The Five Lines of Defense Against Comeyand Why They Failed
Thursday was a bad, bad day for Team Trump. Things looked even worse at the end of the day than they did when the Senate Intelligence Committee adjourned midday.
The first line of defenserevealed by the presidents own team yesterdayis that Comey somehow vindicated Trump by confirming that he told Trump in January that Trump was not personally a target of an investigation. But if that assurance had been enough for the president, Trump would not have added the demand that Comey end the investigation of Michael Flynn. Trump evidently felt strongly motivated to protect Flynnmore strongly motivated than he had been to protect any of his other associates.
Line two of defense is that the presidents expression of a hope that Mike Flynn could be let go merely expressed a wish, not an order. But Adam Liptak, Supreme Court reporter for The New York Times, almost instantly produced an example of an obstruction of justice conviction that rested precisely on I hope languageand the all-seeing eye of Twitter quickly found more. Anyone who has ever seen a gangster movie has heard the joke, Nice little dry cleaning store, I hope nothing happens to it. The blunt fact is that after Comey declined to drop the investigation or publicly clear the president, Trump fired Comey. A hope enforced by dismissal is more than a wish.
...
Friends of the president will reply that the Comey hearing did not produce a smoking gun. Thats true. But the floor is littered with cartridge casings, theres a smell of gunpowder in the air, bullet holes in the wall, and a warm weapon on the table. Comey showed himself credible, convincing, and consistent. Against him are arrayed the confused excuses of the least credible president in modern American history.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/06/the-five-lines-of-defense-against-comeyand-why-they-failed/529743/