General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow does Trump's new 45/USA hat not directly violate the Emoluments Clause?
Argue what you want about his other scams, but this is as blatant as it gets. He's selling cheap-ass Chinese-made "45" logo hats on his web site for $40. How is this the slightest bit legal?
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)brooklynite
(94,571 posts)unblock
(52,229 posts)official functions?
i vaguely recall stories about then-vice president al gore needing to go across the street at some point to make a fund-raising phone call because doing that on government property was a no-no.
but of course, none of this applies to republicans....
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)Trump is a fascist racist supported by fascist racists, while he violates the laws daily, it doesnt count
JHB
(37,160 posts)Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)What a money grubbing Republican sleazeball comrade casino is.
kentuck
(111,095 posts)...and ignore major violations.
They don't seem to understand that it is still in violation of our Constitution?
Perhaps they don't care about the law?
chowder66
(9,070 posts)That is one ugly shape of a hat. It looks weird. Granted I've never been a fan of trucker hats but his is extra sad.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)That's what I thought
FBaggins
(26,737 posts)A campaign selling hats wouldn't be the same thing. Both sides have done that for years.