Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 04:07 PM Jun 2017

Justice Kennedy, 80, did NOT retire today.

Thank you, Justice Kennedy, for hanging in there.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/06/supreme-court-justice-anthony-kennedy-did-not-retire-today.html

There was a lot of news at the U.S. Supreme Court today, including an initial ruling on Donald Trump’s travel ban and a major “religious liberty” decision. But perhaps the biggest news was the story that did not break: a much-rumored retirement announcement from Justice Anthony Kennedy. The 80-year-old jurist did not make any announcement this weekend at a much-discussed reunion of his law clerks (the timing of which fed the retirement rumors), and did not do so today, either, as the current Court term ended.

There is no rule, of course, that SCOTUS retirement announcements occur at any particular time. In 2005, Sandra Day O’Connor stepped down in mid-summer. But the odds have definitely gone down that Kennedy is planning anything other than putting the robes back on in the fall.

The frenzy over the possibility of a Kennedy retirement may strike some as a good example of media overkill or Beltway insularity. But it is hard to overestimate the impact of this event, had it occurred, and not just on the Supreme Court. Yes, Kennedy is very often the “swing vote” in an equally divided Court. So the opportunity for Donald Trump to replace him with a more reliable — and predictable — conservative could tilt constitutional law to the right on a broad range of issues.

But more specifically, a Kennedy retirement would create the possibility of a fifth vote on the Court to reverse or significantly modify Roe v. Wade and the constitutional right to abortion services. This Reagan-appointed justice has twice in his career — once in 1992 and again in 2016 — supplied a fifth vote to reject challenges to basic abortion rights. To anti-abortion activists (and to other cultural conservatives angry at his leading role in providing constitutional protection for same-sex marriage rights) he has become the living symbol of Republican judicial backstabbing.

SNIP

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Kennedy, 80, did NOT retire today. (Original Post) pnwmom Jun 2017 OP
That would have made today a very bad day. madaboutharry Jun 2017 #1
Hang On Kennedy Hang On colsohlibgal Jun 2017 #2
Thank God! Nt Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #3

madaboutharry

(40,212 posts)
1. That would have made today a very bad day.
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 04:11 PM
Jun 2017

I still have whiplash from the ease at which Mitch McConnell stole a Supreme Court seat.

colsohlibgal

(5,275 posts)
2. Hang On Kennedy Hang On
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 04:51 PM
Jun 2017

For starters least 18 or so months.....If the democrats cannot win back congress after 2 years of Chitolini God help us.

I was heartened by what Tom Perez said in his Rolling Stone interview, he clearly stated he was going to go back to Howard Dean's 50 state strategy.

We are at one big crossroad and what happens in 2018 will tell a lot about whether we continue as a real functioning democracy.

So stay well and stick around all non wingnut Supremes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justice Kennedy, 80, did ...