Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHistorian and author explains how racism is part of the Trump family DNA.
The key thing to remember about this statue, and most of these statues, is that they have very little to do with the Civil War. This statute was erected in 1924, almost 70 years after the end of the Civil War. It was erected at height of Jim Crow, the height of the era of segregation, disenfranchisement, and lynching. By the way, after the Civil War Robert E. Lee refused to criticize those who lynched black people or used violence of other kinds against them. He opposed black suffrage. He thought of himself as a gentleman, which he probably was, but he certainly didnt think black people should have any rights.
Like all these statues, this one was erected as a statement about whos in charge, about the power structure in society. My feeling is that it is not necessary to take down all these statues. Instead, I would like to see them erect other statues. Instead of taking down Lee, lets put up a statue right near himof, let us say, John M. Langston, a black member of Congress from Virginia in the 1880s, right after the end of Reconstruction. You dont see very many statues to black leaders of the Reconstruction or post-Reconstruction South in Virginia or anywhere else. So if were going to talk about statues, I say lets have the statuary be fully representative of Southern history.
. . .
Racism is part of the DNA of Trump. He and his father were sued by the Justice Department in 1973 for not letting black people rent the apartment buildings they managed. Trump first came to prominence on political questions when he took a full-page ad in The New York Times demanding the death penalty for four black young men who were accused and convictedand later exoneratedof assaulting a woman jogger in Central Park. Trump became the spokesman of the so-called birther movement that denied that Barack Obama was a citizen of the United States. He certainly has played the racial card, as they say, very strongly both in his political and in his familys commercial life. But Trump says, Ive got a lot black friends. I knew Muhammad Ali. He once said, I was Muhammad Alis best friend. Which is probably an exaggeration.
. . .
Trump is an exaggerated form of what has happened to the Republican Party in the last half-century. We forget that before 1964, and even after that for a while, there were many Republicans who were strong civil-rights advocates. People like Jacob Javits, senator from New York State, and Robert Taft, the famous conservative Republican in the 40s were strong supporters of black rights. The Civil Rights Act of 64 would never have passed if Everett Dirksen had been not gotten some Republican votes for it in the Senate. This is the party of Lincolnor at least it was.
What is different about Trump is how open he is about it all. Normally, the appeals to white racism are done through code words, like law and order. Trump campaigned saying all black people are living in hellholes and asking them, What do you have to lose? by voting for Trump. Its become pretty clear what they have to lose: They can lose the right to vote. They can lose affirmative action. They can lose the notion the federal government sees racism as a serious problem in the United States.
Like all these statues, this one was erected as a statement about whos in charge, about the power structure in society. My feeling is that it is not necessary to take down all these statues. Instead, I would like to see them erect other statues. Instead of taking down Lee, lets put up a statue right near himof, let us say, John M. Langston, a black member of Congress from Virginia in the 1880s, right after the end of Reconstruction. You dont see very many statues to black leaders of the Reconstruction or post-Reconstruction South in Virginia or anywhere else. So if were going to talk about statues, I say lets have the statuary be fully representative of Southern history.
. . .
Racism is part of the DNA of Trump. He and his father were sued by the Justice Department in 1973 for not letting black people rent the apartment buildings they managed. Trump first came to prominence on political questions when he took a full-page ad in The New York Times demanding the death penalty for four black young men who were accused and convictedand later exoneratedof assaulting a woman jogger in Central Park. Trump became the spokesman of the so-called birther movement that denied that Barack Obama was a citizen of the United States. He certainly has played the racial card, as they say, very strongly both in his political and in his familys commercial life. But Trump says, Ive got a lot black friends. I knew Muhammad Ali. He once said, I was Muhammad Alis best friend. Which is probably an exaggeration.
. . .
Trump is an exaggerated form of what has happened to the Republican Party in the last half-century. We forget that before 1964, and even after that for a while, there were many Republicans who were strong civil-rights advocates. People like Jacob Javits, senator from New York State, and Robert Taft, the famous conservative Republican in the 40s were strong supporters of black rights. The Civil Rights Act of 64 would never have passed if Everett Dirksen had been not gotten some Republican votes for it in the Senate. This is the party of Lincolnor at least it was.
What is different about Trump is how open he is about it all. Normally, the appeals to white racism are done through code words, like law and order. Trump campaigned saying all black people are living in hellholes and asking them, What do you have to lose? by voting for Trump. Its become pretty clear what they have to lose: They can lose the right to vote. They can lose affirmative action. They can lose the notion the federal government sees racism as a serious problem in the United States.
https://www.thenation.com/article/eric-foner-white-nationalists-neo-confederates-and-donald-trump/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 2037 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post