Stop patronizing them. Stop watching them. Shun those you know who do, especially shame those who watch religiously.

FUCK YOU Fox! FUCK the FUCK YOU!!

fake, I seriously thought he was ridiculous.

changed dentists, ask to change the channel in medical waiting rooms, express surprise that this drivel is on in someone's business. Each and every time. We all need to "Just say no."

airing FN in their waiting areas "change the channel to a news station." I have literally received applause on occasion.

Only once denied by an apologetic office manager who said doctor insisted. Yep, told him exactly why I was changing doctors.

Look at how quickly Trumpf's business councils fell apart after Frazier resigned.

C'mon peeps, make it go viral.

They have no conscience, and they feel no guilt.

The photographer did the right thing, but it will not shame or trouble the entity that is "Fox News".

You may have posted this in the wrong place.

They apparently stole his picture, so I don't consider them to have much of a conscience either

It would be better if they were not to suddenly switch over and condemn Trump. Because they would not only gain credibility with the moderate/right crowd (while losing the smaller demographic of the extreme right), but they could easily pivot to Pence as being the saviour as well as the House and Senate Republicans riding on this new wave of 'credibility'. The longer they ride the Trumptanic the better as it will be that much harder to swim back up to the surface when he finally crashes for good.

They'll abandon 45* the instant they think they can make a bigger profit backing Pence and other less radioactive repukes.

First I've heard it - perfect!

I do a lot of photography of amateur sporting events and it can be a lot of hard work with very little monetary reward. While it is just a hobby for me, I do know others who are trying to make a living shooting pictures

I would expect that if a well know news outlet or website asked to use my photos that I would be compensated. Just hoping he received adequate payment for his hard work.

In the post on KOS, the first photo says "attribution: Getty Images/Drew Angerer", all other photos where tweeted by Keegan Stephan, the photographer talked about in the story. I'm not a lawyer, and not particularly conversant on copyright law, but I suspect that once you tweet out one of your pics, it is pretty much public domain.

Mainly, those images are per article and run for duration, but cannot be reapportioned to other posts.

Often, you'll see a website post the same image of a person on multiple posts, this is because they might purchase an unlimited image package, where they buy the rights to use an image for a given period of time, as often as they want. They might buy a package of 20 images, 50, 100, or whatever.

Mind you, they never own the image, just the rights to use it.

I'm no expert either, but I do know that artists can go after you if you steal one of their pieces via download or screenshot just because you can, and use it on a blog, a flyer, an ad or commercial venture, etc. Artist acquaintances of mine struggle with this all the time when they post images to galleries, online shops and such, even with copyright watermarks.

==============

You retain your rights to any Content you submit, post or display on or through the Services. What’s yours is yours — you own your Content (and your photos and videos are part of the Content).

By submitting, posting or displaying Content on or through the Services, you grant us a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, reproduce, process, adapt, modify, publish, transmit, display and distribute such Content in any and all media or distribution methods (now known or later developed). This license authorizes us to make your Content available to the rest of the world and to let others do the same. You agree that this license includes the right for Twitter to provide, promote, and improve the Services and to make Content submitted to or through the Services available to other companies, organizations or individuals for the syndication, broadcast, distribution, promotion or publication of such Content on other media and services, subject to our terms and conditions for such Content use. Such additional uses by Twitter, or other companies, organizations or individuals, may be made with no compensation paid to you with respect to the Content that you submit, post, transmit or otherwise make available through the Services.

"We can use it however we want, other people can share it all over the world, and we can sublicense it out to other companies to use it, too... forever. Thanks for the free photo!"

============

I bet within the next few weeks however, they will have some post about businesses committing wage theft against workers

'Cuz this photog just won the "world's best" award for shutting (shuttering?) down the textbook definition of fake news.

I see what you did there!

their strips and denounce 45, then they can convince their idiot viewers that they are part of the solution. They will never be part of the solution. They helped create this monster, and they need to be made accountable.

Rec

BOMB! He dropped it!

Brilliant!

Good !

I'd say that about covers it.