Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObstruction of Justice?
How is Trump's Comey tapes bluff not obstruction of justice? If he claimed there were tapes of his conversations with Comey in order to try to change Comey's testimony, how is that not obstruction of justice through witness intimidation? Doesn't trying to change someone's testimony fall under obstruction of justice?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1724 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obstruction of Justice? (Original Post)
erpowers
Jun 2017
OP
What if you are not the one under investigation? How/why would you know if you are intimidating a
jmg257
Jun 2017
#1
That's akin to telling a witness in any other case that if they talk, you'll burn their house down.
shraby
Jun 2017
#3
Ah - that makes some sense - thanks! Comey was in charge of related investigations.
jmg257
Jun 2017
#5
jmg257
(11,996 posts)1. What if you are not the one under investigation? How/why would you know if you are intimidating a
witness?
shraby
(21,946 posts)3. That's akin to telling a witness in any other case that if they talk, you'll burn their house down.
Whether or not you're on the hot seat or just a friend of the one who is, i.e. a mob enforcer.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)5. Ah - that makes some sense - thanks! Comey was in charge of related investigations.
shraby
(21,946 posts)2. That is intimidation of a witness. I've heard several lawyers on the t.v. state this too.
That was my first thought as well. A contributing factor to obstruction of justice.
Doodley
(9,135 posts)4. Only a guilty man with a lot to hide would try so many times to obstruct justice.
This is the second story in the last 24 hours about Trump trying to influence the course of justice, after the Don McGhan story.