Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you're 50-65 and in the individual health insurance marketplace (Original Post) SHRED Jun 2017 OP
I know and I'm scared. hamsterjill Jun 2017 #1
A good band-aid until single-payor universal would be to allow buying into Medicare at age 50. roamer65 Jun 2017 #2
Yep. 51 and currently on spouses policy. Freethinker65 Jun 2017 #3
Add 3 pre existing conditions (2 of which are chronic) to the age group and I'm triple screwed. BigmanPigman Jun 2017 #4
I've already lost mine Blue_Roses Jun 2017 #5
Sorry to hear that SHRED Jun 2017 #7
Apparently Cons At That Age Don't Get Sick Or Need Health Care... Grassy Knoll Jun 2017 #6
Agreed, but I don't think it's going to pass customerserviceguy Jun 2017 #8
We have become a f'ing third world healthcare nation with this buffoon Congress democratisphere Jun 2017 #9
I'm a preexisting condition being sued by a hospital. hunter Jun 2017 #10
Yep ornotna Jun 2017 #11
That's me MiniMe Jun 2017 #12

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
2. A good band-aid until single-payor universal would be to allow buying into Medicare at age 50.
Sun Jun 25, 2017, 10:44 PM
Jun 2017

Then to phase in single-payor universal Medicare by 2025.

Freethinker65

(10,024 posts)
3. Yep. 51 and currently on spouses policy.
Sun Jun 25, 2017, 10:48 PM
Jun 2017

I have a very manageable autoimmune pre-existing condition. My husband is seven years older than me and was hoping to retire in his early sixties. I was planning on buying health insurance to bridge the gap to medicare on the exchange. I may not be able to afford it now.

BigmanPigman

(51,611 posts)
4. Add 3 pre existing conditions (2 of which are chronic) to the age group and I'm triple screwed.
Sun Jun 25, 2017, 10:53 PM
Jun 2017

Actually, if you were ever had allergies, had an irregular pregnancy, etc those are considered pre existing conditions now too. We are all screwed I think.

Blue_Roses

(12,894 posts)
5. I've already lost mine
Sun Jun 25, 2017, 11:02 PM
Jun 2017

Jan 1. My provider through the exchange dropped out and it left one provider, which no one takes here in Texas. Talk about bullshit. And on top of that, I had been seeing a doctor regularly after a three week stay in the hospital last April. I contacted bacterial pneumonia, which gave me sepsis.

After two trips to the emergency room, with the doctors telling me I had a strain of the flu that didn't "register", I became so ill in the shower that I slipped and broke my foot. So I went back to the emergency room AGAIN! This THIRD trip to the emergency room showed I was septic, along with an infection in my foot. The sepsis went straight to the open bone in my foot and I ended up with osteomylitis (bone infection).To try and make this long story short, it's been a year of recovery and surgeries. This really is sad what they are trying to do to us in this country.

Grassy Knoll

(10,118 posts)
6. Apparently Cons At That Age Don't Get Sick Or Need Health Care...
Sun Jun 25, 2017, 11:17 PM
Jun 2017
Sad To Be A RWNJ On Welfare Who Supports Scrotum Lips Don.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
8. Agreed, but I don't think it's going to pass
Sun Jun 25, 2017, 11:55 PM
Jun 2017

I cannot see them getting to fifty votes in the Senate, plus Pence to put it over the top. Even if I'm wrong, I cannot see the House GOP passing the Senate's bill, and if it goes to conference committee, I don't think the product of that committee can get 50% in either house of Congress.

The only reason the GOP in the House mustered enough votes was to be able to lay the blame on the Senate for failure to deliver on the repeal-and-replace campaign blather, knowing full well it would not get past them.

I cannot see anything other than the GOP effort failing, with Trump blaming them, and greasing the skids under the failure of the ACA. I'm glad that I can only see a period from September 2018, when my significant other retires, and I will no longer be eligible for coverage as a domestic partner, and November 2020, when I become eligible for Medicare. That's only a bit more than two years to go without coverage, and I have a reasonable sized Health Savings Account to get me through that time, as well as very few health problems of any kind at my age. I know that many people are not all that lucky.

hunter

(38,317 posts)
10. I'm a preexisting condition being sued by a hospital.
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 12:24 AM
Jun 2017


Sadly, not my first time on this merry-go-round.

ornotna

(10,803 posts)
11. Yep
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 12:31 AM
Jun 2017

Can't afford it now. Will be able to afford it even less if this passes. I lose a $5100 tax credit and premium goes up $3500 as well. Yay me.

MiniMe

(21,717 posts)
12. That's me
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 01:41 PM
Jun 2017

Turning 60 in August, paying $1,100 a month for insurance, have 2 pre-existing conditions. Really worried about what is going to happen to my insurance and to the premiums. I was only paying $600/month when the ACA first went into effect.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you're 50-65 and in th...