General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump Justice Department's Aversion to Class Actions Will Have Wide Impact
National Law Journal
Trump Justice Department's Aversion to Class Actions Will Have Wide Impact
The recent switch by the Trump administrations U.S. Justice Department from opposing to defending bans on class actions in workplace arbitration agreements will have consequences beyond a trio of challenges the U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear this fall.he recent switch by the Trump administrations U.S. Justice Department from opposing to defending bans on class actions in workplace arbitration agreements will have consequences beyond a trio of challenges the U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear this fall.
On June 16, acting solicitor general Jeffrey Wall informed the justices that the Justice Department was reversing its position in a key labor case, National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil, which tests employee arbitration agreements. The government said it would no longer support the NLRBs position that arbitration agreements barring class actions violate federal labor law.
Less than three weeks later, on July 3, the Justice Department relied on that reversal in the high court to justify abandoning its support for a class action provision in the U.S. Labor departments so-called fiduciary rule. Also in that same period of one month, the Justice Department allowed a June 2 deadline to lapse for its appeal of a temporary injunction against a nursing home rule that banned mandatory arbitration agreements.
The two reversals and the lapsed appeal signal a broadening effort by the Trump administration to prohibit or restrict class actions through litigation or regulation.
The Justice Department continues to defend the fiduciary rule, Obama-era regulations that raised standards for financial advisers, even as the Labor Department moves to revise provisions in the rule. Theres only one part of the rule the Trump Justice Department wont now support in court: a class action provision. In its July 3 filing in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the Justice Department, represented by Deputy Assistant Attorney General Hashim Mooppan, urged the court to strike down a provision restricting class action waivers in arbitration clauses.
The restriction on class action waivers is a condition on financial advisers who want to qualify for the fiduciary rules best interest contract exemption, or BIC. If they qualify, those advisers are exempt from certain prohibited transaction provisions in federal retirement laws. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a lead plaintiff in the case, has argued the condition violates the Federal Arbitration Act, or FAA. The Justice Department now agrees.
Given the governments position in Murphy Oil, the government is no longer defending the BIC Exemptions condition restricting class-litigation waivers insofar as it applies to arbitration agreements, Justice Department lawyers wrote in their brief. The government's legal team said the condition is a discriminatory obstacle to arbitration that cannot be harmonized with the FAA and {AT&T Mobility v.} Concepcion under the interpretation of those authorities adopted by the government in Murphy Oil.
The governments flipped position in Murphy Oil complicates things a lot, said Deepak Gupta of Washingtons Gupta Wessler, who has supported the provisions of the best interest contract exemption on behalf of the American Association of Justice. Gupta on Thursday filed an amicus brief for the group.
On June 16, acting solicitor general Jeffrey Wall informed the justices that the Justice Department was reversing its position in a key labor case, National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil, which tests employee arbitration agreements. The government said it would no longer support the NLRBs position that arbitration agreements barring class actions violate federal labor law. Less than three weeks later, on July 3, the Justice Department relied on that reversal in the high court to justify abandoning its support for a class action provision in the U.S. Labor departments so-called fiduciary rule. Also in that same period of one month, the Justice Department allowed a June 2 deadline to lapse for its appeal of a temporary injunction against a nursing home rule that banned mandatory arbitration agreements. The two reversals and the lapsed appeal signal a broadening effort by the Trump administration to prohibit or restrict class actions through litigation or regulation. The Justice Department continues to defend the fiduciary rule, Obama-era regulations that raised standards for financial advisers, even as the Labor Department moves to revise provisions in the rule.
Theres only one part of the rule the Trump Justice Department wont now support in court: a class action provision. In its July 3 filing in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the Justice Department, represented by Deputy Assistant Attorney General Hashim Mooppan, urged the court to strike down a provision restricting class action waivers in arbitration clauses. The restriction on class action waivers is a condition on financial advisers who want to qualify for the fiduciary rules best interest contract exemption, or BIC. If they qualify, those advisers are exempt from certain prohibited transaction provisions in federal retirement laws. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a lead plaintiff in the case, has argued the condition violates the Federal Arbitration Act, or FAA. The Justice Department now agrees.
Given the governments position in Murphy Oil, the government is no longer defending the BIC Exemptions condition restricting class-litigation waivers insofar as it applies to arbitration agreements, Justice Department lawyers wrote in their brief. The government's legal team said the condition is a discriminatory obstacle to arbitration that cannot be harmonized with the FAA and {AT&T Mobility v.} Concepcion under the interpretation of those authorities adopted by the government in Murphy Oil.
The governments flipped position in Murphy Oil complicates things a lot, said Deepak Gupta of Washingtons Gupta Wessler, who has supported the provisions of the best interest contract exemption on behalf of the American Association of Justice. Gupta on Thursday filed an amicus brief for the group.
More: (unfortunately, one needs sign up f/ 5 articles/month)
http://m.nationallawjournal.com/#/article/1202792369035?kw=The%20Trump%20Justice%20Department%27s%20Aversion%20to%20Class%20Actions%20Will%20Have%20Wide%20Impact&_almReferrer=