Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marybourg

(12,633 posts)
Thu Aug 17, 2017, 11:35 PM Aug 2017

De-fund Jefferson Memorial?

I was at the gym a few minutes ago and the HGTV monitor was blank, so I reflexively glanced at the Faux News monitor and was startled to see the Rev. Al Sharpton. If the running banner at the bottom of the screen was to be believed, the Rev (whom I normally admire) was advocating for de-funding the Jefferson Memorial. I didn't get the rationale, since there's no sound unless you plug in earphones.

Has anybody heard about this?

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
De-fund Jefferson Memorial? (Original Post) marybourg Aug 2017 OP
Jefferson wasn't a traitor to his country. Beartracks Aug 2017 #1
Yeah, this is what I'm concerned about. marybourg Aug 2017 #3
There is no rationale. Ever since the word got out to trash Confederate memorials... TreasonousBastard Aug 2017 #2
It's a mistake to take as gospel anything Fox News has to say. oasis Aug 2017 #4
But in this case the Rev. Al seemed to be there in person, talking. marybourg Aug 2017 #5
Then I suspect he's only giving lip service to the idea. oasis Aug 2017 #14
The rationale? Jefferson was a monstrous hypocrite. Spider Jerusalem Aug 2017 #6
Still, not the same as being a traitor and taking up arms marybourg Aug 2017 #9
Recognising the reality instead of perpetuating a myth would probably help. Spider Jerusalem Aug 2017 #11
But it IS based on a lot of Jefferson's ideas. marybourg Aug 2017 #15
No it isn't? Spider Jerusalem Aug 2017 #16
If we took down all memorials of hypocrites LittleBlue Aug 2017 #10
King's hypocrisy has no bearing on his message though. Spider Jerusalem Aug 2017 #12
MLK was also anti gay wasn't he? nt MichMan Aug 2017 #21
Hypocrisy is not at all the point. Treason is. The Confederacy was TREASON. Should we have WinkyDink Aug 2017 #25
Lincoln also believed that blacks rusty fender Aug 2017 #22
Lincoln didn't own slaves, or father children by them after raping them? Spider Jerusalem Aug 2017 #23
The logic is the same as the old gay marriage argument conservatives used to promote. BannonsLiver Aug 2017 #7
This, perchance? MousePlayingDaffodil Aug 2017 #8
Probably. I only saw it for a second, and didn't hear it at all. marybourg Aug 2017 #13
If it were up to me . . . MousePlayingDaffodil Aug 2017 #17
I certainly think it's time we stopped expending our resources marybourg Aug 2017 #18
Except that, to my mind, a "monument" to a man . . . MousePlayingDaffodil Aug 2017 #19
As you point out about Washington, it's their ideas marybourg Aug 2017 #20
I see Al's point (and yours)... just not sure how far to go with it. InAbLuEsTaTe Aug 2017 #30
Get rid of all memorials. Snackshack Aug 2017 #24
Oh, please. WinkyDink Aug 2017 #26
Why get rid of them? Why not just renovate and rename them? InAbLuEsTaTe Aug 2017 #29
Fox News lies and distorts what Democrats octoberlib Aug 2017 #27
Yes if one person in the left says it, it must mean all on the left agree underpants Aug 2017 #28

Beartracks

(12,820 posts)
1. Jefferson wasn't a traitor to his country.
Thu Aug 17, 2017, 11:41 PM
Aug 2017

I hope Sharpton isn't advocating this just because Jefferson was a slave-owner. Don't prove Trump right, Al -- Trump claimed the left was gonna be coming for Washington and Jefferson after all the Confederate memorials were taken down.

============

marybourg

(12,633 posts)
3. Yeah, this is what I'm concerned about.
Thu Aug 17, 2017, 11:48 PM
Aug 2017

He's playing right into their hands. I don't remember him ever doing anything like this before.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
2. There is no rationale. Ever since the word got out to trash Confederate memorials...
Thu Aug 17, 2017, 11:42 PM
Aug 2017

it became the new thing to trash any historical figure involved with slavery.

I'm hoping the whole thing blows over sooner rather than later.

oasis

(49,395 posts)
4. It's a mistake to take as gospel anything Fox News has to say.
Thu Aug 17, 2017, 11:49 PM
Aug 2017

What did the "running banner" have to say about Hillary Clinton during her presidential run?

oasis

(49,395 posts)
14. Then I suspect he's only giving lip service to the idea.
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 12:08 AM
Aug 2017

He definitely won't be leading a movement to make it happen.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
6. The rationale? Jefferson was a monstrous hypocrite.
Thu Aug 17, 2017, 11:50 PM
Aug 2017
In the first half of the twentieth century the most important occurrence affecting the posthumous reputation and civil-religion status of Thomas Jefferson was the New Deal. Peterson depicts the Roosevelt Administration as building a great national temple to Jefferson's memory. The temple is the Jefferson Memorial in Washington, dedicated by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt on the two hundredth anniversary of Jefferson's birth, April 13, 1943. According to an official brochure, "Inscriptions at the memorial were selected by the Thomas Jefferson Memorial Commission and were taken from a wide variety of his writings on freedom, slavery, education and government." The section of the inscriptions that deals with freedom and slavery runs as follows:

God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that his justice cannot sleep forever. Commerce between master and slave is despotism. Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free.

All of this passage except for the last sentence is taken from Notes on the State of Virginia. The last sentence is taken from Jefferson's Autobiography. That sentence, as isolated in the memorial inscription, deceives the public as to Jefferson's meaning. For the original passage in the Autobiography continues, "Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them." (Emphasis added.)

In short, these people are to be free, and then deported. Jefferson's teaching on that matter is quite clear and often repeated.

Those who edited that inscription on behalf of the memorial commission must have known what they were doing when they wrenched that resounding sentence from the Autobiography out of the context that so drastically qualifies its meaning. The distortion by suppression has to be deliberate.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1996/10/thomas-jefferson-radical-and-racist/376685/




Rather than encouraging his countrymen to liberate their slaves, he opposed both private manumission and public emancipation. Even at his death, Jefferson failed to fulfill the promise of his rhetoric: his will emancipated only five slaves, all relatives of his mistress Sally Hemings, and condemned nearly 200 others to the auction block. Even Hemings remained a slave, though her children by Jefferson went free.

Nor was Jefferson a particularly kind master. He sometimes punished slaves by selling them away from their families and friends, a retaliation that was incomprehensibly cruel even at the time. A proponent of humane criminal codes for whites, he advocated harsh, almost barbaric, punishments for slaves and free blacks. Known for expansive views of citizenship, he proposed legislation to make emancipated blacks “outlaws” in America, the land of their birth. Opposed to the idea of royal or noble blood, he proposed expelling from Virginia the children of white women and black men.

Jefferson also dodged opportunities to undermine slavery or promote racial equality. As a state legislator he blocked consideration of a law that might have eventually ended slavery in the state.

As president he acquired the Louisiana Territory but did nothing to stop the spread of slavery into that vast “empire of liberty.” Jefferson told his neighbor Edward Coles not to emancipate his own slaves, because free blacks were “pests in society” who were “as incapable as children of taking care of themselves.” And while he wrote a friend that he sold slaves only as punishment or to unite families, he sold at least 85 humans in a 10-year period to raise cash to buy wine, art and other luxury goods.

Destroying families didn’t bother Jefferson, because he believed blacks lacked basic human emotions. “Their griefs are transient,” he wrote, and their love lacked “a tender delicate mixture of sentiment and sensation.”

Jefferson claimed he had “never seen an elementary trait of painting or sculpture” or poetry among blacks and argued that blacks’ ability to “reason” was “much inferior” to whites’, while “in imagination they are dull, tasteless, and anomalous.” He conceded that blacks were brave, but this was because of “a want of fore-thought, which prevents their seeing a danger till it be present.”

A scientist, Jefferson nevertheless speculated that blackness might come “from the color of the blood” and concluded that blacks were “inferior to the whites in the endowments of body and mind.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/01/opinion/the-real-thomas-jefferson.html



At a time when it is important to condemn white nationalists and supremacists unequivocally, invoking Thomas Jefferson is a mistake.

White supremacy is based on the concept that blacks and other people of color are not equal to whites -- many believe they are not even worth the three-fifths that was embodied in the original Constitution for tax and representation purposes. Such notions of inferiority are what Jefferson and other slave owners used to justify holding blacks in captivity and treating them as animals.
Invoking Jefferson to condemn the white supremacists and neo-Nazis who were demonstrating Friday and Saturday is antithetical to Jefferson's beliefs -- and certainly to the life he led.

Jefferson owned 600 slaves during his lifetime, freeing only two men before he died and bequeathing freedom to five other men, believed to be his progeny, upon his death.

And that is part of why McAuliffe's invocation of Jefferson hit me so hard. Our national healing cannot move forward if even well-meaning leaders don't recognize the role our Founding Fathers played in seeding white supremacy.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/15/opinions/jefferson-charlottesville-rally-opinion-due/index.html


Although I suppose there's probably an argument to be made that in his monstrous racism and hypocrisy, Thomas Jefferson is actually an honest representation of America.

marybourg

(12,633 posts)
9. Still, not the same as being a traitor and taking up arms
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 12:00 AM
Aug 2017

against his country.

Would you be in favor of de-funding the upkeep of the Jefferson Memorial, perhaps leaving it to a private foundation? That's a bridge too far for me; it's censoring an important founder and thinker for one aspect of his belief system.

Do we censor all his sayings and writings? Or just the ones we disapprove of? I can find it in my heart to accept him, stains and all. Stonewall Jackson and other traitors, not.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
11. Recognising the reality instead of perpetuating a myth would probably help.
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 12:05 AM
Aug 2017

And "founding father" or no, I don't especially think that Jefferson is a fit symbol for a nation that isn't based on the idea of white supremacy.

marybourg

(12,633 posts)
15. But it IS based on a lot of Jefferson's ideas.
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 12:10 AM
Aug 2017

There's the rub. How much of him can be erased? This is wrenching.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
16. No it isn't?
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 12:20 AM
Aug 2017

Jefferson wasn't responsible for writing the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. Many of his ideas were bad ones (for instance he argued that the Federal government should have no veto over laws passed by the states). He did write the Declaration of Independence (or, was the principal author of a document substantially edited by a committee, anyway). Among the people claiming Jefferson's authority for their actions in later years were John Calhoun with his doctrine of nullification and most of the Southern states with secession. It was Hamilton's vision of what the government should be that triumphed.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
10. If we took down all memorials of hypocrites
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 12:01 AM
Aug 2017

then MLK would have to go too. He was a pastor who allegedly cheated countless times on his wife. He was allegedly in another woman's bed the night before he was assassinated. Jackie O was apparently disgusted with him after hearing of tapes where he tried to organize a "sex party", which apparently was code for orgy. You'd have to conclude that a Baptist minister engaging in this behavior is very hypocritical.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
12. King's hypocrisy has no bearing on his message though.
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 12:07 AM
Aug 2017

He isn't remembered for preaching in favour of marital continence, but for civil rights. Jefferson, though? He's remembered as a "prophet of freedom" who said "all men are created equal"...who argued that freed slaves should be deported or outlawed (outlawry being a legal state that stripped someone of all legal protection and allowed them to be killed on sight). Those two things aren't really comparable.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
25. Hypocrisy is not at all the point. Treason is. The Confederacy was TREASON. Should we have
Sat Aug 19, 2017, 04:25 AM
Aug 2017

statues of the leading TRAITORS????

 

rusty fender

(3,428 posts)
22. Lincoln also believed that blacks
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 01:12 AM
Aug 2017

were not the equal of whites, but he did oppose slavery. Should we defund the Lincoln Memorial because of Lincoln's beliefs about blacks

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
23. Lincoln didn't own slaves, or father children by them after raping them?
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 01:29 AM
Aug 2017
Jefferson’s real and lasting contribution to the American experiment is not exhausted either by the Declaration or by the institution of slavery. It is as a theorist of race domination—of white supremacy, of the perdurability of race (and specifically the black race), of the ineradicable shallowness of blackness as against the textured profundity of whiteness—that he stands out. And that is a legacy that persists to this day.

Jefferson was not a liberal hypocrite, a symptom of his time. He was the avant garde of a group of American theorists who were struggling to reconcile the ideals of the Declaration with the reality of chattel slavery. His resolution of that struggle took the form of one of the most vicious doctrines of racial supremacy the world had yet seen. That is his legacy, or at least part of his legacy. He was by no means the only one to take this route, but he was one of the earliest and easily the most famous. He is the tributary of what would become an American tradition.

Jefferson, I would submit, should be remembered not only as the writer of the Declaration of Independence and owner of slaves, but also as a contributor, along with his successors, to a doctrine of race war and what Hannah Arendt would later call, in another context, “race imperialism”—which would find its ultimate fulfillment a century later, and a continent away.

http://crookedtimber.org/2012/12/02/thomas-jefferson-american-fascist/

BannonsLiver

(16,422 posts)
7. The logic is the same as the old gay marriage argument conservatives used to promote.
Thu Aug 17, 2017, 11:51 PM
Aug 2017

"If we let two men marry what's next, people can marry their dog!?"

marybourg

(12,633 posts)
13. Probably. I only saw it for a second, and didn't hear it at all.
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 12:08 AM
Aug 2017

Listening to him on that clip, my heart wants to agree with him. But my head thinks it's wrong (I have a hard time saying he's wrong; I admire him very much.)

Yes. there was a time when I didn't agree with him quite so much, and I know that you know when it was. But just as I think Jefferson can be understood if not forgiven, I understand Sharpton.

17. If it were up to me . . .
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 12:20 AM
Aug 2017

I'd have all monuments and memorials and statues of so-called "great men" (and women) taken down. Idolatrous nonsense. Man has a pretty high opinion of himself, all in all, and it isn't warranted.

So, defund (and demolish) the Jefferson Memorial. And the Lincoln Memorial. And topple that ludicrous Egyptian obelisk the mars the nation's capital. Washington, D.C., in large part, is a testament to the warped egos of profoundly proud, and profoundly flawed, people.

marybourg

(12,633 posts)
18. I certainly think it's time we stopped expending our resources
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 12:26 AM
Aug 2017

on new memorials. But I wouldn't go so far as to take down those to our founding generation. . . or to our greatest generation. . . or to some of our greatest past presidents. Not everyone reads books once they're out of school, and "those who forget history . . ." well. you know.

19. Except that, to my mind, a "monument" to a man . . .
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 12:46 AM
Aug 2017

... in itself, communicates little besides hero-worship and idolatry.

I mean, for someone who otherwise knows little or nothing about George Washington, what does a 555-foot tall obelisk -- the symbol of ancient Egyptian pharaohs, who were worshiped as gods on Earth -- say of the man, hmm? Washington, for whom the renunciation of power was his great defining attribute ... memorialized in the manner of a pseudo-deity. What a preposterous travesty.

"Monumental Washington," in particular, is like a theme park for warped egomaniacs. Tear 'em all down ... except for the Vietnam Memorial, which speaks eloquently to the great harm these "great men" can do the average, decent person.

Self-governing citizens shouldn't be into the hero-worship of "great men." Such should be reserved to subjects and slaves.

marybourg

(12,633 posts)
20. As you point out about Washington, it's their ideas
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 12:51 AM
Aug 2017

that are important, that carry society forward, that form the basis for a "teachable moment" when we see, and bring our children to see, a monument to a man, a memorial to a terrible event.

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
27. Fox News lies and distorts what Democrats
Sat Aug 19, 2017, 05:13 AM
Aug 2017

say all the time . Don't believe it unless there's confirmation from other sources.

underpants

(182,851 posts)
28. Yes if one person in the left says it, it must mean all on the left agree
Sat Aug 19, 2017, 06:14 AM
Aug 2017

Or if it's something kind of outrageous then they fill airtime mocking that person. Rev. Al hits the buttons for their viewers on many levels. It's no coincidence that BLM has to be mentioned on every Fox and talk radio show.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»De-fund Jefferson Memoria...