Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
Sun Sep 24, 2017, 10:35 AM Sep 2017

Who will enforce these 1st Amendment violations?

Sarah Huckabee, tRump, and now Mnuchin.


Mnuchin: NFL players 'can do free speech on their own time'
By KEVIN ROBILLARD 09/24/2017 10:06 AM EDT

Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin backed President Donald Trump's days of attacks on NFL players, saying athletes "can do free speech on their own time."

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/24/nfl-players-mnuchin-trump-free-speech-243065

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who will enforce these 1st Amendment violations? (Original Post) SHRED Sep 2017 OP
There is, in general, no penalty for not obeying The Constitution rock Sep 2017 #1
From the guy who can't do private travel on his own dime leftstreet Sep 2017 #2
What violation would that be? Criticism? X_Digger Sep 2017 #3
We don't like it. Igel Sep 2017 #4

rock

(13,218 posts)
1. There is, in general, no penalty for not obeying The Constitution
Sun Sep 24, 2017, 10:50 AM
Sep 2017

Sure, you could (in theory) be impeached, if we had a Congress that was little more than a cow turd.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
3. What violation would that be? Criticism?
Sun Sep 24, 2017, 10:57 AM
Sep 2017

Did someone in the government stop someone from speaking or protesting?

That would be a violation. Tweeting criticism? No, just no.

Igel

(35,320 posts)
4. We don't like it.
Sun Sep 24, 2017, 11:22 AM
Sep 2017

It must be Constitutional.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


All we have to do is reinterpret "Congress" to mean "the President" and "abridge" to mean "criticize" and make "freedom of speech" an absolute so that a judge can get up during a trial to campaign for a candidate, a teacher can get up to criticize whoever they like, and a preacher can order his parishioners to vote "in God's name" for the candidate of his (or in some cases her) choice ... all while mandating that nobody can dare utter a word of criticism against them.

Trump's breaking protocol. He's not the first to do it; he's doing it with utter abandon. But most only respect tradition when it gets them something, usually control over others. If it's in their way, these days the attitude is that tradition is old-fashioned and should be tossed in the dustbin. We'll make our own traditions, even if we make them on Sunday and discard them on Monday, and we have venerable "traditions" now that date back only 2-3 years.

(Where I work we had a "tradition" last year that we were to keep, except that we were told about this tradition for the first time the day before it was to be upheld. "We're keeping the tradition" meant "we're doing something completely new." By not doing it for the first time we were "breaking the tradition.&quot
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who will enforce these 1s...