Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NRaleighLiberal

(60,015 posts)
Mon Aug 14, 2017, 11:55 PM Aug 2017

Slate "Trump Reportedly Thought On Many Sides Statement Was Fine...

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/08/14/trump_reportedly_thought_first_charlottesville_statement_was_fine_resisted.html

...Resisted Second Condemning White Nationalists"

By Elliot Hannon

On Saturday, the President of the United States condemned the violence “on many sides” in Charlottesville as white supremacists literally marched through the streets and killed an opposing protester. On Sunday, sensing that people weren’t particularly happy with his relativism on the deadly incident, White House spokespeople fanned out on the Sunday talk shows to sharpen the president’s tepid response. The White House also released an anonymously sourced statement, at last, specifically naming white supremacist hate groups as an actual, explicit problem. “The President said very strongly in his statement yesterday that he condemns all forms of violence, bigotry, and hatred. Of course that includes white supremacists, KKK, neo-Nazi and all extremist groups,” the statement read. Yes, of course.

With the president's response still lacking, and far-right white nationalist groups declaring Trump’s noncondemnation condemnation a victory, the White House hastily scheduled a press conference Monday to try to get it right on the third try. The only thing is: Trump didn’t want to. He thought he had already nailed it the first time. That’s according to the Associated Press, which spoke to aides about the president’s meandering response.

Loath to appear to be admitting a mistake, Trump was reluctant to adjust his remarks. The president had indicated to advisers before his initial statement Saturday that he wanted to stress a need for law and order, which he did. He later expressed anger to those close to him about what he perceived as the media’s unfair assessment of his remarks, believing he had effectively denounced all forms of bigotry, according to outside advisers and White House officials.

Several of Trump’s senior advisers, including new chief of staff John Kelly, had urged him to make a more specific condemnation, warning that the negative story would not go away and that the rising tide of criticism from fellow Republicans on Capitol Hill could endanger his legislative agenda, according to two White House officials.

So let’s be clear the president of the United States didn’t want or believe he needed to make his second statement actually condemning white supremacists Monday. From the AP’s version of events, Donald Trump does not see what he did wrong the first time and one of the ways his chief of staff tried to convince him to denounce the KKK was to make clear to him that going soft on unbridled bigotry was bad politically for him. Kelly played to the president’s profound selfishness in reminding Trump that he personally would lose something—his “agenda” (whatever that is)—if he didn’t do more to condemn the historical and ongoing scourge of white supremacist violence and intimidation.

After all of that, the president of the United States sauntered up to the podium at the White House on Monday and ticked off his administration’s so-called accomplishments on the economy, trade, and job creation. “As I said on Saturday," Trump said, still dragging his feet, as he got around to Charlottesville again. “Racism is evil,” Trump said. “And those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the K.K.K., neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans.”

Made additional remarks on Charlottesville and realize once again that the #Fake News Media will never be satisfied...truly bad people!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 14, 2017

Now, one more time—like you mean it.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Slate "Trump Reportedly Thought On Many Sides Statement Was Fine... (Original Post) NRaleighLiberal Aug 2017 OP
K&R for visibility. nt tblue37 Aug 2017 #1
The article states there was a leak ........... need to hunt that leaker down Angry Dragon Aug 2017 #2
He believes his own PR. Limited intellectual capacity irisblue Aug 2017 #3
Certainly confirms some of our suspicions here! Docreed2003 Aug 2017 #4
Interesting theory...nt ecstatic Aug 2017 #5
I assumed this was obvious Awsi Dooger Aug 2017 #6

Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)
2. The article states there was a leak ........... need to hunt that leaker down
Tue Aug 15, 2017, 12:03 AM
Aug 2017

and bring Fire and Fury like they have never seen before

irisblue

(32,980 posts)
3. He believes his own PR. Limited intellectual capacity
Tue Aug 15, 2017, 12:08 AM
Aug 2017

He appears to have limited, very limited ability to engage in critical & independent thought outside of real estate & self promotion.

Docreed2003

(16,862 posts)
4. Certainly confirms some of our suspicions here!
Tue Aug 15, 2017, 12:15 AM
Aug 2017

But why the leak to suggest that Trump didn't want to get specific today in calling out these groups and that he thought what he said Sat was sufficient??

Two options:

1). A truly concerned individual who is appalled by Trumps actions and wanted to expose them leaked this story.

Ok, that's certainly possible. But I left Green Gables a long time ago and have become, perhaps, far too cynical. I think the second option is more likely.

2). This stinks of Bannon & his ilk. Bear with me here. After Saturday's remarks, many of these Nazi stooges were thrilled that Trump had not called them out. They felt like he was still in their corner. With today's press conference, that sense of support fell away. What better way to reassure that base than to leak a story that suggests "Hey, the *president didn't really want to say those things today". Wink wink nod nod...."He had to go out there and be specific so that we can further the *president's agenda. This is just a game to calm the press and a road bump towards MAGA"

Yeah, like I said, pretty damn cynical...but I do believe the second scenario is much more likely than the first!

 

Awsi Dooger

(14,565 posts)
6. I assumed this was obvious
Tue Aug 15, 2017, 12:39 AM
Aug 2017

Trump probably had an initial mentally prepared version that focused mostly on the opposing protesters and media. So he already softened it and was in angry disbelief that anyone dared suggest he move further.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Slate "Trump Reportedly T...