Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mfcorey1

(11,001 posts)
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 06:39 AM Aug 2017

Hurricane Harvey And The Potential Hypocrisy Of Texas Republicans

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hurricane-harvey-texas-republicans-sandy-hypocrisy_us_59a46fcce4b041393a1fc43a?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009

WASHINGTON ― Texas Republicans, long accustomed to bashing the federal government, are already changing their tune now that Hurricane Harvey has devastated parts of their state.

An emergency aid package hasn’t surfaced yet, but Congress almost certainly will have to approve a spending bill to help those affected by the hurricane-force winds and widespread flooding in southeastern Texas. The question is whether that money will be offset by cuts to other government programs, whether extraneous spending will be attached to the package, and whether, under any circumstances, Texas Republicans will have a problem voting for it.

Money to help those in need from a lawmaker’s homestate isn’t a particularly tough vote. At this point, no Texas Republican has declared any sort of condition for their support of an emergency aid package. But when it was New York and New Jersey hit hard by Hurricane Sandy in 2012, all but one Texas Republican in Congress ― Rep. John Culberson ― voted against a $50.5 billion package to help people in those states.

That was no surprise. The Texas delegation tends to speak with one voice, and there’s little political repercussions for its members to vote against government largesse for another state.

Many Republicans at the time said they took issue with unrelated spending that was attached to the Sandy bill, though most of the funding was directed at helping the storm’s victims. And even some of the most derided provisions ― like $2 million to repair Smithsonian roofs in Washington ― were, in fact, related to that storm (it brought heavy wind and rain to that nation’s capital, as well.)
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hurricane Harvey And The Potential Hypocrisy Of Texas Republicans (Original Post) mfcorey1 Aug 2017 OP
Hypocrisy is their stock in trade! Dustlawyer Aug 2017 #1
We'll see what other republicans do in response to these dumb bastards votes uponit7771 Aug 2017 #2
They always change their tunes when they need something. Solly Mack Aug 2017 #3
Will Trump refuse to sign if it doesn't include his precious wall funding? bullwinkle428 Aug 2017 #4
Potential? muntrv Aug 2017 #5
Arrogant filth. "Don't Mess with Texas," but everyone else is fair game. Glorfindel Aug 2017 #6

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
1. Hypocrisy is their stock in trade!
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 07:21 AM
Aug 2017

I am ashamed they are from my state! They need to be reminded of their denial of similar victims in need! This is coming from someone worried his house may get flooded today!

Republicans only see the need when it happens to them!

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
4. Will Trump refuse to sign if it doesn't include his precious wall funding?
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 08:58 AM
Aug 2017

Go ahead...make our day, asshole!

Glorfindel

(9,729 posts)
6. Arrogant filth. "Don't Mess with Texas," but everyone else is fair game.
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 09:10 AM
Aug 2017

There's no "potential hypocrisy." They're proud of their hypocrisy. As a southerner, I should add: "bless their hearts." But not in this case. My god daughter and her family were affected by Hurricane Sandy and these slimy Texas Repuke monsters voted against helping them. I take it very personally.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hurricane Harvey And The ...