General Discussion

malaise

(269,054 posts) Thu Jun 8, 2017, 10:34 AM Jun 2017

New AG told him not to call it an investigation

OK then

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New AG told him not to call it an investigation (Original Post) malaise Jun 2017 OP

That seemed to be about the Clinton emails. No? Agschmid Jun 2017 #1

Not sure n/t malaise Jun 2017 #2

I got the impression it was Obama's AG that asked that. n/t woodsprite Jun 2017 #3

Same. Agschmid Jun 2017 #4

You're right n/t malaise Jun 2017 #6

He meant Loretta Lynch. And she was right to ask for that. (eom) StevieM Jun 2017 #5

Not Sessions JonAndKatePlusABird Jun 2017 #7

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)

1. That seemed to be about the Clinton emails. No?

Reply to malaise (Original post)

Thu Jun 8, 2017, 10:35 AM

Jun 2017

malaise

(269,054 posts)

2. Not sure n/t

Reply to Agschmid (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 8, 2017, 10:36 AM

Jun 2017

woodsprite

(11,916 posts)

3. I got the impression it was Obama's AG that asked that. n/t

Reply to Agschmid (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 8, 2017, 10:36 AM

Jun 2017

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)

4. Same.

Reply to woodsprite (Reply #3)

Thu Jun 8, 2017, 10:37 AM

Jun 2017

malaise

(269,054 posts)

6. You're right n/t

Reply to woodsprite (Reply #3)

Thu Jun 8, 2017, 10:39 AM

Jun 2017

StevieM

(10,500 posts)

5. He meant Loretta Lynch. And she was right to ask for that. (eom)

Reply to malaise (Original post)

Thu Jun 8, 2017, 10:38 AM

Jun 2017

JonAndKatePlusABird

(312 posts)

7. Not Sessions

Reply to malaise (Original post)

Thu Jun 8, 2017, 10:39 AM

Jun 2017

Agreed. The question was whether there was anything else besides the tarmac meeting that prompted him to make the statement about emails.

Reply to this discussion