General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNewsweek column by law prof Michael Dorf: When Talking With Trump, Be Sure to Wear a Wire
http://www.newsweek.com/michael-dorf-when-talking-trump-be-sure-wear-wire-623810That question in turn raised a legal question. Would it be legal?
Apparently yes. Washington, D.C. is a one-party consent jurisdiction, meaning that it is legal for a person to record his own conversation with someone else, even without the other person's consent.
-snip-
Trump's modus operandi when facing unpleasant accounts of his behavior is to deny it, to attack the character(s) of the source(s), to completely mischaracterize the account, to claim that his own behavior as described was not a big deal (e.g., "locker-room talk" , and to just claim vindication in general terms.
Wearing a wire won't protect against all of these moves, but it will protect against the first two.
FarPoint
(12,444 posts)When I listen to Comey' s testimony Thursday...this concept came to mind immediately....
Justice
(7,188 posts)without warrant.
Particularly as he acknowledged in his testimony that part of listening to Trump was that he might incriminate himself.
FarPoint
(12,444 posts)One party approval rule.
Baitball Blogger
(46,758 posts)Should be a fortune cookie message, it makes so much sense.
Addendum: Make sure you're in a state that allows you to tape record private messages between two people. In Florida, you cannot if you're in a private residence.
alwaysinflux
(149 posts)Surely they pat everyone down as a precaution--he would've been caught.
FarPoint
(12,444 posts)The FBI had all the special tools... rewatch Comey from Thursday testimony...You know he did the CYA for himself and FBI... it was his duty. his professional standard.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)Gothmog
(145,567 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)Then Trump can claim it is a "fake recording"