General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBreaking on CNN - US Destroyer taking on water after a collision
with a merchant ship - near Japan. Injuries
MontanaMama
(23,322 posts)Hoping everyone makes it off the boats okay.
<snip>
The guided missile destroyer Fitzgerald collided with a merchant vessel just southwest of Yokosuka, Japan at around 2:30 a.m. local time on Friday, according to a Navy release.
In a brief written statement, U.S. Pacific Fleet in Hawaii said the Navy has requested assistance from the Japanese Coast Guard, the Associated Press reported.
The statement said Friday that the USS Fitzgerald collided with a merchant ship 56 nautical miles southwest of Yokosuka, Japan. A U.S. defense official said there is flooding in three compartments of the Fitzgerald and there were injuries.
Pacific Fleet said the extent of injuries and damage to the Fitzgerald are "being determined," and the incident is under investigation, according to the Associated Press.
Laffy Kat
(16,383 posts)Horrible.
As if the whole ordeal isn't bad enough, the merchant vessel our Navy destroyer collided with is from the Philippines. I hope that maniac Duterte doesn't use this as an excuse for crazy behavior.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)jpak
(41,758 posts)that would be the place to do it.
rzemanfl
(29,565 posts)dalton99a
(81,526 posts)Navy Destroyer Calls for Assistance After Collision Off Japan
Navy officials are making damage assessments after the Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer Fitzgerald collided with a merchant ship southwest of Yokosuka, Japan.
The collision happened around 2:30 a.m. Saturday local time. An official familiar with the incident could not confirm which country the merchant vessel hailed from, but characterized it as large and like a container ship.
The Fitzgerald had been conducting routine operations in Sagami Bay, about 56 nautical miles southwest of Yokosuka, a Pacific Fleet spokesman, Lt. Cmdr. Matt Knight, told Military.com.
The destroyer sustained an unspecified amount of damage, and Navy officials have requested assistance from the Japanese Coast Guard, Knight said.
NutmegYankee
(16,200 posts)But the injuries probably require evac.
malaise
(269,063 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,200 posts)If the lean is bad, they can counter flood trim tanks. These ships can take a lot of beating.
Remember the USS Cole:
malaise
(269,063 posts)Thanks for the reminder
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)At the same time our ships are amazing works of art, actually, and unless someone was hurt in the initial impact, there should be no further injuries.
NutmegYankee
(16,200 posts)I was pointing out that the design of war ships is that they expect to get holes punched into them and design compartments to be closed and sealed while being small enough to not sink the ship.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)I hadnt had time to read it yet.
NutmegYankee
(16,200 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 16, 2017, 11:50 PM - Edit history (1)
of the cargo ship. The bulbous bow could cause unseen damage below the water line.
Leith
(7,809 posts)No more naming ships Fitzgerald. It's bad luck.
LisaM
(27,813 posts)It does seem to be a fraught name.
canetoad
(17,169 posts)Hard to tell without knowing the circumstances, but it's been hit on the starboard side and I think maritime rules that power vessels always give way to starboard.
malaise
(269,063 posts)which means it had the right of way - just heard that on ABC
mercuryblues
(14,532 posts)is a seafarer's saying.
canetoad
(17,169 posts)I did the Coastguard small vessel course, so it's very rusty now. I recall an ultimate overrider to rules at sea; take any action possible to avoid a collision.
malaise
(269,063 posts)to change direction - here both are huge.
canetoad
(17,169 posts)No point in a fishing dinghy claiming right of way over a container ship.
EX500rider
(10,849 posts)....a Captain and bridge crew just saw their careers evaporate.
malaise
(269,063 posts)looks like casualties
NutmegYankee
(16,200 posts)malaise
(269,063 posts)You seem very informed
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)But yeah.... that's not gonna look good on the FITREP.
lpbk2713
(42,760 posts)There probably won't be much haggling to do emergency repairs either.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,330 posts)Persisted
(290 posts)malaise
(269,063 posts)Link above
Persisted
(290 posts)Didn't remember the name of the war ship for that disaster
cwydro
(51,308 posts)DU never fails to jump to conclusions.
Persisted
(290 posts)Professing a hope that one is not witnessing a potential start to a war is very different from jumping to the conclusion that we are facing one.
DJT is perfectly capable of wagging the dog.
countryjake
(8,554 posts)I've been following this online but haven't seen anything like that anywhere else.
Everything I'd read earlier said there were injuries.
malaise
(269,063 posts)Too sad
csziggy
(34,136 posts)U.S. Navy destroyer collides with container ship near Japan, suffers damage
By Anna Fifield and Thomas Gibbons-Neff June 16 at 7:31 PM
TOKYO A U.S. Navy destroyer, the USS Fitzgerald, collided with a container ship off the coast of Japan early Saturday morning, causing significant damage and flooding.
Local broadcaster NHK reported that seven sailors were missing, while the U.S. Navy said one sailor was being medically evacuated.
The Fitzgerald was 56 nautical miles southwest of Yokosuka, the home of the U.S. Navys Seventh Fleet, when it collided with a loaded container ship at about 2:30 a.m. local time, the Navy said.
NHK showed footage of the Philippine-flagged container ship named the ACX Crystal with minor damage to its bow. The vessel is roughly 700 feet long and was bound for Tokyo before colliding with the Fitzgerald, according to a maritime traffic tracking website.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/us-navy-destroyer-collides-with-container-ship-near-japan-suffers-damage/2017/06/16/111df46e-52e7-11e7-b74e-0d2785d3083d_story.html