Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
Thu Sep 14, 2017, 10:24 AM Sep 2017

Face-reading AI will be able to detect your politics and IQ, professor says

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/12/artificial-intelligence-face-recognition-michal-kosinski

"Voters have a right to keep their political beliefs private. But according to some researchers, it won’t be long before a computer program can accurately guess whether people are liberal or conservative in an instant. All that will be needed are photos of their faces.

Michal Kosinski – the Stanford University professor who went viral last week for research suggesting that artificial intelligence (AI) can detect whether people are gay or straight based on photos – said sexual orientation was just one of many characteristics that algorithms would be able to predict through facial recognition.

Using photos, AI will be able to identify people’s political views, whether they have high IQs, whether they are predisposed to criminal behavior, whether they have specific personality traits and many other private, personal details that could carry huge social consequences, he said.

Kosinski outlined the extraordinary and sometimes disturbing applications of facial detection technology that he expects to see in the near future, raising complex ethical questions about the erosion of privacy and the possible misuse of AI to target vulnerable people."
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Face-reading AI will be able to detect your politics and IQ, professor says (Original Post) AngryAmish Sep 2017 OP
Kill all humans nycbos Sep 2017 #1
I'm extremely sceptical TubbersUK Sep 2017 #2
it's true, if you have the skills you can do it yourself...for example snooper2 Sep 2017 #8
You're joking? TubbersUK Sep 2017 #9
Also, a very narrow jawline is usually representative of somebody who is vegetarian snooper2 Sep 2017 #10
LOL N/T TubbersUK Sep 2017 #12
Phrenology 2.0 Salviati Sep 2017 #3
I'll just leave this here..... workinclasszero Sep 2017 #4
Color Me Skeptical ProfessorGAC Sep 2017 #5
Doesn't matter if it's accurate gratuitous Sep 2017 #6
This professor is just wrong LeftishBrit Sep 2017 #7
Yes 19th Century 'criminologists' TubbersUK Sep 2017 #11
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
8. it's true, if you have the skills you can do it yourself...for example
Thu Sep 14, 2017, 12:36 PM
Sep 2017

People who have a very large forehead tend to not be very bright...

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
10. Also, a very narrow jawline is usually representative of somebody who is vegetarian
Thu Sep 14, 2017, 12:50 PM
Sep 2017

From day one they weren't really designed to eat steakburgers...and therefore tend to be on the left politically


Easy peasy!

Salviati

(6,008 posts)
3. Phrenology 2.0
Thu Sep 14, 2017, 10:51 AM
Sep 2017

I'm overwhelming suspicious that machine learning is just picking up on the social cues that we ourselves are giving. Picking up a subjects sexuality from their dating site picture? It wouldn't be surprising to me if there are differences in how people present themselves in such contexts. Do the same trick with neutral context pictures and maybe I'll start to believe it.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
4. I'll just leave this here.....
Thu Sep 14, 2017, 11:13 AM
Sep 2017
Facial recognition is here. The iPhone X is just the beginning
Apple’s new smartphone will unlock using face recognition, thanks to infrared and 3D sensors. This technology is spreading – and complacency is not an option
Clare Garvie

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/13/facial-recognition-iphone-x-privacy

ProfessorGAC

(65,076 posts)
5. Color Me Skeptical
Thu Sep 14, 2017, 11:46 AM
Sep 2017

I know that i can tell sometimes that the newsmakers in DC are cranky old man conservatives, but that's only because they're in politics, they're younger than me, and look like cranky old men.

But, i see some guy at the grocery store and even if he looks like a cranky old man, i don't know who he likely voted for. The town i'm in went 51:49 HRC. So, it's a coin flip. I could guess, but i'd only have a 50% chance of getting it right, and i actually know these townspeople.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
6. Doesn't matter if it's accurate
Thu Sep 14, 2017, 11:56 AM
Sep 2017

There will be those who base decisions on this sort of divination: "Gee Harold, we think you'd make a swell addition to our firm, but according to this Kosinski Report, you're just too darned liberal! Sorry." Of course, it won't be anywhere near that blatant and obvious, but that will be the upshot of it all.

LeftishBrit

(41,208 posts)
7. This professor is just wrong
Thu Sep 14, 2017, 12:25 PM
Sep 2017

You can't tell from someone's face whether they have a high IQ, what their political beliefs are, or whether they are predisposed to criminality. That is reminiscent of the long-discredited 19th century 'science' of phrenology.

TubbersUK

(1,439 posts)
11. Yes 19th Century 'criminologists'
Thu Sep 14, 2017, 12:53 PM
Sep 2017

who claimed to be able to predict criminal behaviour based on facial measurements and postulated the idea of the 'born criminal'.

It also has a whiff of the early 20th Century eugenics movement.

Very unpleasant, and as you say a load of old claptrap anyway.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Face-reading AI will be a...