Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

diva77

(7,650 posts)
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 05:11 PM Aug 2017

Meanwhile... Fukushima Plant Is Releasing 770,000 Tons of Radioactive Water Into the Pacific Ocean

Fukushima Plant Is Releasing 770,000 Tons of Radioactive Water Into the Pacific Ocean
Friday, August 18, 2017 By Dahr Jamail, Truthout

http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/41564-fukushima-plant-is-releasing-tons-of-radioactive-water-into-the-pacific-ocean

SNIP...Recently, TEPCO announced that it would dump 770,000 tons of radioactive tritium water into the Pacific Ocean.

The announcement infuriated local fishermen and environmental groups across Japan. According to Mozhgan Savabieasfahani, an environmental toxicologist and winner of the 2015 Rachel Carson prize, their outrage and alarm is not without merit.

"The release of thousands of tons of radioactive tritium by a giant utility company into our aquatic and natural environments is a blood-chilling prospect," Savabieasfahani told Truthout.

She questions why there is not more outrage from those in the Japanese government who are responsible for safeguarding the health and wellbeing of the general public.

"Where are the defenders of our public's health?" she asked. "If they could pull the plug out of their mouth, they could tell us that tritium is a toxic radioactive isotope of hydrogen, and that, once released, tritium cannot be removed from the environment. Let that sink in."

Takashi Kawamura, TEPCO's chairman, when asked about the decision to introduce this vast amount of radioactive water into the ocean, initially responded, "The decision has already been made. SNIP

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

diva77

(7,650 posts)
2. So many layers of repug self-inflicted crap going on in DC that we can't even prioritize and address
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 05:18 PM
Aug 2017

ongoing major environmental disasters

diva77

(7,650 posts)
5. Mind-boggling! :( As of Dec., radiation attributed to Fukushima was detected in
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 05:23 PM
Aug 2017

Oregon.

Fukushima radiation has reached U.S. shores
http://www.statesmanjournal.com/story/tech/science/environment/2016/12/07/fukushima-radiation-has-reached-us-shores/95045692/

SNIP For the first time, seaborne radiation from Japan’s Fukushima nuclear disaster has been detected on the West Coast of the United States.

Cesium-134, the so-called fingerprint of Fukushima, was measured in seawater samples taken from Tillamook Bay and Gold Beach in Oregon, researchers from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution are reporting.

Because of its short half-life, cesium-134 can only have come from Fukushima.

Also for the first time, cesium-134 has been detected in a Canadian salmon, the Fukushima InFORM project, led by University of Victoria chemical oceanographer Jay Cullen, is reporting.

In both cases, levels are extremely low, the researchers said, and don’t pose a danger to humans or the environment.

Massive amounts of contaminated water were released from the crippled nuclear plant following a 9.0 magnitude earthquake and tsunami in March 2011. More radiation was released to the air, then fell to the sea.

Woods Hole chemical oceanographer Ken Buesseler runs a crowd-funded, citizen science seawater sampling project that has tracked the radiation plume as it slowly makes its way across the Pacific Ocean. SNIP

Warpy

(111,305 posts)
7. Thanks, I just clicked on the thread and got as far as
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 05:42 PM
Aug 2017

"well, a pint's a pound the world around..."

One hopes the release is slow enough the minimize the damage. Releasing it quickly will make sea life around Japan inedible for a very long time.

I'm just grateful it's not being sold to a nuclear power for building bombs.

FBaggins

(26,754 posts)
14. Why do you imagine that matters?
Sat Aug 19, 2017, 07:47 PM
Aug 2017

The amount of water is irrelevant.

The relevant figure is the amount and type of radioactive element involved... and the reason you won't see that reported is that it violates the FUD principal. It's a naturally-occurring material (tritium) that is an incredibly weak radiator that poses essentially zero risk. In fact, many reactors sell the stuff for consumer and commercial use.

 

aidbo

(2,328 posts)
16. Not bad for a rough estimate, but I think you're off by a factor of 10.
Sat Aug 19, 2017, 08:33 PM
Aug 2017

(770,000 tons x 2,000 lbs per ton) / 8.34 lbs per gallon = 184,652,278.177 gallons or about 0.185 billion gallons.

Often when hearing about large volumes of water, they speak of how many 'Olympic swimming pools' it is. google tells me an Olympic swimming pool (OSP) is 660,000 gallons.

So the 770000 tons is 184,652,278 gallons / 660,000 gallons per OSP = 279.8 Olympic Swimming Pools

procon

(15,805 posts)
4. So one company gets to decide that it's OK to pollute the world's oceans
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 05:19 PM
Aug 2017

and spread their radioactive material off to beaches of other countries? What am I missing here? The world was outraged about the spread or radioactive waste from Chernobyl, is the failed reactor in Japan less of a danger?

Brother Buzz

(36,449 posts)
6. Japanese Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) gets to decide..and they are fine with it
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 05:30 PM
Aug 2017

Japanese Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA), Shunichi Tanaka, has claimed that tritium is of little danger to humans and supports TEPCO's plans to dump the water into the ocean.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
10. The whole Pacific is being irradiated and few give a f***
Sat Aug 19, 2017, 12:57 AM
Aug 2017

I swear this is one the great scandals of our lifetime. My wife's family is convinced the Japanese government is covering up the extent of radiation exposure.

diva77

(7,650 posts)
11. I wouldn't be a bit surprised. Also, even though officials claim radiation levels are low
Sat Aug 19, 2017, 01:07 AM
Aug 2017

they forgot to take into account bio-accumulation, as discussed, for example, in this study:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X12001890

Bioaccumulation of tritiated water in phytoplankton and trophic transfer of organically bound tritium to the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis
. Benedict C.Jaeschke; ClareBradshaw
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.07.008

Abstract

SNIP Large releases of tritium are currently permitted in coastal areas due to assumptions that it rapidly disperses in the water and has a low toxicity due to its low energy emissions. This paper presents a laboratory experiment developed to identify previously untested scenarios where tritium may concentrate or transfer in biota relevant to Baltic coastal communities. Phytoplankton populations of Dunaliella tertiolecta and Nodularia spumigena were exposed at different growth-stages, to tritiated water (HTO; 10 MBq l?1). Tritiated D. tertiolecta was then fed to mussels, Mytilus edulis, regularly over a period of three weeks. Activity concentrations of phytoplankton and various tissues from the mussel were determined.

Both phytoplankton species transformed HTO into organically-bound tritium (OBT) in their tissues. D. tertiolecta accumulated significantly more tritium when allowed to grow exponentially in HTO than if it had already reached the stationary growth phase; both treatments accumulated significantly more than the corresponding treatments of N. spumigena. No effect of growth phase on bioaccumulation of tritium was detectable in N. spumigena following exposure. After mussels were given 3 feeds of tritiated D. tertiolecta, significant levels of tritium were detected in the tissues. Incorporation into most mussel tissues appeared to follow a linear relationship with number of tritiated phytoplankton feeds with no equilibrium, highlighting the potential for biomagnification. SNIP

FBaggins

(26,754 posts)
15. Fukushima was almost six and a half years ago.
Sat Aug 19, 2017, 07:53 PM
Aug 2017

When will we start seeing this bioaccumulation?

Commercial fishing resumed off Fukushima some time back and it's quite uncommon to find any fish with detectable levels of radiation from the event.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Meanwhile... Fukushima Pl...