and countless others....
She supported Trump during the election...
She's been exposed several times....her Koolaid runs out pretty fast..

She started tweeting against him from the time he first started to run.

During Evan McMullin's short run, she supported him. But after DT won the primary, she strongly supported Hillary.

and why is she hiding her support for Trump?

I googled and couldn't find any evidence of this.

Not sure if google is broken or something in your part of the world..

There are several DU threads already on this as well...

Your credibility is sinking fast.

You probably would have to cite a pro-Trump site, and that's what's holding you back.

in a fake...the threads are all over DU on her exposure...even Stevie Wonder can find them
It's like talking to a Trump supporter, and showing them all the evidence on how bad Trump is, and they still believe that he is the greatest thing since sliced bread...

Sorry, but I"m not going to go swimming in the pro-Trump swamp where you obviously are finding your theories.

and you still refuse to look at them..

google Louise Mensch is a fake or something along those lines..

for you to find the link you're referring to.

And she certainly isn't hiding her political views.

That seems like the kind of confidently made statement for which there is some sort of proof... i'm sure i'm not alone in my desire that you share it.

She is a conservative, and I disagree with her on many, many things, but she legitimately loathes Trump and all he stands for. And has for a long time.

Put up or shut up.

I'm interested and like that she says who she is. Also, we can agree on patriotism over party and single payer. PLus, from the day she brought the 'British Dossier' to the attention of not only us but the intelligence communities, I have been reading what she has to say. She has detractors, but I say to each their own. I won't try to convince them and they won't me.

She runs a glorified twitter gossip and conspiracy theory column.

And let's not forget she was a columnist for the Sun, one of the sleaziest papers in the world.

She has hated on DT in any venue she's ever written in, including Heat Street. She is a conservative so she's written in conservative outlets. But she's an ally on DT and that's all I care about at the moment.

You, for some reason, think it's important to attack a Never Trumper who is trying to rally other conservatives to the anti-Trump side. I don't get it.

Sbe started out that way to rope people in then started to slowly pull the wool over everyone's eyes. I wrote her off after a week or so.

GOP primary. She couldn't stand him and was hoping someone like Jeb Bush would win.

And far too many have fallen for her distractions.

I dont have to agree with or approve of, everything someone says to find value in what they say.
for now, I find her postings useful.

Why dismiss anyone with possible Trump info at this point? She obviously has some connections.

If not, then she is clearly mentally ill. Perhaps both.

I know what I'm talking about.

I still read her feed daily, but with an open mind.

Link to tweet

usually mean they got nothing but nothing, so they attack the journalist on a personal level. She won't be intimidated by their bullshit attacks.

I like her retweets too:

its bull or not, it gets at Republicans and apparently Trump. That's a positive for me. Some of the hysterical anti mensch posters here would want to have a good look at themselves, especially at their uber purity indignation. As you said, she doesn't hide who she is, and at the very least she has entertainment value for me.K

But even the MSM can get things wrong, for example, the NY Times last fall.

And she doesn't hide her conservatism -- and I like that about her. I appreciate all the conservatives who were Never Trumpers and didn't change their minds after the election.

There is an entire troll propaganda army attacking her for that. Like a large orchestra of air guitars, nothing but nothing, so they just make shit up and throw it at her.

Her history more than speaks for itself. There is a long record of terrible statements and actions that are verifiably real.

So she can fuck right off with that.

if you read her tweets.

Including the same ones currently in the process of trying to privatize it. If you say you're against the NHS in Britain it's immediate political suicide.

Seriously though, why are you defending this right winger? Because she posts a lot of anti-Trump stuff on Twitter, suddenly she's an ally who we're supposed to stand up for? She's openly conservative and a self-described Republican.

not an employee of hers. Earlier he had said that he was going to be too busy from now on, and was going to drop off twitter. She and others said goodbye.

Big deal.

That isn't what that twitter exchange is about at all -- I even went to twitter and read the whole exchange. Like you said, it's just one of her "twitter friends" saying they are dropping off of twitter for a bit. WE all have friends who do that sometimes.

Louise has put in countless hours of research, she has sought out advice from respected experts from the law, technology and intelligence communities (and unlike some, she has shared her data/work product). For these reasons, I believe Louise is sincere.

Louise's inability to moderate her behavior is problematic. Her inability to take or ignore criticism leads to twitter feuds galore, ad-hominem attacks and accusations which her devotees rush to take part in (ex N. Jamali).She does nothing to dissuade them. Yes, Louise is the victim of a concerted campaign to discredit her (some of the people attacking her are disinfo agents).

Louise's black or white absolutism leads her to knee-jerkingly label people as enemies or traitors and "Team Trump"- former CIA deputy director Mike Morrell, a staunch anti-Trumper was labeled this after praising the Syria missle attack. His praise was consistent with his views re Syria going back at least three years (The man once praised Hil. Clinton's compassion in an interview with Ch. Rose, for god's sake).All this makes it difficult for me to trust Louise's judgement.
I believe Louise does have sources. I believe, that she believes her sources are who they say they are. Again, I believe she is sincere.
It is Louise's lack of judgement, that makes it extremely difficult for me to trust her sources.Jamali was a source,now he's Team Treason.

That being said, I don't mind our allies being flawed, as long as they strongly oppose DT, as she clearly does.

Hope, inspiration, determination, we need it all.

She comes off like an idiot there.

TV news outlets here are not exactly clamoring to have her on their shows

Crap like this:

Sources further say that the Supreme Court notified Mr. Trump that the formal process of a case of impeachment against him was begun, before he departed the country on Air Force One. The notification was given, as part of the formal process of the matter, in order that Mr. Trump knew he was not able to use his powers of pardon against other suspects in Trump-Russia cases. Sources have confirmed that the Marshal of the Supreme Court spoke to Mr. Trump.

Does that bother you at all?

and her putting Country over Party.

I do not need others to like her... I just do all by myself.

I also started following her immediately after election because she was one of the few voices taking Trump/Russia seriously and dedicating her time and energy to uncovering info from all kinds of angles.

Go Louise! Go Louise!

So many examples to pick from to illustrate my point, but I'll go with this tweet about Bernie Sanders...

Link to tweet

was perplexing.

And as she is a conservative and does not realize what's going on in our party she reached that conclusion at that moment.

The world is perplexing. So anyone who posts nonsense every time she confronts a perplexing situation is not somebody credible.

Link to tweet

I disagree with Bernie on that point, but calling him a Russian agent is simply insane.

I know what you mean and it was just a quick observation she made. It is not her most important point and she is more interested in Trump's part and the current misadministration treasonous acts.

She's full of shit. People need to stop falling for her conspiracy theory bullshit.

More power to her, and to John Schindler, and to any other conservative among the opposition.

The fact that they have such a following points to the utter lack of critical thinking skills on the part of their followers. It discredits all of us as a bunch of gullible idiots. Same as the 9/11 conspiracy theorists did.

All while trashing Mensch. I don't have to like her to understand what she is doing is helping us. It helps to keep the narrative going.

It's like people haven't the slightest clue how Benghazi actually hurt us. Keeping the narrative alive for months on end is hugely beneficial. That means all hands on deck and the use of all willing to help.

she was out there screaming that narrative. And she's never stopped. Good for her.

Hurt her if she runs for office and is looking at the wrong end of an oppo file. She is obviously very smart and very capable, but Twitter never forgets.

I don't put any of this in terms of Mensch. If she runs for office I hope she gets clobbered. I could care less about her outside of her assistance in pushing this narrative.

Is such a completely disreputable wackaloon that I am instantly suspicious of the motives of anyone that would come here to defend her. When it comes to her drivel I'd sooner trust a story that a crackhead told me about why he needed to borrow 20 bucks. Same level of reliability.

..uh..'HIPPA'







[IMG][/IMG]



as someone said on twitter, "It's almost like she's not American and doesn't know what she's talking about."

for mental health issues..

I started reading about her and thought she was being unfairly targeted. Then I kept reading some more and then found a few videos of her PRAISING Trump over and over.

I also saw a video of her being interviewed by the BBC I think, and she showed what a nutcase she is. She was mocked and laughed at by the host and guests when the connection ended.

Don't think she's a plant.....she's just insane. Something's very wrong with her.

after reviewing those videos of her praising Trump...

Do not feel like looking for the Tweet, but she recently posted something that I recall as Putin is not the main issue, the Russians are, Putin is the Russian leader, so that makes him the focus. Her friend 20 committees is the same way, though he is far more of an expert on Russia, having fought them for his working life.

I thought she deleted it. She didn't. So if there's any doubt about that screenshot..

it's real.

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

are gems...