Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,308 posts)
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 11:41 AM Jun 2017

Lots of People Have Lots to Say About Congressional Elections

My questions to everyone who is talking about the GA-06 election are these:

Where do you live? How are things in your congressional district? Who represents you? How about your immediate neighboring districts?

Here's the bottom line: What you think should happen in a congressional district far from yours is irrelevant. Congressional elections for House seats are purely local elections. If you don't live in that district or very near it, what you think doesn't matter, really.

How is your own district doing? Do you have a Democratic representative in the House? If not, that's where your focus should be, not on some district hundreds or thousands of miles away in some other state. You can't do a damned thing about that district, but you can in your own and neighboring districts. I suggest we all start there.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MineralMan

(146,308 posts)
3. I don't understand why people don't get that.
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 11:45 AM
Jun 2017

I think national campaign funds are useful in local districts, but that's about it. The people who live there can figure out how to spend them. They know their district. They know the people in their district. They know the issues in their district. Congress is elected one district at a time. I suggest we fund district campaigns, but otherwise leave them to the locals.

I further suggest that individuals focus very closely on their own districts and districts near them in their own states. There's tons of work to be done locally that will actually affect the results locally. How often do we forget to pay attention to our own location and think more about some place where we have never even been.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
5. I also think these races might have suffered
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 11:49 AM
Jun 2017

from Dems nationalizing them. Red districts don't like the Democratic party. If someone is to win there, they need to speak to those constituents. Their concerns and values are often very different from the national party or ours.

Notice how the candidate in SC did better than Ossoff. He didn't have the focus of the national party, and that may have been an advantage.

MineralMan

(146,308 posts)
9. Yes, that's always a danger of trying to nationalize
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 11:52 AM
Jun 2017

a local election. Ossoff over-performed in GA-06. That's a good thing. Sadly, he didn't win, but that's not an enormous surprise.

I don't really know much of anything about that congressional district. I've been in Atlanta a couple of times, but I know nothing about political realities in Georgia.

I think he had a chance to win, but he didn't. I could not begin to explain why, because I don't live there, nor do I understand what factors were in play.

DBoon

(22,366 posts)
2. A District far far away votes for policies that hurt me
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 11:45 AM
Jun 2017

A republican in Georgia that votes to gut ACA will harm many millions of people outside of her district.

We are not talking about local school taxes or where to place stop signs - house seats involve national issues that inherently cut across the country.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,857 posts)
6. Yes. All of those who are talking about that special election in Georgia,
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 11:49 AM
Jun 2017

especially if they aren't happy with the results there, need to be very active in their own local politics. Become a precinct chair. Run for office. Go door-to-door on behalf of good Democratic candidates. Run for office. Volunteer for local candidates, including your Senators, Representatives, and Governors. Maybe even run for office yourself.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
8. that's not entirely true
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 11:50 AM
Jun 2017

...many campaigns welcome and encourage support from outside their state.

Of course, not all campaigns wish to nationalize their races, but Trump provides a good opportunity to attract support with an eye to turning the House and Senate based on opposition to his presidency.

I live in Md. and there's normally very little needed to nudge our legislators into action on behalf of our Democratic agenda.

I do, however, lend my advocacy (and opinion) to races in areas where Democratic support is scarce or wanting. I understand that most pols don't normally recognize opinions and advocacy from folks outside their districts, but I hope my opinion matters, along with my support.

MineralMan

(146,308 posts)
10. I think financial support is always a good thing.
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 11:54 AM
Jun 2017

But I also think that's about it. Local races should be run by locals, in my opinion. If they have additional funding, that's great, but influence in how the campaign is run from outside often has the wrong focus.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
13. well, you've experienced some of this firsthand, I'd guess
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 12:17 PM
Jun 2017

...but I thought you were talking about discussions like the ones we're having here.

I think these discussions have the potential to provide some insight outside of the campaign bubble that occurs sometimes in the best of organizations. I do understand any resentment or rejection of outsiders making decisions about local affairs, but insulating the process from outside opinion seems foolhardy.

I've been following public commentary since the days when letters to the editor were the most effective means of average folk's input and impact on the nation's intellectual debate. I think this level of public debate is invaluable, and I wish more folks would participate and weigh in, not less.

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
14. I'm not at all sure that discussion here has any insight
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 12:37 PM
Jun 2017

to contribute....if you think the local democrats are unaware of the issues/needs/concerns of their local community perhaps the issue is that people on DU are not just outside the campaign bubble but literally disconnected with reality.

niyad

(113,306 posts)
15. dougie lamborn is the clueless jackass for this district. he is apparently glued to his seat,
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 12:47 PM
Jun 2017

but we are trying to dislodge him.

our last candidate, Misty Plowright, did a very credible job against overwhelming odds.

MineralMan

(146,308 posts)
16. Keep pushing.
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 12:51 PM
Jun 2017

Not every district is winnable, sad to say, but eventually, it might become winnable.

Still Colorado Springs...a tough nut to crack.

niyad

(113,306 posts)
17. this district has not been winnable for a very long time, but we do not give up.
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 12:53 PM
Jun 2017

dougie is terrified of us, which is all to the good.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lots of People Have Lots ...