General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsliberal N proud
(60,340 posts)spanone
(135,863 posts)SalviaBlue
(2,918 posts)and thank you Thom Hartmann!
Iggo
(47,564 posts)MyOwnPeace
(16,937 posts)ain't that socialism?
How else am I supposed to support those against my own self-interest?
tblue37
(65,483 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)example #1
Healthcare in Switzerland
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Switzerland
Response to snooper2 (Reply #7)
LittleGirl This message was self-deleted by its author.
onit2day
(1,201 posts)It becomes self evident. Medicare operates at 3% overhead and if everyone had it it would cover dental vision hearing and psy. Nothing is perfict but single payer is the next best thing from it.
Mountain Mule
(1,002 posts)From your link to Wiki: Swiss are required to purchase basic health insurance, which covers a range of treatments detailed in the Swiss Federal Law on Health Insurance... It is therefore the same throughout the country and avoids double standards in healthcare. *** Insurers are required to offer this basic insurance to everyone***, regardless of age or medical condition. ***They are not allowed to make a profit off this basic insurance***, but can on supplemental plans.
The insured person pays the insurance premium for the basic plan up to 8% of their personal income. If a premium is higher than this, ***the government gives the insured person a cash subsidy to pay for any additional premium***.
robbob
(3,538 posts)If you are poor or not earning very much money essentially you are paying nothing and are still fully covered for medical care and regular check ups with your doctor. If you are middle-class you might be paying 1 or 2 thousand a year. If you are extremely wealthy (in the multi millionnaire class), you might be paying 10,000 or more to help support the healthcare system.
I have been a student, an unemployed person, a working musician, and a successful computer programmer and at all times my health care needs were fully covered.
I am semi retired now and last year I had a bit of a scare with some chest pain's and shortness of breath. I was admitted to emergency in Ottawa, spent the night there and had multiple tests done at that time which didn't show any problems. Total cost for my nights stay in the hospital? Zero.
Because of the nature of my complaint I was immediately scheduled for multiple tests to determine the health of my heart. Over the next month I had three test done and met with the cardiologist. Thank God nothing was wrong, it appears that it was just a stress related anomaly.
Total cost to me for these tests and the meeting with a specialist? Absolutely nothing. A small minor health care issue that could've easily bankrupted an uninsured American was taken care of professionally, quickly, and for free. The state of health care in your country is a disgrace and a joke. It's time for America to join the rest of the free world in providing healthcare to ALL its citizens.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Makes the greedy greedier.
B Stieg
(2,410 posts)Never saw a bill for any medical care over the two years my family lived there on my "student" visa (I was playing junior hockey).
And my mom, brother and I weren't even "landed immigrants."
luvtheGWN
(1,336 posts)pay the insurance companies directly, with no shopping around for the lowest premiums, no co-pays, no deductibles, I assume.
We folks up here in the GWN pay through our taxes, for medical coverage -- doctor visits, specialist visits, surgeries (but not for medically unnecessary surgeries such as plastics). Most employers provide supplemental health benefits (vision, dental, drugs, physical therapy etc.) as part of the employment package for full-time employees. Us retirees (depending on the company) may or may not have the same benefits package, and if not, many of us pay for supplemental out of our own pockets (but many do not). Our health insurance companies are extremely "healthy" and in fact some have even bought up American companies (SunLife purchased John Hancock several years ago, for example). So the pols who issue the dire warning that insurance companies will go out of business if universal health insurance is brought in are talking through their hats. And oh yes, pharma companies are restricted in their advertising here. An ad for Cialis or Viagra may show up on TV or in magazines, but you'd never know from the ad exactly what either of them are for. It's quite funny, actually -- a man and a woman in separate bathtubs on a beach -- WTF!!!!!!!!
One quibble I have is that our medicare for all does not cover dental, and since our entire gastroenterology system starts in the mouth, I think it's a big mistake not to cover that part of our anatomy.
The GOP likes to spread many lies about our healthcare system, and never differentiates between waiting lists for elective or non-life-threatening conditions and those -- heart, stroke, cancer, and other life-threatening conditions -- where you automatically go to the head of the line. Gee, could that be why we Canucks can expect to live longer than Americans (according to statistics)?
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Welcome to the internet.
progressoid
(49,996 posts)Trial_By_Fire
(624 posts)from Goddard College...
snooper2
(30,151 posts)no shit
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Not factual. And he's not a Dr.
Ireland has a two tier system with public and private payers - which help to relieve costs on the government for the rest of the population.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_the_Republic_of_Ireland
In Israel, in the area of medications for serious illnesses, private insurance companies give access to a wider range of than the official "basket of medications", as the Israeli government is not financially capable of covering all medications.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Israel#Private_healthcare
Just because it confirms your bias doesn't make it true. We have facts on our side, so we don't need alternative facts.
onit2day
(1,201 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)The meme said "No other country in the developed world," not "many other countries in the developed world, such a Germany..."
Read it again. I'm not cherry picking, I'm just pointing out incorrect generalizations.
As I said - we're supposed to be the party of facts, respecting data. Why not just use facts?
And Thom Hartmann isn't a doctor, either.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Table E1, page iv: https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/for-profit-hospitals-and-insurers-in-universal-health-care-countries.pdf
Dr. Thom needs a brain transplant.
Mme. Defarge
(8,040 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)The other part of this is our for-profit higher education system.
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)Truth
Timmygoat
(779 posts)I am originally from the UK, have lived in other European countries, never seen anyone worried about the cost of health care, it is either -no cost, or a small fraction of the cost, different European countries have slightly different approaches, but they are all pretty good. Canada is pretty good too. I was astonished when I first learned about the cost of US healthcare, and that people make a profit from illness. The cost of administration is all that happens in many country, the doctors are paid a good salary but do not expect massive salaries like in the US.
I think stockholders in the large insurance companies are like vultures picking the bones of the sick.
BigmanPigman
(51,626 posts)LakeArenal
(28,837 posts)Bromwell
(123 posts)Most Americans don't even question it. Its just "the way it is".
mcar
(42,372 posts)This is absolutely correct. Profit has no business in healthcare.
Mickju
(1,805 posts)benld74
(9,909 posts)Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)not be near each other. Like in a sentence.
GeorgeGist
(25,322 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)IronLionZion
(45,516 posts)I'd like to get universal medicare for all too but posting complete BS on an image isn't going to get it for us.
It's going to take a bit more effort. Getting people to vote, winning elections, the ramming it through with a simple majority because we no longer need 60 votes to pass controversial legislation. And a Dem president to sign it into law. And some good messaging to get people to want it and understand why it's good for our country
Here's a good bill to start with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_National_Health_Care_Act
southerncrone
(5,506 posts)dsc
(52,166 posts)Insurance companies are certainly a part of the reason we pay more. But we pay close to twice as much and insurance only takes about 25%. Hospitals are a big problem. Medical supply and drug companies are a big problem. Guns are also a big problem (one study said LA paid more for care of gun patients than it spent on its entire Medicaid program).
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)With the exception of Canada, for-profit private health insurance remains almost universally present in developed countries, including those with universal-access health care schemes, to deliver supplemental, elective, expedited, and/or alternative care, including Australia, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland, whose health-care outcomes are analyzed in this November 2015 Canadian study:
https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/for-profit-hospitals-and-insurers-in-universal-health-care-countries.pdf
That took a lot longer to explain than to find in google. Maybe Dr. Thom needs to brush up in Facebookology?
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)"Extras cover." It gets you slightly more comfortable treatment and adds things like dental, wellness treatment, etc. Its cost is modest (maybe AUD 200/month for a family), and is often included in people's pay packets as a recruiting tool.
But it's a relatively small segment of the market compared to primary care, in which insurance companies have nearly no impact.
Stuart G
(38,439 posts)MrModerate
(9,753 posts)Whose profession is threatened, but whose work adds no value and keeps the blood flowing for the ghouls.
They'll need to be retrained to useful work when the insurance companies are forced out of healthcare funding.