General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe 'Did Trump's Campaign Collude' Debate Is Over. The Only Question Now Is How Much.
The Did Trumps Campaign Collude Debate Is Over. The Only Question Now Is How Much.
By Jonathan Chait
July 11, 2017
1:30 pm
Not long ago, it was fashionable for pundits to assert there was no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. That line was shaky at the time, and has been quickly blown to smithereens. We have gone from evidence of collusion to proof, with emails establishing the campaigns clear interest in accepting Moscows help to win the election.
This is a very simple test of the common English understanding of the term collusion. Your campaign is told that Russia wants to help you win the election. (This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its governments support for Mr. Trump.) If you refuse to take the meeting, or perhaps take it only to angrily tell your interlocutor you want no part of the project, then it isnt collusion. If you take the meeting on the proposed terms, you are colluding. If somehow the information on offer turned out to have no value, and the contacts went no farther, then the meeting was ineffectual collusion. But Donald Trump Jr.s response clearly indicates that he accepted the meeting in order to collude. (If its what you say I love it.)
This is the scope of the unresolved question now. How much collusion happened?
Previous news reports have established other potential avenues for collusion. There is The Wall Street Journal reporting from June, which shows both a Republican staffer identifying himself as working for Michael Flynn trying to acquire stolen Democratic emails from Russia, and Russians working to get stolen emails to Flynn. There is also the Washington Post report from May revealing that Jared Kushner tried to establish a secret communications channel with Russia during the transition.
The revelatory emails suggest other possible channels of collusion. One email from Goldstone states, I can send this info to your father via Rhona presumably Rhona Graff, Donald Trumps personal assistant thereby implying that President Trump may have received the information himself, and not merely through his aides. (Also, Rhona should probably hire a lawyer, if she hasnt already.) Its also noteworthy that Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner attended the meeting with a lawyer Trump Jr. identified as a Russian government attorney that was specifically dedicated to collusion.
more
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/07/trump-campaign-colluded-the-only-question-now-is-how-much.html
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)underpants
(182,823 posts)flotsam
(3,268 posts)...there is no "how much"...