Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLondon's Amazingly Explicit Surveillance State Mascot For The 2012 Olympics Has A Huge Camera Eye
That 'Records Everything'Olympic mascots are often controversial. Usually this is because they are weird blobby cartoon characters with goofy names that seem to have been dreamed up by creators who mainlined Mountain Dew Code Red while watching 24 straight hours of Pokemon. The official mascot for the 2012 Olympics, set in London, has that going for it but is also controversial for an entirely different reason. London, the premiere panoptic city was one of the first to blanket itself with CCTV cameras; its heavy security and surveillance cordon is nicknamed the Ring of Steel. London decided to make its surveillance yen a dominant feature of its otherwise goofy mascots. Wenlock and Mandeville both have a huge single eye made out of a camera lens so that they can record everything. Image at right is from the official London Olympics website.
snip
Surveillance is fun! Surveillance is cuddly! Surveillance makes you healthier! In an animated film about the birth of Wenlock and Mandeville, a steelworker gives the ever-recording dolls to his grandchildren who are thrilled with them:
&feature=player_embedded
Theres a reason why theres so much great literature (Ken MacLeods Intrusion, Cory Doctorows Little Brother) and TV (Black Mirror) coming out of the UK that contemplate dystopic futures and unbundle the way that surveillance technologies, while simplifying our lives, imperil civil liberties and freedom of expression in ways unforeseen even by George Orwell. It seems that those in the UK are already living in that world.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2012/05/17/londons-amazingly-explicit-surveillance-state-mascot-for-the-2012-olympics-has-a-huge-camera-eye-that-records-everything/
The choice of two spooky mascots each with an all-seeing-recording-eye are enough to turn me off the Olympics in and of itself - never mind the dystopian, militarized, police state type atmosphere that it seems will be permeating London for the duration. The Olympics? No thanks. Not for me this year. I'll just stay home and read 1984.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 2035 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
London's Amazingly Explicit Surveillance State Mascot For The 2012 Olympics Has A Huge Camera Eye (Original Post)
JohnyCanuck
Jul 2012
OP
DJ13
(23,671 posts)1. Those Brits think of everything
I never would have thought to put a camera in dildo's.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)2. Oh.My.God
Sanity has left the building.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)3. They've used it before
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)4. orwell predicted the future of england
is there a camera behind the mirror?
JohnyCanuck
(9,922 posts)5. Not just England...
In his novel 1984 Great Britain had been renamed Airstrip One, an outpost of a country now called Oceana, i.e. the Americas, including the former USA.
Seems to me that with the choice of these two ugly, freakazoid Olympic mascots with the recording eyes somebody (or bodies) really gets off on rubbing it in our faces that their are plans in the work for our future and they aren't shy about dropping some broad hints as to what form they expect that future is going to take.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)6. thanks.. i never caught that when i read 1984..