General Discussion

FormerOstrich

(2,702 posts) Sat Jul 29, 2017, 03:51 PM Jul 2017

Ivanka Trumps (sic) has private lunch with UN chief Guterres

I came to DU to read comments on this from my fellow DUers. I was surprised I couldn't find where anyone had posted it. I apologize if it was posted and I didn't see it.

President Donald Trump’s daughter Ivanka had a private lunch Friday with Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, and the White House said the U.N. chief invited her to follow up on her launch of a fund to help women entrepreneurs access capital.
.....
Kim said at the time that the fund had raised more than $325 million so far for projects.....
...
The fund grew out of conversations between Ivanka Trump and Kim early in Trump’s administration. The president announced a $50 million contribution from the United States at the launch.

Read it all here: Ivanaka

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ivanka Trumps (sic) has private lunch with UN chief Guterres (Original Post) FormerOstrich Jul 2017 OP

Is this about setting up another republican-russian money laundry? Achilleaze Jul 2017 #1

yo no s FormerOstrich Jul 2017 #2

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)

1. Is this about setting up another republican-russian money laundry?

Reply to FormerOstrich (Original post)

Sat Jul 29, 2017, 03:56 PM

Jul 2017

Seems that's the big republican economic scheme - to keep laundering filthy drug and crime money, and then funneling a fat stream of it into screwing over democracy.

I. Vanka impresses me as a slick operator. I trust her about as much as I trust her ignoble daddy, the lying, cheating, bullying republican Draft-Dodger-in-Chief.

FormerOstrich

(2,702 posts)

2. yo no s

Reply to Achilleaze (Reply #1)

Sat Jul 29, 2017, 05:37 PM

Jul 2017

I wondered, too. I am not very good at understanding all the implications of such. But I am good at sensing when there is something with implications.

I don't think I like what little I know of this and am very surprised there isn't more being said about it. I think it seem much more underhandedly than her sitting in at the G20.

Reply to this discussion