General Discussion

uppityperson

(115,677 posts) Fri Jul 13, 2012, 09:07 PM Jul 2012

Zimmy evidence photos. I don't see the black eyes or any blood on him. How could he have shot

Trayvon, especially if Zimmy was underneath Trayvon, without getting any blood on himself? And the jacket looks pretty clean for having been on the bottom of a fight.

What am I missing?

http://www.wptv.com/gallery/news/news_photo_gallery/george-zimmerman-trayvon-martin-evidence-photos

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Zimmy evidence photos. I don't see the black eyes or any blood on him. How could he have shot (Original Post) uppityperson Jul 2012 OP

Nose surely doesn't look injured FiveGoodMen Jul 2012 #1

The blood wounds appear to be to the back of his head. LACarMan Jul 2012 #2

Well.... pre-black eye bruising there is swelling happening almost immediately... FarPoint Jul 2012 #3

These are the "evidence" photos, evidence of his black eyes. I don't see any such thing there which uppityperson Jul 2012 #6

By reading this post, you are missing the opportunity to donate russspeakeasy Jul 2012 #4

The poor baby... I wonder how these compare to Martin's autopsy photos n/t arcane1 Jul 2012 #5

No blood or grass stains brush Jul 2012 #7

That is what I am coming up with also. It doesn't make sense, these being evidence of what he's uppityperson Jul 2012 #8

Hmm maybe he should have driven away and not gone out of his car to chase him gollygee Jul 2012 #9

I very much agree. Just found these "evidence photos" and find them odd uppityperson Jul 2012 #11

Cops disagreed on Zimmy's "broken" nose...Beware, picture of shot sweatshirt @ link. uppityperson Jul 2012 #10

Is it normal for this much of the evidence to be released? Even in a high profile case? joshcryer Jul 2012 #12

Did you hear he asked for another new judge? He doesn't think he will get a fair trial with the jillan Jul 2012 #13

Sure don't look like Meiko Jul 2012 #14

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)

1. Nose surely doesn't look injured

Reply to uppityperson (Original post)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 09:15 PM

Jul 2012

Blood on head was nowhere to be found on those surveillance-cam tapes from the police station.

Not buying any of it.

LACarMan

(45 posts)

2. The blood wounds appear to be to the back of his head.

Reply to uppityperson (Original post)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 09:25 PM

Jul 2012

I had a fall a few months ago where I went face down. There was blood on my face and some fell to the front of my shirt. Went to the ER the next day on the advice of my wife and was told I would most likely develop a black eye. Took a day or two, but the eye was shut for another three. Black eyes don't happen right away.

FarPoint

(12,409 posts)

3. Well.... pre-black eye bruising there is swelling happening almost immediately...

Reply to LACarMan (Reply #2)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 09:33 PM

Jul 2012

Skin turns reddish/blushing as well...it's a trauma response. I don't see any evidence of that either....so I don't believe for one nano-second Zimmy sustained the alleged injuries he has conveniently claims.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)

6. These are the "evidence" photos, evidence of his black eyes. I don't see any such thing there which

Reply to LACarMan (Reply #2)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 10:08 PM

Jul 2012

is odd since this is supposed to be the photo evidence.

How about having no blood on his shirt, since he was supposed to be under Tray when he shot him? I don't see any blood there. And the back of his coat is supposed to be stained from laying on his back getting his head bashed in.

Maybe my eyes are getting bad?

russspeakeasy

(6,539 posts)

4. By reading this post, you are missing the opportunity to donate

Reply to uppityperson (Original post)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 09:40 PM

Jul 2012

to the killers defense fund and that is all you are missing.

arcane1

(38,613 posts)

5. The poor baby... I wonder how these compare to Martin's autopsy photos n/t

Reply to uppityperson (Original post)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 10:01 PM

Jul 2012

brush

(53,786 posts)

7. No blood or grass stains

Reply to uppityperson (Original post)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 10:16 PM

Jul 2012

Where are the blood and grass stains on his clothes? The front of his jacket and his shirt have no blood on them. Seems like there would be blood if Martin was on top of him when he shot him. And the back of his jacket and jeans have not a lick of grass stains or dirt on them at all from being pinned down on the ground and punched by Martin. zimmerman is a lying sack of you know what and it will come out in court. How will he explain how clean his clothes were? From the look of the photos it looks like either he was the one on top or he was never on the ground at all.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)

8. That is what I am coming up with also. It doesn't make sense, these being evidence of what he's

Reply to brush (Reply #7)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 10:17 PM

Jul 2012

claiming. All I can see is a couple scratches on the back of his head. Hands look fine, no scratches or signs of a fight. Clothing is clean and dry. Eyes not black.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)

9. Hmm maybe he should have driven away and not gone out of his car to chase him

Reply to uppityperson (Original post)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 10:18 PM

Jul 2012

as the dispatcher told him. That would have been a good idea.

I don't know if Trayvon Martin fought back at some point or not, but regardless, none of this would have happened if this idiot hadn't made stupid racist assumptions, followed him, gotten out of his car, and gone after him. He owns whatever happened after that.