Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 12:09 PM Jun 2017

If There Are SCOTUS Retirements Soon,

as some are predicting, we will discover just how big a mistake we made in November of 2016, and we will feel the excruciating pain that mistake will have caused. This is what so many knowledgeable, experienced Democrats warned everyone about well before the election. Too many Democrats and other progressives ignored them and we failed to carry enough states to defeat Donald Trump.

If Trump gets to name a couple more Justices, we are going to know what it means to wail and gnash our teeth. We could have prevented this from happening. We should have prevented it from happening. We did not prevent it from happening, and we may soon understand how important 2016 truly was for the future.

We were warned. Some of us were helping to warn everyone about the consequences of Republicans winning control of all three branches of federal government. But we didn't pay enough attention and let a few issues keep us from following through and electing a Democrat as President, while losing even more legislative seats in Congress and our state legislatures.

We don't deserve what may happen, but we certainly earned it. I'm sorry, but this is just righteously frustrating at this time. This situation was preventable, but we did not prevent it. Shame on us all!

Sorry for the scolding. I could not help my self from posting this.

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If There Are SCOTUS Retirements Soon, (Original Post) MineralMan Jun 2017 OP
I don't buy this "we" argument. There were many of us who recognized the dangers Arkansas Granny Jun 2017 #1
despite hacking from russia and massive voter suppression, we still got 3 million more votes. unblock Jun 2017 #2
Well, you may get a chance to learn something over the next MineralMan Jun 2017 #3
2018 can't save the SCOTUS seats... Moostache Jun 2017 #4
Yes. They'll be too late for that. MineralMan Jun 2017 #5
The Senate confirms SCOTUS justices. stopbush Jun 2017 #41
We have to win the Senate back in 2018. athena Jun 2017 #46
33 Senate seats are up for contention in 2018. stopbush Jun 2017 #47
Don't forget about decades of propaganda from Fox and right wing radio. sharedvalues Jun 2017 #12
Indeed. Their policies are so unpopular they have to lie unblock Jun 2017 #13
It's over now anyway with Gorsuch in. Instead of 5-4 decisions they'll be 6-3. brush Jun 2017 #6
Gorsuch maintained the existing 5-4 as he was replacing Scalia. SaschaHM Jun 2017 #7
Adding Gorsuch restored a ninth justice to the court. There was a 4-4 stalemate... brush Jun 2017 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author LenaBaby61 Jun 2017 #30
"Our only hope is taking the House in 2018." LenaBaby61 Jun 2017 #40
How often did we hear that the court didn't matter? BainsBane Jun 2017 #8
Exactly. We must remember and remind as we go forward. MineralMan Jun 2017 #9
Doesn't Kennedy see how morally bankrupt the GOP is? Does he still want a GOP justice to replace hi sharedvalues Jun 2017 #11
I don't know what Kennedy is thinking. MineralMan Jun 2017 #14
If Kennedy cared about America he would have retired three years ago. sharedvalues Jun 2017 #15
Again, I don't know what he thinks. MineralMan Jun 2017 #17
The biggest effect Kennedy can have on the country is sharedvalues Jun 2017 #35
To be fair everyone thought Hillary would win sharedvalues Jun 2017 #36
True, but mcturtle would have stonewalled that, too unblock Jun 2017 #18
He's a moderate with a slight right lean. He knows his replacement wouldn't be Amishman Jun 2017 #44
You're correct, of course. MineralMan Jun 2017 #45
He's a republican unblock Jun 2017 #16
He's a real Republican. A 1970s Republican sharedvalues Jun 2017 #37
I'd like to think so, but I know way too many republicans unblock Jun 2017 #38
Don't forget all the District and Circuit openings, Trump now gets to fill those as well Lurks Often Jun 2017 #19
Yes, of course. Many things will result from Trump being President. MineralMan Jun 2017 #21
Sorry, plenty of people were paying attention Lurks Often Jun 2017 #23
What's this 'we' business? Kingofalldems Jun 2017 #20
"We" can mean many things. MineralMan Jun 2017 #22
Any SCOTUS retirements will prove their allegiance is to Putin aeromanKC Jun 2017 #24
CNN: Anthony Kennedy retirement watch at a fever pitch spanone Jun 2017 #25
You got it MM, and for those who said there was no difference, or Hillary was worse, people may just still_one Jun 2017 #26
"The Jill Steins and Susan Sarandon's should be ridiculed and ignored for the frauds they are." LenaBaby61 Jun 2017 #42
No more judicial confirmations. This is the last year of the Republican tRump Presidency. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2017 #27
Good luck with that. nt B2G Jun 2017 #32
Long term, a McCain 08' victory may have been better. Dawson Leery Jun 2017 #28
No. Duh. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2017 #33
I know how you feel. Dawson Leery Jun 2017 #29
It's not just SCOTUS B2G Jun 2017 #31
criminals and foreign agents stealing elections have consequences. nt elmac Jun 2017 #34
Problem is. Once again we DID win and are failing to remedy these horrendous thefts judesedit Jun 2017 #39
Some of us did try to warn people athena Jun 2017 #43

Arkansas Granny

(31,518 posts)
1. I don't buy this "we" argument. There were many of us who recognized the dangers
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 12:17 PM
Jun 2017

of a Trump Presidency and did all we could to elect Hillary. There were a number of circumstances that were unexpected and beyond our control (Comey's statement, Russian interference) that had a significant effect on the election results.

unblock

(52,253 posts)
2. despite hacking from russia and massive voter suppression, we still got 3 million more votes.
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 12:17 PM
Jun 2017

yeah, yeah, yeah there's always something we could have done better, more, other, whatever.

but this election was rigged and stolen, plain and simple.

it's time we stop this pointless self-castigation and work together to stop the real problems -- republicans and their foreign allies undermining democracy, preventing americans (mostly democrats) from voting, making it hard for americans (mostly democrats) to vote, buying propaganda, and lying to the american people without consequence.

convincing another million democrats to vote is certainly a good idea, but if republicans can respond by just cheating by another million votes, we haven't really solved the problem, have we?

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
3. Well, you may get a chance to learn something over the next
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 12:27 PM
Jun 2017

few years. It will not be a pleasant lesson, I assure you. We have another chance coming up, in 2018. We could turn this around and then attempt to undo the harm that has been done.

I hope we behave more sensibly for that election than we did in 2018.

Donald Trump? Really? How did he become President? Think about that and just what would have had to happen to prevent that outcome.

Beyond that, I have no other response to your reply.

Moostache

(9,895 posts)
4. 2018 can't save the SCOTUS seats...
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 12:32 PM
Jun 2017

WE are well and truly fucked on that count...the only hope is Justices holding on for 3 more years...I am now going to throw up for a while...

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
5. Yes. They'll be too late for that.
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 12:34 PM
Jun 2017

As you say, I hope no Justices retire until after that. Some are saying, though, that there could be retirements.

We have failed to prevent this. I'm just disappointed and sad about that.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
41. The Senate confirms SCOTUS justices.
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 04:29 PM
Jun 2017

No one believes the Ds have a chance at taking back the Senate in 2018.

Which means we are going to have a RW- stacked SCOTUS within the next couple of years, and that political leaning will extend for decades into the future.

And what THAT means is that even if the Ds take back the Congress and the presidency, Rs will have an ideologically bent SCOTUS that they can turn to whenever a piece of legislation gets passed that they don't like.

athena

(4,187 posts)
46. We have to win the Senate back in 2018.
Sun Jun 25, 2017, 11:15 AM
Jun 2017

I don't care if no one says we have a chance. We have to do all we can to make it happen. Many things can happen in 1.5 years, and the last four special elections have shown that we can be competitive even in very red areas. Democrats don't typically vote in midterm elections. If we get organized and get out the vote like never before, we may be able to win back the Senate.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
47. 33 Senate seats are up for contention in 2018.
Sun Jun 25, 2017, 12:36 PM
Jun 2017

Only 8 of them are Rs. Those 8 include Orrin Hatch, Bob Corker and Ted Cruz.

Of the 25 Ds seats, more than a few are in red states. That doesn't bode well for us.

Yes - we need to fight. But the first step to fighting is knowing what you're up aganist.

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
12. Don't forget about decades of propaganda from Fox and right wing radio.
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 01:07 PM
Jun 2017

As has been said, probably 15% of America would vote GOP if not for GOP media propaganda.

brush

(53,787 posts)
6. It's over now anyway with Gorsuch in. Instead of 5-4 decisions they'll be 6-3.
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 12:38 PM
Jun 2017

The trickle of vote suppression laws happening now will become a tsunami because their backers will know SCOTUS will uphold them and therefore cement repugs wins across the board.

Same with Roe v Wade, transgender bathroom bills and all the other repug wish-list laws.

Even if trump is somehow pushed out, his SCOTUS appointees stay.

Our only hope is taking the House in 2018.

There is hope there as a trump backlash of unrealized jobs promises seems to be forming.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
7. Gorsuch maintained the existing 5-4 as he was replacing Scalia.
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 12:41 PM
Jun 2017

Kagan, Sotomeyer, Ginsberg, and Breyer are still on the court. It would take one of them retiring (and being replaced by Trump) to make it go 6-3.

brush

(53,787 posts)
10. Adding Gorsuch restored a ninth justice to the court. There was a 4-4 stalemate...
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 01:05 PM
Jun 2017

that existed because of the repugs refusal to move on Obama's appointee.

That 4-4 alignment actually benefited us while it lasted.

With Gorsuch and the 5-4 imbalance back on the bench now any further replacements justices under a repug admin will most likely result in even more lopsidedly conservative decisions from SCOTUS.

It's unfortunate but we're looking at generational dominance by wingers on the court.

Response to brush (Reply #6)

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
40. "Our only hope is taking the House in 2018."
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 04:24 PM
Jun 2017

That's IF our votes even COUNT in 2018.

Several from our intelligence agencies have said that the ruskies are gearing up and coming for us in 2018. Per Cliff Watts/Malcolm Nance, they've never stopped interfering or working on their next way to screw Dem voters, and I'm sure they'll come with the new tricks up their sleeves for 2018. Like THIS DOJ is going to stop them? tReasonous tRumputin says that this "russher thing is a hoax." Well, he HAS to say that, or else. In fact, tReasonous tRumputin and the tReasonous GOP--and lying/racist sidekick beauguard will make SURE our votes don't count in 2018. There isn't much time before 2018 to fix what's wrong with voting across this country. Do you have faith in THIS Dept. of Homeland Security? From all I've heard/read, they've not really contacted anyone in any state to check out their voting apparatus & they've made no attempt to secure voting machines that I know of. I've no clue as to what we can do about this, as we're the minority party who'll get NO help from this skeleton crew running the various voting agencies across this country.

Finally, we KNOW that thuglicans will be voter-suppressing off the chain in 2018. Again, whose to stop them? Yes, I'm aware that the courts have given Dems a few good rulings as it relates to voter suppression/gerrymandering (TX & NC). However, there are going to be some court rulings along the way where we won't get a favorable rulings. The high court is taking up a case from WI about gerrymandering: http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a54672/supreme-court-gerrymandering-wisconsin/

Gorsucks is on the court so uh, I think that after the WI case is ruled on in favor of allowing gerrymandering to stand, WI is gone from the Dems column, and will stay red for the unforeseeable future. Same goes for MI, Ohio, Fl. etc. Our only REAL hope is Meuller (Hope he HAS the integrity all say he has), and who knows how long his investigation takes? It's looks to be wide-ranging & all-encompassing and hella thorough--it looks to be expanding, and even if Meuller finds many, many cases of impeachable offenses against the tReasonit-in-chief, WILL thuglicans actually impeach him? They need him in there so they can continue destroying this country. Ryan's BEEN wanting to get rid of health care and social security since he was in college, so he won't vote to impeach the traitor. Ryan's a treasonous traitor, we know McConnell also. McCain talks a good game against the ruskies, but in the end he IS a thuglican after all.

Dems will be living through a hideous russian winter for a LONG time only here in the USA, because if we can't vote to throw the thuglican bums OUT in 2018 and they end up increasing their numbers in the Senate and House thuglicans don't care about the ruskie interference thing. Some say "What russian interference?" They love power and owing all 3 branches of government and destroying people's lives. It's party over country for that group.

I won't even want to think about 2020, because I'm about to eat lunch and don't want to ruin my appetite any further.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
8. How often did we hear that the court didn't matter?
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 12:48 PM
Jun 2017

That making arguments about it was weak, a cop out. Well, here we are. Those who decided our lives weren't important enough to get over their anger to vote for the Democrat helped put the fascist and his court in place. I realize they don't care and are happy with the fact they were able to punish so many Americans less privileged than themselves, and now millions will suffer due to their actions. And yet they still complain we aren't catering to their demands, as though no one else matters at all.

I will continue to work on GOTV and turn out as many votes as I can, regardless of how they may have voted in 2016 or any other election. But I will never forget or forgive.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
9. Exactly. We must remember and remind as we go forward.
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 01:01 PM
Jun 2017

The same people who gave such bad advice are still around and will speak again in the same way in the future. We should remember and remind everyone when those message begin again here and elsewhere.

In reality, we're already hearing them, even now.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
14. I don't know what Kennedy is thinking.
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 01:09 PM
Jun 2017

Deciding to retire is a personal decision, and can be based on many factors. It's his decision, really. My only regret is that the country elected Donald Trump as the person to appoint new SCOTUS justices. That has the potential for real disaster.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
17. Again, I don't know what he thinks.
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 01:12 PM
Jun 2017

The reasons for SCOTUS Justices to keep their seats or walk away are probably more complex than any of us realize. Eventually, though, they all leave the bench at some point, and we need to keep that in mind during every presidential election and Senate elections. We need not to lose sight of that at any time.

But, that takes a little foresight and thought. Both things appear to be in short supply in our electorate, though.

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
35. The biggest effect Kennedy can have on the country is
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 03:26 PM
Jun 2017

choosing when he retires.

That's a big deal. We should hold him partially responsible if he retires now and the seat is filled with a hate filled GOP partisan.

Amishman

(5,557 posts)
44. He's a moderate with a slight right lean. He knows his replacement wouldn't be
Sun Jun 25, 2017, 10:07 AM
Jun 2017

President Obama wanted progressives on the court and did so.
Trump put a deep conservative on the court.
He probably wants another moderate on the court, which isn't in the cards, our political system is too polarized for it. Tough choices for someone with his ideology

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
45. You're correct, of course.
Sun Jun 25, 2017, 10:12 AM
Jun 2017

The problem, though isn't Justice Kennedy. He probably has good reasons for retiring, if he does do that. The problem is that we have a President who will select his replacement and who is a complete jerk. He will appoint someone who will seek to punish Americans, not protect them.

We knew, or should have known, that if Trump got into the White House, he would have opportunities to appoint Supreme Court justices during his term in office. Many people warned of that, but some sat out the election or voted for third party candidates. In just three states, that resulted in the electoral college vote going to Trump.

Justice Kennedy, if he resigns, knows all that, but may have excellent personal reasons for resigning at this time. I cannot blame him. I blame those who let Trump win. That is where blame should be attached, very frankly.

unblock

(52,253 posts)
16. He's a republican
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 01:12 PM
Jun 2017

I think he would agree that a trump-chosen replacement would be overly right-wing and too partisan, but I can't see him thinking that he'd prefer to be replaced by a democratic president.

Besides, he may not have a choice given his age and maybe his health and whatever he'd like to do with his remaining time. If it's time to go, it's time to go.

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
37. He's a real Republican. A 1970s Republican
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 03:29 PM
Jun 2017

He's not a 2000-on, GOP, autocratic, purchased-by-the-0.01%, repeating Murdoch/Koch talking points Republican.

Many 1970s Republicans are now Democrats.

You'd think Kennedy would care enough about America to hold on another year till possible impeachment.

unblock

(52,253 posts)
38. I'd like to think so, but I know way too many republicans
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 03:40 PM
Jun 2017

who hang their heads in shame and hold their noses, but will never change their vote.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
21. Yes, of course. Many things will result from Trump being President.
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 01:23 PM
Jun 2017

None of them will be good for the country or for any of us. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Too bad we can't have it before the election, eh? However, foresight was available, and shared widely. Not enough of us were paying attention, apparently.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
23. Sorry, plenty of people were paying attention
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 01:25 PM
Jun 2017

but they were ignored, mocked and alert swarmed when they even raised the possibility of 2016 being a close election.


And so there are no accusations or confusion, I never thought Sanders could win the general election.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
22. "We" can mean many things.
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 01:24 PM
Jun 2017

In this case, it means the entire electorate of the United States. You and I are both part of that "we," whether we like it or not.

aeromanKC

(3,324 posts)
24. Any SCOTUS retirements will prove their allegiance is to Putin
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 01:56 PM
Jun 2017

And not to American Democracy and Constitution.

spanone

(135,844 posts)
25. CNN: Anthony Kennedy retirement watch at a fever pitch
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 01:58 PM
Jun 2017
Washington (CNN)Justice Anthony Kennedy, the man who so often determines the outcome of the most controversial Supreme Court cases, is himself the center of brewing speculation.

Will he stay or will he go?

The rumors have swirled for months and the 80-year-old justice has done nothing either personally or though intermediaries to set the record straight on whether he will step down.

Helping drive the speculation, dozens of Kennedy's former clerks are traveling to Washington to participate in a private clerk reunion that occurs regularly -- and many of them wonder if it will be their last chance to meet with him while he is still on the bench.


http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/24/politics/anthony-kennedy-retirement-rumors/index.html

still_one

(92,219 posts)
26. You got it MM, and for those who said there was no difference, or Hillary was worse, people may just
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 02:17 PM
Jun 2017

Last edited Sat Jun 24, 2017, 04:41 PM - Edit history (1)

find out how insane that advice was

The Jill Steins and Susan Sarandons should be ridiculed and ignored for the frauds they are

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
42. "The Jill Steins and Susan Sarandon's should be ridiculed and ignored for the frauds they are."
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 04:38 PM
Jun 2017

Don't forget about Cornell "Bernie would have destroyed tRump" West.

Has he made a statement about what could happen if this death bill happens? All he ever talks about is Neo-Fascism when he talks about tRumputin, but that's only AFTER he goes after Hillary.

If he has made a statement about this death care bill, let me know.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
28. Long term, a McCain 08' victory may have been better.
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 02:29 PM
Jun 2017

Let the system drain out. 20% unemployment. Democrats win in 2012 and get a strong hand to repair the damage. Democratic ideas persisted for over 2 generations after the great depression.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
29. I know how you feel.
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 02:33 PM
Jun 2017

I don't care about the middle of this country. They can go to hell.
The Evangelicals and Catholics hurt this country beyond repair. More than any Muslim could have.

athena

(4,187 posts)
43. Some of us did try to warn people
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 11:25 PM
Jun 2017

but they were so overwhelmed by their sheer hatred of Hillary that they didn't hear the message. I thought people had learned their lesson after the 2000 election and was amazed to see that they hadn't. I tried to tell several DUers that the 2000 election showed that one doesn't "teach the Democratic party a lesson" by letting the Republicans win. But they all knew better.

If you just imagine what kind of a world we would be living in now if Gore had become president in 2000 -- that we probably wouldn't have had 9/11; that we wouldn't have invaded Iraq; that hundreds of thousands of lives would have been saved across the world; that innocent people wouldn't have been tortured; that there would have been no ISIS; that we would have reduced the rate at which we're destroying our environment; that Samuel Alito and John Roberts would not be on the SCOTUS -- it's shameful and heartbreaking that we made the exact same mistake only sixteen years later.

All I can say is that I hope those who allowed their hateful sexism to blind them to reality are pleased with the very-male and very-macho president they got themselves. I hope they're happy that they kept the presidency of the United States all-male. I hope they're delighted that they are not being led by a highly intelligent, highly experienced, and highly competent woman. I hope they're tickled pink with joy, because their selfish sexism has hurt too many people, and we're only six months into this.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If There Are SCOTUS Retir...