Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,908 posts)
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 12:46 AM Jun 2017

A friend wrote:

'7 months ago, Tom Price won Georgia's 6th by 23 points.

7 months ago, Mick Mulvaney won South Carolina's 5th by 21 points.

Results are still coming in, but it looks like Jon Ossof is going to lose GA-6 by around 5 points.

It looks like Archie Parnell is going to lose SC-5 by fewer than 4 points.

That means in the space of 7 months, the work people on the ground did there and the broader work we do daily have swung margins by 18 and 17 points in those districts. That's unheard of.

Yes, we lost the elections, but we made up nearly 20 points in each of these districts in the space of a few months.

If you take that as a sign to give up, if you take that as a defeat, then you were looking for a savior, someone to come along and give you a sign that the hard part's over.

The hard part is not over.

We made up nearly 20 points in each of these elections, a mark that's only reinforced in special election after special election this year.

That shows you the work we all do can change things. Yet we still lost these elections. That shows you we're still in the middle of this work. There's still a lot to do.

We lost two elections we had no business even contending in. From 23 points down to 5 down. From 21 points down to 4 down.

We're going in the right direction. Immediate miraculous victories would have been nice, but the truth is that these things are just products of the work we do. If we did the work to put districts like this in play in 7 months, what do you think we can do in another 7 months? Keep your head up. Keep at it. We are making a hell of a difference.'

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A friend wrote: (Original Post) elleng Jun 2017 OP
If everyone saw it this way we'd never lose BannonsLiver Jun 2017 #1
You go! I agree. Thanks for sharing. n/t MLAA Jun 2017 #2
Thanks for this! furtheradu Jun 2017 #3
Ah yes, another "moral victory" post. Still In Wisconsin Jun 2017 #4
so the concept of "gains" or districts turning more purple mean nothing? JHan Jun 2017 #6
Exactly. In fact they mean LESS than nothing. Still In Wisconsin Jun 2017 #11
Well I agree that the strategy needs to improve - JHan Jun 2017 #13
That was part of it... all the Hollywood endorsements ended up being used AGAINST Ossoff... Still In Wisconsin Jun 2017 #14
Perhaps, but the reason why Elleng's post is important is because: JHan Jun 2017 #17
With all the emphasis our side placed on this race? Still In Wisconsin Jun 2017 #20
It can't be a fall backwards, backwards to what? JHan Jun 2017 #22
No, it was an 18 point shift toward the Dem in a DEEP RED district. Please see the math. LBM20 Jun 2017 #25
Still in Wisconsin, eh? elleng Jun 2017 #7
Yup, where Scott Walker keeps *almost* losing by the same margin as Karen Handel Still In Wisconsin Jun 2017 #9
Well then, why are you even here? blue neen Jun 2017 #12
The cheese? A-Schwarzenegger Jun 2017 #21
But there is this little thing called math. And the math is moving in our favor. Period. Full stop. LBM20 Jun 2017 #24
great post Elleng! Thank you! JHan Jun 2017 #5
You're welcome, JHan. elleng Jun 2017 #8
Hmmm Lotusflower70 Jun 2017 #10
Thanks for the post...I needed that pep talk tonight. ONWARD.... iluvtennis Jun 2017 #15
You're welcome. So did I need a pep talk. elleng Jun 2017 #16
Exactly! Phoenix61 Jun 2017 #18
How much of the earlier, larger wins were due to the incumbent effect? MarcA Jun 2017 #19
I feel the pain of the 'another moral victory crowd,' and the right wing noise machine TrollBuster9090 Jun 2017 #23
Thanks, Buster, elleng Jun 2017 #26

JHan

(10,173 posts)
6. so the concept of "gains" or districts turning more purple mean nothing?
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 12:53 AM
Jun 2017

Demographic changes? Gradual shifts in attitude? That's a sign to beat up ourselves?

You think any Republican would indulge in that kind of thing if they nearly beat a Democrat in a dem stronghold? they'll bolster their efforts is what they'd do.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
11. Exactly. In fact they mean LESS than nothing.
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 12:59 AM
Jun 2017

This kind of thinking is no more or less than a rationalization for continuing the same FAILING strategies. We can't win elections right now. We're getting our asses handed to us because we're incompetent as a movement, and as an organization. A loss is a loss is a loss. Karen Handel goes to Washington, Ossoff goes in the political dumpster.

JHan

(10,173 posts)
13. Well I agree that the strategy needs to improve -
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 01:02 AM
Jun 2017

though Ossoff in my view did a lot of things right. I was just in another thread where people were saying maybe these small elections shouldn't get such a national profile, that it hurts Dems in the long run. Whatever movement we engage in will require mass mobilization and we need to control the narrative better.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
14. That was part of it... all the Hollywood endorsements ended up being used AGAINST Ossoff...
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 01:06 AM
Jun 2017

They were able to make him the "Liberal Hollywood" candidate like... um, Hillary Clinton. We just don't learn.

JHan

(10,173 posts)
17. Perhaps, but the reason why Elleng's post is important is because:
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 01:19 AM
Jun 2017

Ossoff over performed - he was supposed to be dead in the water. If that same passion can be repeated in swing districts, we take the house.

that's why it's important to see this as a few steps forward instead of a massive step back. When was the last time a Democrat held this district?

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
20. With all the emphasis our side placed on this race?
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 01:32 AM
Jun 2017

Sorry, no disrespect intended, but it was a giant fall backwards. An ass kicking.

JHan

(10,173 posts)
22. It can't be a fall backwards, backwards to what?
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 03:54 AM
Jun 2017

What ground did we lose? We haven't held that district in years - not since Carter.

If a district turns purple it means that district can be turned and efforts need to be sustained.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
9. Yup, where Scott Walker keeps *almost* losing by the same margin as Karen Handel
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 12:56 AM
Jun 2017

But our Dem candidates came sooooooo close, ya know.

Lotusflower70

(3,077 posts)
10. Hmmm
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 12:56 AM
Jun 2017

Good points and although it sucks to lose, it is important to remember that this is a start. Have to stay strong and keep fighting.

Phoenix61

(17,006 posts)
18. Exactly!
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 01:20 AM
Jun 2017

Real change takes time. The repubs didn't create this disaster in 7 months. They have been working at it for years. It's going to take a lot of effort to turn this around. But, I'm with you. We can do this.

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
23. I feel the pain of the 'another moral victory crowd,' and the right wing noise machine
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 03:54 AM
Jun 2017

is certainly going to be spinning it that way for months. (Trump is already gloating.) But there IS such a thing as a TIPPING POINT.

Think of it this way:

Republicans lost 20% margins in deep red, safe seats. (All of those seats were considered rock solid, in deep red, gerrymandered districts. That's why they were chosen.) And yet they had to fight tooth and nail to hold onto them.

Had to fight tooth and nail to defend deep red seats...AND THE REPUBLICANS HAVEN'T EVEN HAD THE CHANCE TO DO ANYTHING UNPOPULAR YET. Yes, Trump's personal style is deeply unpopular, which is why he's sitting at 60% disapproval ratings. But he's only half the equation. The other half is what the GOP Congress will do. The House passed a mean-assed 'wealthcare' bill that will yank health insurance away from millions of people, all for the sake of giving a tax break to billionaires. Because it hasn't become law yet, the outrage was mostly symbolic. There was a big noise, and when the dust cleared, everybody still had their Obamacare.

Just watch what happens when the Senate tries to pass THEIR version of GOP-care. Even TRUMP will line up against it.

If Republican-Care doesn't pass...they're screwed with their base
If Republican-Care passes...they're screwed with everybody else.
If they raise the debt ceiling, they're screwed with their base.
If they don't raise the debt ceiling, they're screwed with everybody else, including the plutocrats who fund their campaigns.
If they try to reform the tax code, they'll run into an army of lobbyists who fight over every penny of every loophole that favors plutocrats. So, they're just going to leave all the loopholes in it, leave the tax code at 10,000 pages, and just lower the rates across the board. The deficit will explode before they've spent a penny on infrastructure.

If you think those margins of victory are small now...just wait until the Republican Congress gives people something to REALLY be upset about. I think the next year will be a true tipping point for the 2018 midterms, and then we have the new CENSUS coming in 2020, which will give us a chance to undo some of the gerrymandering that rigs the system against Democrats. There's a reason Republicans have a 50% seat advantage in the House, while things are essentially even in the Senate. And it has nothing to do with their messaging. It's pure gerrymandering and voter suppression.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A friend wrote: