Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

diva77

(7,643 posts)
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 11:03 PM Jun 2017

Whether or not Handel actually won, the focus should be on abolishing DREs that "elected" her

Is the Dem message soooo terrible that we need to tweak it everytime we "lose" or is it possible to consider that other factors played a major role (restating what has been said frequently on DU) : voter suppression, and total lack of transparency in the election process with the use of paperless DREs

It's time for citizens to demand transparent elections. Right now, elections officials are denying that elections lack transparency. This has to change.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Whether or not Handel actually won, the focus should be on abolishing DREs that "elected" her (Original Post) diva77 Jun 2017 OP
I so agree! CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2017 #1
We need to repeat, over and over: "ALL elections must be with paper ballots and MUST be audited" JoeOtterbein Jun 2017 #2
We need paper ballots, hand counted at the precinct level with public oversight diva77 Jun 2017 #3
agreed; paper "trails" and occaisional audits are not as good as hand-counting, all the time. nt TheFrenchRazor Jun 2017 #10
It would also make election night more exciting n/t trentwestcott Jun 2017 #15
Not only paper ballots, but we also need to require an ID at the polls trentwestcott Jun 2017 #11
Do you have any idea how hard it would be to use in person voter fraud mythology Jun 2017 #14
It might not be an issue now, but if we block them from using the machines to cheat trentwestcott Jun 2017 #16
I think here in Ga. we MUST demand a verifiable audit trail! If we start today, we might be napi21 Jun 2017 #4
If you can get paper ballots, hand counted at precinct with results posted at precinct prior to diva77 Jun 2017 #5
Verifiable audit trail simply means the capability of tracing a vote from origin, no matter napi21 Jun 2017 #6
might help to contact people involved in filing GA lawsuit against SOS diva77 Jun 2017 #7
the problem is that the paper receipts will never see the light of day 99.999% of the time; in order TheFrenchRazor Jun 2017 #9
I'd like paper too, but I don't think that will ever happen. People are far to impatient to napi21 Jun 2017 #12
absolutely, because without verifiable elections, we never really know what "went wrong." TheFrenchRazor Jun 2017 #8
Amen and I say again Amen!!!! stevepal Jun 2017 #13

JoeOtterbein

(7,700 posts)
2. We need to repeat, over and over: "ALL elections must be with paper ballots and MUST be audited"
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 11:05 PM
Jun 2017

. (it needs repeating!)

diva77

(7,643 posts)
3. We need paper ballots, hand counted at the precinct level with public oversight
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 11:09 PM
Jun 2017

The method for hand counting at the polls has a built in audit that happens immediately - which is the safest.

 

trentwestcott

(83 posts)
11. Not only paper ballots, but we also need to require an ID at the polls
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 05:53 AM
Jun 2017

It's great to go to paper ballots, but what's to stop them from voting multiple times, or voting for the dead, or even people who don't even live in a particular state voting out of state? We should follow Mexico's lead and have a voter ID card.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
14. Do you have any idea how hard it would be to use in person voter fraud
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 12:32 PM
Jun 2017

And have it be meaningful? It's silly to claim it's an issue.

 

trentwestcott

(83 posts)
16. It might not be an issue now, but if we block them from using the machines to cheat
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 09:08 PM
Jun 2017

...who knows what they'll come up with. You know how much money the Koch brothers have, and how much more they can get. I wouldn't put it past them to pay people to vote in close states, that's all. I'm not trying to push the old GOP lie that a million undocumented immigrants are voting, but if we're going to lock it down, then let's lock it down.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
4. I think here in Ga. we MUST demand a verifiable audit trail! If we start today, we might be
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 11:37 PM
Jun 2017

able to get one done for the 2020 election. I intend to begin tomorrow by contacting our Governor, & my state Senator &
Representative. I will continue with LTTEs with hopes of getting enough citizens to complain that they won't be able to ignore us anymore. I think we can even get Pubs to join us by explaining to them that at any time in any district, a Dem could win and continue to put our real votes in question.

Will any Georgian reading this join me?


I just posted the above on another thread here on DU. I ask the same question here.

Will any Georgian reading this join me?

diva77

(7,643 posts)
5. If you can get paper ballots, hand counted at precinct with results posted at precinct prior to
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 11:56 PM
Jun 2017

ballot transport, that would be ideal. Not sure what you mean by verifiable audit trail. Fight for what is transparent. Don't compromise!! Good luck!

on edit: I recommend including your Sec'y of State and your county elections official as well

napi21

(45,806 posts)
6. Verifiable audit trail simply means the capability of tracing a vote from origin, no matter
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 02:06 AM
Jun 2017

what it was (electronic, paper, optical scanner, by a reader, or punch card(god forbid anyone is still using those), all the way through to it's final tally result. We are both talking about the same thing. AFAIK this is usually done by attaching a printer to the electronic voting machine that produces a master list AND a receipt for the voter to confirm the votes they cast. I already know the excuse I'm going to get. "It costs too much and we can't afford it!" My response of course is "Altered votes cost us a lot more!" Er Georgians haven't had confidence in our vote count since the electronic voting was installed back in 2002!

diva77

(7,643 posts)
7. might help to contact people involved in filing GA lawsuit against SOS
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 03:09 AM
Jun 2017

strength in numbers if you hook up with them, perhaps! Check out this link:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029131536

 

TheFrenchRazor

(2,116 posts)
9. the problem is that the paper receipts will never see the light of day 99.999% of the time; in order
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 03:59 AM
Jun 2017

in order to get a comprehensive recount comparing the paper to the machines totals, you must first prove that there is a reason (a discrepancy between the totals), and you can't prove there is a discrepancy until you've had the recount, so it's a catch-22. audits are also very limited and seems to me that an audit function would be about the easiest thing for a hacker to defeat. bottom line is we need all paper ballots, all hand-counted, the first time, on election night.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
12. I'd like paper too, but I don't think that will ever happen. People are far to impatient to
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 09:56 AM
Jun 2017

WAIT for humans to count all those ballots, and the media would flat out freak! The answer must be some enhancement of the electronic voting. There IS A WAY! We use similar systems to operate our banking system, health care. stock, market, and every other system the entire world economy relies on.

 

TheFrenchRazor

(2,116 posts)
8. absolutely, because without verifiable elections, we never really know what "went wrong."
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 03:41 AM
Jun 2017

totally secure, verified, all-paper elections are a prerequisite for everything else.

 

stevepal

(109 posts)
13. Amen and I say again Amen!!!!
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 12:19 PM
Jun 2017

Dems need to quit beating themselves up over something that they have no control over. As long as the vote is counted on the unverifiable DREs and voter suppression is rampant, there's no way Dems are going to win any close election. It's time Dems aimed their energies at something that's relevant and it's not money. Dems had plenty of do-re-me for Ossoff. The problem as the poster indicates was and is the DREs and voter suppression. We need to start ranting about something that is based in reality.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Whether or not Handel act...