Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,070 posts)
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 07:27 AM Jun 2017

Frank Rich: Just Wait


Just Wait

Watergate didn’t become Watergate overnight, either.
By Frank Rich

June 25, 2017 9:03 pm

snip//

In the decades since, Watergate has become perhaps the most abused term in the American political lexicon. Washington has played host to legions of “-gates,” most unworthy of the name, and the original has blurred in memory, including for those of us who lived through it. Now, of course, invocations of Watergate are our daily bread, as America contemplates the future of a president who not only openly admires Nixon — he vowed to put a framed Nixon note on display in the Oval Office — but seems intent on emulating his most impeachable behavior. And among those of us who want Donald Trump gone from Washington yesterday, there’s a fair amount of fear that he, too, could hang on until the end of a four-year term that stank of corruption from the start. Even if his White House scandals turn out to exceed his predecessor’s — as the former director of national intelligence James Clapper posited in early June — impeachment is a political, not a legal, matter, and his political lock on the presidency would seem secure. Unlike Nixon, who had to contend with Democratic majorities in the House and Senate, Trump has the shield of a Republican Congress led by craven enablers terrified of crossing their Dear Leader’s fiercely loyal base. That distinction alone is enough to make anti-Trumpers abandon all hope.

I’m here to say don’t do so just yet. There’s a handy antidote to despair: a thorough wallow in Watergate, the actual story as it unfolded, not the expedited highlight reel that most Americans know from a textbook précis or cultural artifacts like the film version of All the President’s Men. If you look through a sharp Nixonian lens at Trump’s trajectory in office to date, short as it has been, you will discover more of an overlap than you might expect. You will learn that Democratic control of Congress in 1973 was not a crucial factor in Nixon’s downfall and that Republican control of Congress in 2017 may not be a life preserver for Trump. You will find reason to hope that the 45th president’s path through scandal may wind up at the same destination as the 37th’s — a premature exit from the White House in disgrace — on a comparable timeline.

The skids of Trump’s collapse are already being greased by some of the same factors that brought down his role model: profound failings of character, disdain for the law (“If the president does it, that means that it is not illegal,” in Nixon’s notorious post-resignation formulation to David Frost), an inability to retain the loyalty of feuding White House aides who will lawyer up to save their own skins (H. R. McMaster may bolt faster than the ultimately imprisoned Nixon chief of staff H. R. Haldeman), and dubious physical health (Trump’s body seems to be bloating in stress as Nixon’s phlebitis-stricken leg did). Further down the road, he’ll no doubt face the desertion of politicians in his own party who hope to cling to power after he’s gone. If the good Lordy hears James Comey’s prayers, there may yet be incriminating tapes as well, Trump’s weirdly worded denial notwithstanding.

The American University historian Allan Lichtman, famous for his lonely prediction of Trump’s electoral victory, has followed up that feat with The Case for Impeachment, a book-length forecast of Trump’s doom. The impeachment, he writes, “will be decided not just in the halls of Congress but in the streets of America.” I’d go further to speculate that Trump’s implosion is more likely to occur before there’s an impeachment vote on the floor of the House — as was the case with Nixon. But where Nixon’s exit was catalyzed by an empirical recognition that he’d lost the votes he needed to survive a Senate trial, in Trump’s case the trigger will be his childish temper, not the facts. He’s already on record as finding the job to be more work than he bargained for. He’ll tire of being perceived as a loser by nearly everyone except the sort of people he’d never let in the front door of Mar-a-Lago — and of seeing the Trump brand trashed to the point of jeopardizing his children’s future stake in the family kleptocracy. When he’s had enough, I suspect he’ll find a way to declare “victory,” blame his departure on a conspiracy by America’s (i.e., his) “enemies,” and vow to fight another day on a network TBA.

But as was also true with Nixon, some time and much patience will be required while waiting for the endgame. The span between Nixon’s Second Inaugural and his resignation was almost 19 months. Trump’s presidency already seems as if it’s lasted a lifetime, but it’s only five months old. Never forget that the Watergate auto-da-fé wasn’t built in a day.


more...

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/06/frank-rich-nixon-trump-and-how-a-presidency-ends.html?utm_source=eml&utm_medium=e1&utm_campaign=sharebutton-t
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,732 posts)
1. READ THIS!!! It's the best comparison of Nixon/Watergate to Trump
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 08:57 AM
Jun 2017

that I've ever read. It describes exactly the mood I remember when the Watergate investigation was going on, and it's a lot like what we are seeing now. We knew Nixon was lying through his teeth and that he was involved in the coverup all the way up to his beady eyeballs. We saw gutless Republicans defend him and accuse the press of conducting a "witch hunt." We worried that there was no way to get rid of Nixon. And we liberals went absolutely ballistic on account of the Saturday Night Massacre, and even then the GOPers defended him. It took the steady erosion of public support, and the GOPers' realization that their election prospects were deteriorating, to get them to even consider impeachment. The Republicans who finally decided Nixon had to go came to that conclusion not because they were principled defenders of the Constitution (they weren't; they were just as craven as today's GOPers), but because Nixon had become the proverbial albatross around their necks. Rich predicts the same will happen with Trump.

This is a must-read!

luvtheGWN

(1,336 posts)
12. I don't understand why the position of President
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 09:42 AM
Jun 2017

is immune to Lady Justice. When Nixon said "If the President does it, it isn't illegal", just as several Trump surrogates have echoed, it basically defies the rule of law. Were the Founding Fathers trying to emulate the monarchy without calling it that?

George II

(67,782 posts)
2. In the Watergate scandal, it took more than two years for Nixon to resign...
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 08:59 AM
Jun 2017

...from the time of the break-in.

If that's the "schedule" to use as a guide, we're way ahead of that now.

DownriverDem

(6,228 posts)
3. So true, but
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 09:00 AM
Jun 2017

The country will suffer big time because of trump and the repubs. We were all warned, but naïve & foolish voters just didn't get it. They have and/or will very soon.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
4. I agree w/some of this, but disagree with Trump resigning of his own volition.
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 09:04 AM
Jun 2017

Trump doesn't quit. Ever. He sees himself as a winner, even when he loses. He never quits.

He will never resign unless forced to. He will need to know that there are enough votes to impeach him or remove him, so that he will have no choice but to resign or get impeached: either way, he is forced to leave.

The Republicans in this Congress will NEVER vote to impeach him. They knew since last year that Russia was taking over our election system so that Trump would win illegally, and they championed Russia's cause. Still do. They are looking forward to the 2018 elections being hacked.

Today's Republicans are not like the Republicans of several decades ago. They are solely focused on their agenda, their tax cuts, their mega-wealthy donors. They would sell the country out for it, and have. Not all of them. But most of them. In the opinion of some of them, in fact, the government is the evildoer and is unnecessary and takes money and freedom from them, the only "we, the people" that count.

Our checks and balances system doesn't seem to be working. There is a Special Counsel, but no independent counsel. There was the judiciary, but now we're looking at Justice Kennedy-connected stacked Supreme Court, with a looming retirement by Justices Kennedy and Ginsburg.

All is not lost yet. It's in the hands of a few Republicans in the Senate (the House of Rep. is lost). And in the hands of the Democrats to gain enough seats in the 2018 election to get control of Congress...if they are ready to fight like hell.

I believe we have a de facto Russian White House. And most Republicans in Congress support that, in return for money. Our representatives are also being run by an oligarchy, now, which matters more to them than their constituents. That's the situation.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,732 posts)
7. I disagree. The Republicans of the '70s were just like today's GOPers.
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 09:23 AM
Jun 2017

Those guys were just as focused on satisfying their wealthy constituencies by cutting their taxes and screwing the poor as the McConnells of today. The main difference is that now, because of the Internet and 24-hour news, we are much more aware of how toxic these assholes are; in the '70s it was a lot harder to follow what was really going on. But the notion that there were honorable GOPers who cared more for their country than for their party is largely false: the Republicans who finally decided Nixon had to resign made that decision because they didn't want to go down with his sinking ship at the next election.

And Nixon was every bit as determined to win at all costs as Trump is. He had the same attitude, just for a different reason: Nixon grew up poor; he didn't get into one of the top law schools; he felt he was looked down on by the Ivy Leaguers and the East Coast elites. He hated them and wanted to show them up. Trump, while born to wealth, came from the wrong side of the tracks and was also not accepted by New York's old money society, which regarded him, quite correctly, as a low-class arriviste. Trump has spent his whole life trying to impress and outdo the disdainful upper-class New Yorkers by accumulating wealth and slapping his name on everything. He, too, has to win at all costs. Nixon resigned because he saw that as less of a loss than impeachment, and he spent the rest of his life trying unsuccessfully to rehabilitate his reputation. I can see Trump resigning, too, if he can find some circumstance whereby he can call it "winning."

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
9. We will agree to disagree. Back then, the Repubs were FRIENDS with the Dems.
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 09:33 AM
Jun 2017

They had lunch together, worked on bills together, were shocked by anti-American actions by the President. Yes, both parties were partisan, but never left their duty to the country at the door, in return for money.

There was no tea party then. The average Republican now is an extreme version of the Republican then. The average Republican THEN was like a moderate Republican now, and there aren't many of those.

If you watch a documentary about Trump that explains his past and discusses his mentor, you will see a clearer picture of his personality and decision making M.O. He is at war. Always. His mentor taught him to go after the jugular brutally and destroy people, if they do something he doesn't like. Like a mob boss. His mentor taught him to never give up. So Trump sues...he's sued thousands of times, for anything and everything. He will refuse to pay a bill to a painting contractor, even though it's peanuts to him. Nothing is too small to go to war over.

It's like a mob boss protecting his turf. He never says uncle. What does a mob boss do? They don't give up or resign ever, unless they are forced to, like facing years in prison or else. Even then, a mob boss wouldn't necessarily resign.

Cosmocat

(14,565 posts)
11. Republicans in the 70s saddled up with Russia?
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 09:41 AM
Jun 2017

This is a pretty romantic, and naive, take that we just have to wait and things will play out like the did with Watergate.

It also ignores what has happened since then - increasingly worse scandals with republicans being held in equal proportion TO THE OPPOSITE in accountability.

Watergate - a domestic political scandal with a coverup. Led to Nixon resigning and a boatload of prosecutions of underlings.

Reagen - pick the scandals, but lets go with Iran Contra. Reagen got firewalled and the country blissfuly let him off the hook based on the republican's reasoning that he simply was too senile to know what all was going on around him. A handful of underlings suffered consequences.

Bush II lied the country into Iraq. Literally nothing happened, just some nominal congressional investigations. Nancy Pelosi flat took impeachment off the table before 2006 mid terms.

Meanwhile, they spent the 90s using the federal government as a tool to desperately find a way to impeach Clinton, and followed that up by totally shutting down the congress for BHO's last 6 years.

We have seen over that time, republicans get increasingly radicalized, exponentially the last 8 years AND full out in not giving a shit because ...

This country relentlessly indulged right wing fuck wittery.

45 in 1,000 times worse in every way than Nixon. His family grifting on an international level, his conflicts of interest.

AND ... Russia.

That alone illustrates how empty this just wait and let it play out thing is.

This country has, literally over night, allowed itself to be Vlad Putin's she dog.

Led by the "Party of Reagen."

Christ, as much of a POS of Nixon was, he would have put a bullet in his own skull before he let Ruskies into the Oval office and had a back slap fest like 45 did.

Cosmocat

(14,565 posts)
8. People just don't get it
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 09:26 AM
Jun 2017

his leaving the Oval Office is going to like the final scene in Scarface ...

gordianot

(15,238 posts)
6. Republicans have an added incentive to wait two years.
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 09:06 AM
Jun 2017

If the get beat badly in 2018 they can blame Trump,

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
10. Comrade Casino, the republican Draft-Dodger-in-Chief
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 09:37 AM
Jun 2017

is going down. And so is his republican Cabal of Colluding Cronies.

Republican treason against America will not stand.

lindysalsagal

(20,692 posts)
13. Never bet against Frank Rich. Smart man.
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 09:50 AM
Jun 2017

I agree that fRump's impulsiveness will be his undoing. One day he'll walk out of the white house in a huff, never to return. We'll hear the arguing "he didn't really mean it."

lambchopp59

(2,809 posts)
15. I have a prediction here:
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 09:59 AM
Jun 2017

Just an inkling, but how I see things presently: Both the Faux-Noise mesmerized masses, the 1 percenter actual constituency and the RW congress critters much like McTurtle, seldom peek out of their shells to see how idiotic they look now. We saw a glimpse of a call for civility after the horrible baseball shooting incident.
I'm seeing a pattern daily at my hospital work: We're losing so much of the angry red-hatters at an unprecedented rate. They insist that stupid hospital teevee be turned to Faux-Noise "nothing to see here, everything's peachy-keen with Frump, you can die now peaceful in the fact you furthered the hateful agenda we convinced you to admire".
Nothing like this existed in Nixon's day. And I predict a possible self-destructive outcome after we sweep congress clean of much of the RW scum:
The Donald feeds on the constant praise and goes totally nuclear on anyone who criticizes him. If he had a congress as obstructionist, as disagreeable and as downright obstinate as it was the last 6 years of President Barack Obama's term:
OUR choice for a leader remained cool, collected, tempered any annoyance with graceful and intellectual banter under unprecedented obstinance.
How would the Donald react? See where I'm going with this?
I predict a total meltdown in year 3 of Cheeto's presidency If he doesn't cause all his loyalists to turn their backs on him before then due to massive FBI evidence bomb. I put my money on the former due to congress RW lock on everything shielding this buffoon from himself, they'll continue "dancing the sidestep" till after 2018. So I disagree with the author above, I believe this congress IS shielding Cheeto, massively.
Two reasons I expect a massive shift of congress: The loyal Trumpers will likely be far more complacent on turnout in the midterms. The pure shit show blasted all over media everywhere has finally grabbed worldwide attention of the millennials, and I believe they will turn out in unprecedented numbers to help place better congresspeople in office.

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
16. I don't see Trump resigning
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 10:10 AM
Jun 2017

The entire narrative on the right seems to be that of an ostrich hiding its head in order to avoid witnessing the melee that is forming around it. Most of the Congress, the right wing press, and the MAGA crowd are united in their blissful ignorance. As long as they convince themselves that this is a liberal ploy, or sour grapes after losing the election, they will not address the true core issue at hand: that Trump and his cohorts, in concert with many in the GOP, colluded with the Russians to throw the 2016 election.

For his base, Trump won't let up. He'll continue to spin oddball tales and tweet disjointed and incriminating messages and the masses will be appeased. How could he then do a 180 and resign, a tacit admission of guilt if ever? No, he'll play the "political victim" card to the bitter end, in order to maintain that narrative in the months and years that follow. Instead, he'll continue the path he's chosen, and go down kicking and screaming...if he goes down at all.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Frank Rich: Just Wait