General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCourt allows states to join Obama-initiated appeal of ruling against funding low income insurers
Andrew S. Ginsburg? @GinsburgJobsCourt Ruling Throws A Wrench In Trump's Obamacare Sabotage Plan
States have standing to fight a lawsuit threatening billions in funding for health insurers, an appeals court said
____President Barack Obama requested that Congress explicitly authorize the spending required to reimburse insurers with low-income customers, but Congress denied him. The Obama administration paid out the money anyway.
This prompted House Republicans, led by then-Speaker John Boehner (Ohio), to sue Obama, arguing that he repaid insurers unlawfully. A federal judge last year ruled in the House GOPs favor, but allowed the government to continue paying insurers while Obamas appeal was underway.
That appeal carried over into Trumps presidency, making his administration the defendant in a lawsuit filed by his own party ― and giving him the power to unilaterally end the payments to insurance companies and send the exchanges into a tailspin.
The Trump administration and House Republicans sought and received several delays from the appeals court this year, arguing in part that the repeal and replace effort on Capitol Hill ― now stalled ― could make the case irrelevant.
But at any time, Trump could drop the appeal or simply order the Treasury to end the payments.
In its ruling Tuesday, the court agreed state officials had standing to join the appeal. Further court proceedings will remain on hold, the appellate judges ruled...
read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/court-trump-obamacare-sabotage_us_598128c6e4b09d24e993d470?bjw
Gothmog
(145,345 posts)This gives these states standing to sue on the insurance subsidies
bigtree
(85,999 posts)...here we are.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Sadly, I expect the GOP Congress will succeed in this in the long run. It will go all the way to SCOTUS and the way the Constitution is set up the House has the power of the purse and only they can allocate funding for anything.
History is littered with programs that have existed in law and on paper but either were poorly funded so they barely existed or were not funded at all, so while they existed in theory in practice they didn't.
The executive cannot force the legislative branch to pass a law or a portion of a law. That would be a huge breach of the balance of power.
Likewise the executive cannot just allocate and spend money not authorized by Congress. Once again to do so would be a huge break on the balance of power.
So that is the whole problem with any system that relies on Congress to properly fund it- you lose control of the House and you can't make sure they fund it properly.
The first step to fixing this is CONTROL of both houses. Until we have that it's a problem. The second step is changing the law so funding isn't dependent upon the whims of Congress.