General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow did the Bernie endorsed candidate do in the Virginia primary?
We overwhelmingly went with the other guy. Thank goodness. I was a little concerned for an hour or so.
JI7
(89,276 posts)of most Virginia democratic officials so he won.
elections are often about state and local politics so what cable news is discussing or what is important to some other town or state is not always the same with other places.
i always tell people if they want different elected officials they need to go to the people in that officials district/state and find out from them why they support that person and what issues are important to them.
Response to JI7 (Reply #1)
Demsrule86 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Demsrule86
(68,696 posts)encourage his (young) voters to turn out...there were many "Our revolution" types on the ground...but the voters didn't turn out. Perriello was endorsed by both Warren and Sanders. There is a message somewhere in there.
Demsrule86
(68,696 posts)I would add that there is no reason to believe that Sen. Sanders or Warren endorsements for that matter works in moderate or red states...as all of his picks have gone down. I mention this only to reinforce the idea that we need a big tent with a diversity of views in order to take the majority in Congress. Northam is very liberal and has run strongly against Trump. They both did.
Gothmog
(145,619 posts)brush
(53,883 posts)comradebillyboy
(10,176 posts)it wasn't really close. The guy Bernie endorsed lost.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)brush
(53,883 posts)Last edited Wed Jun 14, 2017, 01:34 AM - Edit history (1)
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)jonno99
(2,620 posts)Demsrule86
(68,696 posts)I would not give them a wooden nickel.
Cha
(297,731 posts)brush
(53,883 posts)He maybe needs to stand down as his endorsement is popular with his die-hards, with others, not so much.
This split doesn't bode well for 2018 which is the last thing we need.
A certain Dem-bashing non-Dem continues to be a problem.
Cha
(297,731 posts)Demsrule86
(68,696 posts)brachism
(82 posts)Ralph Northam did have the endorsement of Virginia political establishment, but mostly importantly the endorsement of the next president of the United States, Terry McAuliffe.
Demsrule86
(68,696 posts)Cha
(297,731 posts)DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Otherwise your bizarre gloating is kinda meaningless, isn't it?
Demsrule86
(68,696 posts)party...the only exception was When President Obama was re-elected in 12...and we had Governor ultrasound running.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)I really hate some people here.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... will the message be heard?
Demsrule86
(68,696 posts)Perhaps now, some will admit...that one size does not fit all in terms of candidates...and economics are important but so are other things...and we need a big tent approach.
FSogol
(45,529 posts)Northam needs to tie Trumpy and all the GOP corruption around Gillespie's neck.
Demsrule86
(68,696 posts)jalan48
(13,888 posts)The west will lead the way for change-not the conservative southern states.
Demsrule86
(68,696 posts)quite often.This is why I give no money to groups like 'our revolution'...while I often agree with their politics, they go after Democrats and not Republicans. This is a deal breaker for me. I also won't vote for any of their candidates in a primary for the same reason. I don't think Sen. Sanders has as much influence over actual voters as some think.
jalan48
(13,888 posts)On the climate issue alone, incrementalism is a deadly strategy. My hope is that a progressive block can be created in this country and their ideas and energy spread out from there. Conservative politics will be the death of us all.
Demsrule86
(68,696 posts)is baloney. Sometimes, it is incrementalism or nothing. I don't see how primarying Democrats in safe seats...waste of money and time will do any of what you say. We risk losing those seats with a new person.
jalan48
(13,888 posts)If the people choose to go the more conservative route, so be it. I will always look at who is bankrolling the candidate, it's an indicator of how they will behave in office.
Demsrule86
(68,696 posts)you won't win otherwise. I am not willing to say 'so be it' to conservative governance...some policy is better than none and actually losing progressive policy going back to Roosevelt.
jalan48
(13,888 posts)Demsrule86
(68,696 posts)although I agree with 'our revolution' and groups like this politically, I don't support them at all...if they were fighting the GOP instead of wasting money in blue states primarying sitting Democrats, it would be different. Even running Perriello was a bad idea. Northam was a great candidate and money and time was wasted with this primary.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,721 posts)Hell, you're sporting a Mariners logo, so I'll assume you're local.
Bernie won the WA caucuses, Hillary won the popular vote. It looks to me like Bernie supporters are a vocal minority. That seems to work for the Repubs, I don't think it does so well for Dems. I'll withhold judgement.
Change itself is not bad, but we're learning first hand what amateur hour in the White House looks like. Not all Dem incumbents are evil.
jalan48
(13,888 posts)MineralMan
(146,333 posts)who are not even from that state don't really carry a lot of weight. Local endorsements are far more important.
In the end, Bernie Sanders is a Senator from Vermont. That's who he is and has been. Most people in this country have never even been to Vermont. He's also a former primary candidate for President, but did not prevail and get the nomination.
Still, Senator Sanders is more than welcome to give his endorsement to whomever he chooses. What affect that endorsement will have, however, may not determine which candidate has the best chance to win. Other things are far more important in most elections that an out-of-stater's endorsement, frankly.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Bernie is Bernie. We can't define everyone he endorses on that endorsement alone. That in itself gives Sanders more respect and power than he deserves. We need to get behind the Democrat who wins the primary. "The other guy" stated that before the votes were even counted. That means something to me.
I'm not saying we should ignore what you have stated. It's just that we need to judge the candidates on their own merits. I'm not big on Sanders but I would gladly accept his endorsement if I were running.
ProfessorGAC
(65,212 posts)Divisive clap-trap
mythology
(9,527 posts)It has long since gotten tiresome.