boys! Turns out the Republicans want to turn over wilderness lands to their wealthy pals in the extraction industries. Google "photos alberta tar sands" if you want a sneak preview of what you can expect large parts of Montana to look like if Republicans get their way.

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
3. Thanks for the google suggestion
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 07:00 PM
Jun 2017

Nobody in their right minds (or those who aren't oil magnates) would want the death and destruction such mining produces.

I'm nauseous at the sight.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In Montana, land transfer...